<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Depends on the packet loss, if you are having packet loss you
might want to look at iLBC (codec) and then Transcoding resources.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Go0se<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:59 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'Larry Hadrava'; 'Jim Reed'<br>
<b>Cc:</b> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] VoIP over Hardware VPN<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>I agree. All phones, voice gateways, etc., need to be able to
talk directly to each other – so EVERY subnet that has a phone on it (at least
a phone you want to be able to talk to) must have connectivity to the phone at
your house (and vice versa). <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Unrelated to your issue, if you notice quality issues with calls
you might consider using the g729 codec.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>-Go0se<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><a href="http://atc.go0se.com">http://atc.go0se.com</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Larry Hadrava<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:50 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Jim Reed<br>
<b>Cc:</b> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] VoIP over Hardware VPN<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>Jim:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>I would check your allowed network lists on the VPN setup.
You may be allowing the subnets for the CUCM and Unity servers but possibly not
the DHCP subnet that the phone you are trying to call.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>I am assuming that your voice servers are in a different
subnet than the IP phone at your house and on the other end. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>Thanks<br clear=all>
Larry Hadrava<br>
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA<br>
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.<br>
URL: <a href="http://www.IPexpert.com">http://www.IPexpert.com</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Jim Reed <<a
href="mailto:jreed@swiftnews.com">jreed@swiftnews.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>The phone is sitting here in my house and I
can ping it from my computer at my house. I can do an extension to extension
call and leave voicemail which goes through. However, if I do an
extension to extension call or make an outside call from or to the IP phone via
the telco then I see no rx traffic. Thank You...<br>
<br>
<br>
On 5/28/09 6:11 PM, "Craig Staffin" <<a
href="mailto:craig@staffin.org" target="_blank">craig@staffin.org</a>>
wrote:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>Jim,<br>
<br>
Keep in mind that the RTP traffic does not flow from phone to CUCM to
phone. So you would actually need to make sure you can ping the phone
from your hours and vise versa.<br>
<br>
Craig<br>
<br>
<br>
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Jim Reed <<u><span style='color:blue'><a
href="mailto:jreed@swiftnews.com" target="_blank">jreed@swiftnews.com</a></span></u>>
wrote:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><b><span style='font-size:10.5pt;
font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>Okay, hate to be a pain but the phone is
registered and when I call one of our main locations and enter the extension the
phone rings at my house but am getting no voice on my end. Seeing tx
traffic on the phone statistics but no rx traffic. Any thoughts?
Routing all seems to be in place. I can ping the phone from the
Call Manager and can ping the Call Manager from my home. Have the phone
in the same calling search space, location, etc., as the Call Manager it’s
registering to. It’s showing a g711 codec.<br>
<br>
Thanks in advance for any advice...<br>
</span></b><span style='font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>-- <br>
Jim Reed<br>
Technology Wrangler<br>
Swift Communications, Inc.<br>
970-683-5646 (Direct)<br>
970-683-5650 (Fax)<br>
<br>
</span><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'><br>
On 5/28/09 3:48 PM, "Wes Sisk" <<u><span style='color:blue'><a
href="mailto:wsisk@cisco.com" target="_blank">wsisk@cisco.com</a></span></u>>
wrote:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>It
depends on your setup. If you are doing address translation then you must
have it enabled.<br>
<br>
If you are not doing address translation and do not dynamic port allocation
(basically if you have permit ip any any) then you need to have it disabled.<br>
<br>
So, engineer's favorite answer - it depends.<br>
<br>
/Wes<br>
<br>
On Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:56:48 PM, Jim Reed <<u><span style='color:blue'><a
href="mailto:jreed@swiftnews.com" target="_blank">jreed@swiftnews.com</a></span></u>>
<<u><span style='color:blue'><a href="mailto:jreed@swiftnews.com"
target="_blank">mailto:jreed@swiftnews.com</a></span></u>> wrote:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>Re:
[cisco-voip] VoIP over Hardware VPN </span><b><span style='font-size:10.5pt;
font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>Thanks, Lelio.<br>
Are you referring to turning it on or turning it off!<br>
</span></b><span style='font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>--
<br>
Jim Reed<br>
Swift Communications, Inc.<br>
970-683-5646 (Direct)<br>
775-772-7666 (Cell)<br>
<br>
<br>
</span><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'><br>
On 5/28/09 1:55 PM, "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<u><span style='color:blue'><a
href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca" target="_blank">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a></span></u>>
<<u><span style='color:blue'><a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca"
target="_blank">mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca</a></span></u>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>I
think the biggest thing is "sccp fixup"....<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br>
<br>
<br>
----- Original Message -----<br>
From: "Jim Reed" <<u><span style='color:blue'><a
href="mailto:jreed@swiftnews.com" target="_blank">jreed@swiftnews.com</a></span></u>>
<<u><span style='color:blue'><a href="mailto:jreed@swiftnews.com"
target="_blank">mailto:jreed@swiftnews.com</a></span></u>> <br>
To: <u><span style='color:blue'><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net"
target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a></span></u>, <u><span
style='color:blue'><a href="mailto:ask-icd-ivr-support@external.cisco.com"
target="_blank">ask-icd-ivr-support@external.cisco.com</a><br>
</span></u>Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:44:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] VoIP over Hardware VPN<br>
<br>
VoIP over Hardware VPN </span><b><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:
"Verdana","sans-serif"'>Anyone have any hints, tips, suggestions, comments,
concerns, etc., regarding running a single IP phone over a hardware-to-hardware
VPN. I've tried it in the past but could only seem to get voice going in
one direction. It's been a while and I'm going to give it another shot.
Will be working with ASA 5505 on one and ASA 5510 on the other.
Call Manager 4.x. Probably a 7940 or 7960 phone. Internet
connections are 15-Meg-Over-Ethernet on one end and 10-Meg-Over-Ethernet on the
other. Current ping times between devices on the two ends are
consistently very fast -- less than 100ms over extended ping tests.<br>
<br>
Any advice, anecdotal wisdom, personal experience, etc., that anyone has had in
trying to do this is sincerely welcome and appreciated.<br>
<br>
Thank You...<br>
</span></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<u><span style='color:blue'><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net"
target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
</span></u> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<u><span style='color:blue'><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net"
target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a></span></u></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'><br>
<br>
-- <br>
Jim Reed<br>
Technology Wrangler<br>
Swift Communications, Inc.<br>
970-683-5646 (Direct)<br>
970-683-5650 (Fax)</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
<HTML><BODY><P><hr size=1></P>
<P><STRONG>
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
</STRONG></P></BODY></HTML>