<div>Ratko,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Did you happen to get my previous response to you? </div>
<div> </div>
<div>I have a slightly different design that has worked flawlessly. UCCX, CUCM Pub and Sub1 at a colo connected to HQ with UCCX HA and CUCM Sub02. 100Mpbs MetroE connection between the sites. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>I have been running this for a couple of years now with no issues. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Dustin<br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Ratko Dodevski <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rade239@gmail.com">rade239@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">Hi,<br>can I use this scenario: UCCX HA cluster on the same site with the CUCM Pub, and CUCM Sub in remote site which meets the requirements for clustering CUCM over WAN (optical link with max RTT of 8-10 ms). What would happened if my Pub crashes? Would the UCCX cluster remain it's functionality with the Subscriber. I've read that UCCX requires his CTI manager to be on the same LAN with max RTT of 2ms but also they say that this kind of scenario is possible. Anyone has some thoughts on this?<br>
<br>Thanks<br clear="all"><br>-- <br><font color="#888888">Ratko<br></font><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br><br></blockquote></div><br>