Would the behavior be different if the operator used a Direct Transfer instead of a consult transfer?<br><br>With a consult transfer it really is a new call to you from the operator, so the operator's callerID is the correct info to display.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Voice Noob <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:voicenoob@gmail.com">voicenoob@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US">
<div>
<p>I have Single Number Reach setup and working great. The only
thing I don’t like is if someone calls the main number and the operator
transfers a call to my desk IP phone. It will ring my cell phone with the main
number as the caller-id instead of the original caller number. If the caller
were to call my DID line directly it would show their caller-id on my cell
phone. Is there any way around this? Can I stop SNR on transferred calls? I
could set a deny ACL for the operator extension but I do want her to be able to
call my extension and get my cell phone so that is not the best option. Thanks.
</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>