<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>The advantages of Connection over Unity are quite a bit. I don't think we'd ever go back. Especially because we had to run our own domain and exchange servers. You have no option for unified messaging, but that wasn't a big deal for us since we never had it.<br><br>We call it a unified client. ;)<br><br><br><br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Robert Kulagowski" <rkulagow@gmail.com><br>To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 10:42:03 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity Connections - Why'd you do it? Would you go back to UM?<br><br>Thoughts from the group? We keep hearing the concern that users are <br>used to having VM in their Inbox; I've countered that they can still see <br>their VM messages, they'll just see it in a separate Inbox folder. From <br>what I can tell, the Media Master toolbar can still be configured to <br>play on the computer / play through the phone?<br><br>Has anyone gone to Connections and back to Unity/Exchange/Unified Messaging?<br><br>And finally, I'm I correct in calling IMAP to Connections as "Integrated <br>Messaging"?<br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br></div></body></html>