<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>We do it. It works 99.999 percent. I only say 99.999 percent, because we've had claims of some faxing not working but every time we try to reproduce it works. The most important things are:<br><ul><li>setting all fax devices to G3, not SuperG3 - this means 14.4 not 33.6 and turning off error correction</li><li>setting gateways to correct mode - this is summarized to passthrough, relay, etc.</li></ul>We chose passthrough cause it's the easiest and our WAN connections are actually LAN connections, so we have bandwidth to spare with low latency.<br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Damien Ball" <balld@gcs.k12.nc.us><br>To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 12:20:05 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Fax over PRI<br><br>Just curious about running fax data across a PRI. What is the general <br>consensus on doing this? Are there any problems with this type of <br>situation?<br>--<br>Damien Ball<br>Network Engineer<br>Granville County Schools<br>101 Delacroix Street<br>Oxford, NC 27565<br>Email: balld@gcs.k12.nc.us<br>Office: 919-690-2339<br>Fax: 919-690-2338<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br></div></body></html>