<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Last element to touch it sets privacy so make sure
routelist/routegroup/gateway does not change the value.<br>
<br>
after that I suggest using Dialed Number Analyzer to verify the call
flow.<br>
after that get CM SDI traces and run them through either triple combo
tool or translatorX. Look at the setup message going outbound. It may
be the setup message has presentation allowed but your carrier is
overwriting it.<br>
<br>
/Wes<br>
<br>
On Thursday, October 01, 2009 3:20:56 PM, Jack Martin
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jackm@tushaus.com"><jackm@tushaus.com></a> wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:86DD253A50828C40AB51057072CC6CD069142A4186@SARGE.Tushaus.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from rtf -->
<style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style><font
face="Calibri, sans-serif" size="2">
<div>I have a customer who has a co-resident on the CUCM 7.x. The
MGCP PRIs are set to Restricted for the Calling Party Presentation so
that CLID goes out as “Private.”</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The customer wants outbound CLID blocked but the co-resident
phones are to pass outbound CLID. I configured PT,CSS and Route
patterns to reflect the customer and co-resident dial plans. All calls
route out the same Route group. On the Customers Route
Patterns I set Calling Line ID/Name Presentation to “Restricted.” On
the co-residents Route Patterns I set the Calling Line ID/Name
Presentation to “Allowed” and also entered a Calling Party Transform
Mask. The Route List is set to Default to Use Calling
Party\'s External Phone Number Mask. I set The MGCP PRIs to Default
for the Calling Party Presentation.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I reset the PRIs but the CLID still shows as “Private” from the
co-resident extensions. Am I missing something? </div>
<div> </div>
<div><b>Jack Martin, CCVP</b></div>
<div>Network Engineer</div>
<div>Tushaus Computer Services</div>
<div>10400 Innovation Drive, Ste 100</div>
<div>Milwaukee, WI 53226</div>
<div>414.908.2222 Helpdesk</div>
<div>414.908.2267 Work</div>
<div>414.908.4467 Fax</div>
<div><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.Tushaus.com">http://www.Tushaus.com</a></div>
<div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.Linkedin.com/in/Jackster">http://www.Linkedin.com/in/Jackster</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
</font>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>