I also am pretty happy with Clarus on the config auditing stuff. I tried looking into the trace logs but it's all gobbly gook. <div><br></div><div>Tom Sparks</div><div>Sr. IPT Engineer</div><div>Taos Consulting</div><div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:00 AM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net</a>
You can reach the person managing the list at
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-owner@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-owner@puck.nether.net</a>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CCM Administration Audit? (ROZA, Ariel)
2. UCCX 7.0(1)SR4 - CAD stuck in loop upgrading client
(Matthew Linsemier)
3. Re: CCM Administration Audit? (Chris Ward (chrward))
4. Re: CCM Administration Audit? (Ryan Ratliff)
5. Re: CCM Administration Audit? (Cristobal Priego)
6. Re: IOS Release 15 Is out (Voice Noob)
7. adding subscriber in the CUCM cluster (Scott Kee)
8. HP Server Solutions page on Cisco 7800 MCS (Subhrojyoti Banerjee)
9. Re: HP Server Solutions page on Cisco 7800 MCS (Lelio Fulgenzi)
10. mobile connect configuration (Charles Goldsmith)
11. Re: mobile connect configuration (Chris Ward (chrward))
12. Re: mobile connect configuration (Charles Goldsmith)
13. Re: mobile connect configuration (Chris Ward (chrward))
14. Re: installing windows server 2008 standard on hp server (anand)
15. Re: mobile connect configuration (Chris Ward (chrward))
16. Re: installing windows server 2008 standard on hp server
(Robert Knapp)
17. Re: mobile connect configuration (Charles Goldsmith)
18. Re: mobile connect configuration (Voice Noob)
19. Re: another question for the cisco folk (Subhrojyoti Banerjee)
20. Re: mobile connect configuration (Robert Singleton)
21. Re: mobile connect configuration (Chris Ward (chrward))
22. Re: installing windows server 2008 standard on hp server (anand)
23. 7962 Registration Issues with 7.1.2.32014-1 ? (Jason Aarons (US))
24. Nortel Translator (Jason Aarons (US))
25. Resolved: 7962 Registration Issues with 7.1.2.32014-1 ?
(Jason Aarons (US))
26. Re: Nortel Translator (Philip Walenta)
27. Re: Nortel Translator (Matt Slaga (US))
28. Re: adding subscriber in the CUCM cluster (Adam Frankel)
29. OT Hypothetical USB question (Carter, Bill)
30. Re: OT Hypothetical USB question (Jason Aarons (US))
31. Re: OT Hypothetical USB question (Carter, Bill)
32. Re: OT Hypothetical USB question (Philip Walenta)
33. Re: OT Hypothetical USB question (Carter, Bill)
34. CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling (Jeff)
35. Re: Cisco CRS Development interuption? (Arnold Lesar)
36. Re: CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling (Chris Ward (chrward))
37. Re: CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling (Daniel Rodriguez)
38. Re: another question for the cisco folk (Wes Sisk)
39. Re: another question for the cisco folk (Lelio Fulgenzi)
40. Re: CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling (Daniel Rodriguez)
41. Re: connection bugs? (Pat Hayes)
42. cisco unified mobility advantage (Dane Newman)
43. Re: adding subscriber in the CUCM cluster (Scott Kee)
44. Cisco VG204/202 & Hylafax (Kim, Hyoun S)
45. Re: VoIP Monitoring tool (Daniel Durkin)
46. Re: connection bugs? (Lelio Fulgenzi)
47. Re: CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling (Jeff)
48. Cobras export/import to Unity 7 UM (Mike Lydick)
49. Bulk Subscription (Tim Fulton)
50. Re: CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling (Voice Noob)
51. Re: Cobras export/import to Unity 7 UM (Voice Noob)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:29:39 -0300
From: "ROZA, Ariel"
To:
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM Administration Audit?
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi!
I was wondering what kind of method do you guys use when needed to audit the CCM Administration pages (to know when someone modified/addeed a phone or a gateway, for example)
I have been requested this by several customers, and as far as my knowledge goes there is no straightforward Auditing setting in CCM.
Regards,
Ariel
ARIEL ROZA
Postsales Support Engineer
LOGICALIS
Paseo Col?n 707 - C.A.B.A. - Argentina - C1063ACH
Tel/Fax: +54 (11) 4344-0400
<a href="mailto:ariel.roza@la.logicalis.com">ariel.roza@la.logicalis.com</a>
<a href="http://www.la.logicalis.com">www.la.logicalis.com</a>
<a href="http://www.logicalisnow.com">www.logicalisnow.com</a>
Por favor, piense en el medioambiente antes de imprimir este email.
La presente informaci?n se env?a ?nicamente para el destinatario, y contiene informaci?n de car?cter CONFIDENCIAL o PRIVLEGIADA.
La modificaci?n, retransmisi?n, difus?n, copia u otro uso de esta informaci?n por cualquier medio, por personas distintas al destinatario, est?n estrictamente prohibidas.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:27:29 -0400
From: Matthew Linsemier
To: "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>"
Subject: [cisco-voip] UCCX 7.0(1)SR4 - CAD stuck in loop upgrading
client
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
All,
We recently upgraded to UCCX 7.0(1)SR4 to stay in line with a recent 7.1(3)
upgrade. The upgrades went fine, however we are running into an issue
upgrading some of our CAD clients for UCCX.
Usually, the process is where we make the users administrators of their
machines, they log in, click on Cisco Agent Desktop, it notices there is a
new version, runs the upgrade, and they are done. However, in a few cases,
we are running into an issue where for whatever reason, the CAD upgrade
process (which is the process that happens after the software was installed
via the .MSI), it loops over and over and never completes the upgrade. We
have uninstalled the software, cleaned the temp files, cleaned the registry,
reinstalled the .MSI file, and yet the upgrade still fails. It looks as if
it is trying to download a 21Mb upgrade, but it literally takes only 1
second, which maybe it can?t find it for whatever reason. I?m a bit
clueless as it worked find on the other 9 workstations we installed it on.
Can anyone shed any light on what may be wrong or what I can try?
Thanks,
Matt
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may
be protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended
solely for the use of the addressee identified above. If you
are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying
or distribution of this communication is UNAUTHORIZED. Neither
this information block, the typed name of the sender, nor
anything else in this message is intended to constitute an
electronic signature unless a specific statement to the
contrary is included in this message. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately contact me and delete
this communication from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 09:29:29 -0700
From: "Chris Ward (chrward)"
To: "ROZA, Ariel" ,
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM Administration Audit?
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82B08D50627@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com">75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82B08D50627@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
If you are looking for a tool, then someone else will have to comment.
If you are willing to do some looking and learning on your own, you can see everything that is done in the CCMAdmin pages via the Tomcat Localhost logs which you can collect via RTMT. They are *almost* human readable and can show actions/events on pages and the user login that performed them.
HTH
-Chris
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of ROZA, Ariel
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 12:30 PM
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM Administration Audit?
Hi!
I was wondering what kind of method do you guys use when needed to audit the CCM Administration pages (to know when someone modified/addeed a phone or a gateway, for example)
I have been requested this by several customers, and as far as my knowledge goes there is no straightforward Auditing setting in CCM.
Regards,
Ariel
ARIEL ROZA
Postsales Support Engineer
LOGICALIS
Paseo Col?n 707 - C.A.B.A. - Argentina - C1063ACH
Tel/Fax: +54 (11) 4344-0400
<a href="mailto:ariel.roza@la.logicalis.com">ariel.roza@la.logicalis.com</a>
<a href="http://www.la.logicalis.com">www.la.logicalis.com</a>
<a href="http://www.logicalisnow.com">www.logicalisnow.com</a>
Por favor, piense en el medioambiente antes de imprimir este email.
La presente informaci?n se env?a ?nicamente para el destinatario, y contiene informaci?n de car?cter CONFIDENCIAL o PRIVLEGIADA.
La modificaci?n, retransmisi?n, difus?n, copia u otro uso de esta informaci?n por cualquier medio, por personas distintas al destinatario, est?n estrictamente prohibidas.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:35:05 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff
To: "ROZA, Ariel"
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM Administration Audit?
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed";
DelSp="yes"
CUCM 7.1 has additional audit logs specifically for this purpose.
Check the release notes for details.
-Ryan
On Oct 6, 2009, at 12:29 PM, ROZA, Ariel wrote:
Hi!
I was wondering what kind of method do you guys use when needed to
audit the CCM Administration pages (to know when someone modified/
addeed a phone or a gateway, for example)
I have been requested this by several customers, and as far as my
knowledge goes there is no straightforward Auditing setting in CCM.
Regards,
Ariel
ARIEL ROZA
Postsales Support Engineer
LOGICALIS
Paseo Col?n 707 - C.A.B.A. - Argentina - C1063ACH
Tel/Fax: +54 (11) 4344-0400
<a href="mailto:ariel.roza@la.logicalis.com">ariel.roza@la.logicalis.com</a>
<a href="http://www.la.logicalis.com">www.la.logicalis.com</a>
<a href="http://www.logicalisnow.com">www.logicalisnow.com</a>
Por favor, piense en el medioambiente antes de imprimir este email.
La presente informaci?n se env?a ?nicamente para el destinatario, y
contiene informaci?n de car?cter CONFIDENCIAL o PRIVLEGIADA.
La modificaci?n, retransmisi?n, difus?n, copia u otro uso de esta
informaci?n por cualquier medio, por personas distintas al
destinatario, est?n estrictamente prohibidas.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 09:37:19 -0700
From: Cristobal Priego
To: "Chris Ward (chrward)"
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM Administration Audit?
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:687869f00910060937q12cf2deep42a6919f2ad86b18@mail.gmail.com">687869f00910060937q12cf2deep42a6919f2ad86b18@mail.gmail.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Clarius is a pretty awesome tool. its a third party application that works
great and will let know know what was added, when or what was modified and
when
2009/10/6 Chris Ward (chrward)
> If you are looking for a tool, then someone else will have to comment.
>
>
>
> If you are willing to do some looking and learning on your own, you can see
> everything that is done in the CCMAdmin pages via the Tomcat Localhost logs
> which you can collect via RTMT. They are *almost* human readable and can
> show actions/events on pages and the user login that performed them.
>
>
>
> HTH
>
>
>
> -Chris
>
>
>
> *From:* <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] *On Behalf Of *ROZA, Ariel
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 06, 2009 12:30 PM
> *To:* <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] CCM Administration Audit?
>
>
>
> Hi!
>
>
>
> I was wondering what kind of method do you guys use when needed to audit
> the CCM Administration pages (to know when someone modified/addeed a phone
> or a gateway, for example)
>
>
>
> I have been requested this by several customers, and as far as my
> knowledge goes there is no straightforward Auditing setting in CCM.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Ariel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *ARIEL ROZA*
> *Postsales Support Engineer*
>
>
>
> *LOGICALIS*
> Paseo Col?n 707 - C.A.B.A. - Argentina - C1063ACH
> Tel/Fax: +54 (11) 4344-0400
> *<a href="mailto:ariel.roza@la.logicalis.com">ariel.roza@la.logicalis.com</a>*
> *<a href="http://www.la.logicalis.com">www.la.logicalis.com</a>
> <a href="http://www.logicalisnow.com">www.logicalisnow.com</a>*
>
>
>
> Por favor, piense en el medioambiente antes de imprimir este email.
> La presente informaci?n se env?a ?nicamente para el destinatario, y
> contiene informaci?n de car?cter CONFIDENCIAL o PRIVLEGIADA.
> La modificaci?n, retransmisi?n, difus?n, copia u otro uso de esta
> informaci?n por cualquier medio, por personas distintas al destinatario,
> est?n estrictamente prohibidas.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:56:51 -0500
From: "Voice Noob"
To: "'Matthew Loraditch'" , "'Lelio
Fulgenzi'"
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IOS Release 15 Is out
Message-ID: <004801ca46a6$01cf78d0$056e6a70$@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
There is a new version of the ISR routers coming out next year.
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Matthew Loraditch
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 8:28 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IOS Release 15 Is out
go to the download section for 15, 1900, 2900 and 3900
plus this
<a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/fundamentals/configuration/guide/cf_dgtly_sgnd_sw.html">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/fundamentals/configuration/guide/cf_dgtl
y_sgnd_sw.html</a>
Matthew Loraditch
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
<a href="mailto:support@heliontechnologies.com">support@heliontechnologies.com</a>
(p) (410) 252-8830
(F) (443) 541-1593
Visit us at <a href="http://www.heliontechnologies.com">www.heliontechnologies.com</a>
Support Issue? Email
<a href="mailto:support@heliontechnologies.com">support@heliontechnologies.com</a> for fast assistance!
_____
From: Lelio Fulgenzi [<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 9:18 PM
To: Matthew Loraditch
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IOS Release 15 Is out
where are you reading about new routers? am i missing something?
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Loraditch"
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2009 8:41:38 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [cisco-voip] IOS Release 15 Is out
<a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/15_0/release/notes/150MNEWF.html">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/15_0/release/notes/150MNEWF.html</a>
Lots of reading there, some new features for CCME and such and new routers
coming
I'm sure 13 got canned for bad luck but happened to 14?
Matthew Loraditch
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
<a href="mailto:support@heliontechnologies.com">support@heliontechnologies.com</a>
(p) (410) 252-8830
(F) (443) 541-1593
Visit us at <a href="http://www.heliontechnologies.com">www.heliontechnologies.com</a>
Support Issue? Email
<a href="mailto:support@heliontechnologies.com">support@heliontechnologies.com</a> for fast assistance!
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:48:14 -0500
From: Scott Kee
To: cisco-voip mailinglist
Subject: [cisco-voip] adding subscriber in the CUCM cluster
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:21712D91F95FB640822E2DFE19ADB7DB101C7D35@CMSMAIL.Spectrumhealth.com">21712D91F95FB640822E2DFE19ADB7DB101C7D35@CMSMAIL.Spectrumhealth.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I am trying to setup a test CUCM cluster in my test lab. I've setup CUCM Publisher and Subscriber using VMware v2.
I tweaked MAC Addresses so both Publisher and Subscriber has MAC address as production server.
I installed License keys so CUCM has 2 server and devices licenses. So I think I am good as far as licenses concern.
I installed Publisher and works fine however I installed Subscriber but it is not showing up in the CUCM Group.
It only shows Publisher. I configured subscriber in the System->Server and System->Cisco Unified UM before I installed Subscriber.
Do I need to change anything after the installation?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:11:41 +0530
From: Subhrojyoti Banerjee
To:
Subject: [cisco-voip] HP Server Solutions page on Cisco 7800 MCS
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi All,
As you can see from below screen shot, the G6 is mentioned; and in the table that follows, we have specific mention of the G6 being able to be used to load CUCM.
<a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6790/ps5748/ps378/product_solution_overview09186a0080107d79.html">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6790/ps5748/ps378/product_solution_overview09186a0080107d79.html</a>
But on the reference page for CUCM, we see the AC691A model (5540 -
2.53GHz) referred to
Whereas the box is checked for CCM 4.3(2) and CUCM 7.1(3). I don't know why we don't see a dual Nehalem HP box on this matrix yet, but neither do we see an dual Nehalem IBM box. Perhaps still being tested.
Am I reading this correctly?
Has anyone tried to install CUCM 7.1(3) on a DL380G6 single E5540 (AC691A)?
Thanks and regards,
Subhrojyoti
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Outlook.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 73008 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Outlook.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 100557 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Outlook.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 10530 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:41:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi
To: Subhrojyoti Banerjee
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] HP Server Solutions page on Cisco 7800 MCS
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:1476485067.11635741254854483430.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca">1476485067.11635741254854483430.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I asked this a day or two ago...Wes confirmed that only the single 2.53Ghz CPU is required for CallManager as the "7845" equiv.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Subhrojyoti Banerjee"
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2009 1:41:41 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [cisco-voip] HP Server Solutions page on Cisco 7800 MCS
Hi All,
As you can see from below screen shot, the G6 is mentioned; and in the table that follows, we have specific mention of the G6 being able to be used to load CUCM.
<a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6790/ps5748/ps378/product_solution_overview09186a0080107d79.html">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6790/ps5748/ps378/product_solution_overview09186a0080107d79.html</a>
But on the reference page for CUCM, we see the AC691A model (5540 - 2.53GHz) referred to
Whereas the box is checked for CCM 4.3(2) and CUCM 7.1(3). I don't know why we don't see a dual Nehalem HP box on this matrix yet, but neither do we see an dual Nehalem IBM box. Perhaps still being tested.
Am I reading this correctly?
Has anyone tried to install CUCM 7.1(3) on a DL380G6 single E5540 (AC691A)?
Thanks and regards,
Subhrojyoti
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:23:37 -0500
From: Charles Goldsmith
To: voip puck
Subject: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:4be4573d0910061223laaaf531y4ea61f2407ca5c23@mail.gmail.com">4be4573d0910061223laaaf531y4ea61f2407ca5c23@mail.gmail.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mobile connect (Single Number Reach) on the CM (7.1.2) has me a bit
baffled. When the call goes through to the cell, and is answered, no
problems there, however, when you want to pick up the line on your
desk, there is no button to do so. You have to hang up the cell
phone, which puts the call on hold on your desk, or use the enterprise
feature codes (for example, *81 to hold) and put the call on hold,
then pick it up on the desk phone.
Details on this configuration are found at
<a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/fsmobmgr.html">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/fsmobmgr.html</a>
Is there no better way to handle this? The end user is going to hear
on-hold music either way. On a CME, the desk phone gets a resume
button because the call seems to be on-hold during SNR, and you can
switch it from mobile to desk seamlessly with no clicks, blips, or
on-hold music.
Our CIO doesn't like our "upgrade" from CME to CM because of this
feature, and the loss of visual voicemail (another issue outside the
scope of this topic).
Any help would be appreciated.
Charles
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:48:35 -0700
From: "Chris Ward (chrward)"
To: "Charles Goldsmith" , "voip puck"
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82B08D50726@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com">75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82B08D50726@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi Charles,
You are correct in your understanding. One thing that *may* help is the
following:
On the user config page in CCMAdmin, under the mobility settings, there
is a parameter called " Maximum Wait Time for Desk Pickup". Setting this
to 0 will disable the automatic call hold when you hang up on your desk
phone. So when you want to flat-out end a call, you can just hang up.
Now, if you want to transfer the call to your desk phone, you can still
use the *81 feature and can pick it up on the desk phone.
Also, not sure why you can't get visual voicemail. My CUCM phone has it
running, although I am not sure what the CUCM versions or apps are
behind as I don't have visibility into that cluster.
I will pass this feedback along as the CME method does seem a little
nicer than the CUCM method, but really, you should provide this feedback
to your account team. Good luck!
-Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Charles
Goldsmith
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:24 PM
To: voip puck
Subject: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
Mobile connect (Single Number Reach) on the CM (7.1.2) has me a bit
baffled. When the call goes through to the cell, and is answered, no
problems there, however, when you want to pick up the line on your
desk, there is no button to do so. You have to hang up the cell
phone, which puts the call on hold on your desk, or use the enterprise
feature codes (for example, *81 to hold) and put the call on hold,
then pick it up on the desk phone.
Details on this configuration are found at
<a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/fsmobmgr.html">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f
smobmgr.html</a>
Is there no better way to handle this? The end user is going to hear
on-hold music either way. On a CME, the desk phone gets a resume
button because the call seems to be on-hold during SNR, and you can
switch it from mobile to desk seamlessly with no clicks, blips, or
on-hold music.
Our CIO doesn't like our "upgrade" from CME to CM because of this
feature, and the loss of visual voicemail (another issue outside the
scope of this topic).
Any help would be appreciated.
Charles
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:58:11 -0500
From: Charles Goldsmith
To: "Chris Ward (chrward)"
Cc: voip puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:4be4573d0910061258p200f2b19ue7ff58e221f6452c@mail.gmail.com">4be4573d0910061258p200f2b19ue7ff58e221f6452c@mail.gmail.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Thanks Chris. I did play around with the Maximum wait time, but my
users (and CIO) prefer the hangup method over using the code.
About visual voicemail, from what I've read, it's not supported on the
non-java phones, and all of my users have 7960G phones. The CME/CUE
combo offered a nice, quick application for visual voicemail. The few
people who have 7975G don't like the slowness of the java app (me
being one of them).
I will certainly give this feedback to my Cisco account manager.
Thanks
Charles
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Chris Ward (chrward) wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> You are correct in your understanding. One thing that *may* help is the
> following:
>
> On the user config page in CCMAdmin, under the mobility settings, there
> is a parameter called " Maximum Wait Time for Desk Pickup". Setting this
> to 0 will disable the automatic call hold when you hang up on your desk
> phone. So when you want to flat-out end a call, you can just hang up.
> Now, if you want to transfer the call to your desk phone, you can still
> use the *81 feature and can pick it up on the desk phone.
>
> Also, not sure why you can't get visual voicemail. My CUCM phone has it
> running, although I am not sure what the CUCM versions or apps are
> behind as I don't have visibility into that cluster.
>
> I will pass this feedback along as the CME method does seem a little
> nicer than the CUCM method, but really, you should provide this feedback
> to your account team. Good luck!
>
> -Chris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Charles
> Goldsmith
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:24 PM
> To: voip puck
> Subject: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
>
> Mobile connect (Single Number Reach) on the CM (7.1.2) has me a bit
> baffled. ?When the call goes through to the cell, and is answered, no
> problems there, however, when you want to pick up the line on your
> desk, there is no button to do so. ?You have to hang up the cell
> phone, which puts the call on hold on your desk, or use the enterprise
> feature codes (for example, *81 to hold) and put the call on hold,
> then pick it up on the desk phone.
>
> Details on this configuration are found at
> <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f</a>
> smobmgr.html
>
> Is there no better way to handle this? ?The end user is going to hear
> on-hold music either way. ? On a CME, the desk phone gets a resume
> button because the call seems to be on-hold during SNR, and you can
> switch it from mobile to desk seamlessly with no clicks, blips, or
> on-hold music.
>
> Our CIO doesn't like our "upgrade" from CME to CM because of this
> feature, and the loss of visual voicemail (another issue outside the
> scope of this topic).
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Charles
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
>
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:03:11 -0700
From: "Chris Ward (chrward)"
To: "Charles Goldsmith"
Cc: voip puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82B08D5072D@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com">75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82B08D5072D@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Ah, I was missing the part about the 7960 (non-java).
So yes, you are limited there. But you are going to be limited in basically all the new features also.
I use a 7975 and don't experience any type of slowness (or don't think I do). Are there specific areas of phone usage you experience the slowness? I honestly haven't noticed any peppiness issues on the Java phone with the exception of pre-dialing, which was fixed when we introduced en-bloc dialing a little while ago.
Let me know. Thanks Charles!
-Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:<a href="mailto:wokka@justfamily.org">wokka@justfamily.org</a>]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:58 PM
To: Chris Ward (chrward)
Cc: voip puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
Thanks Chris. I did play around with the Maximum wait time, but my
users (and CIO) prefer the hangup method over using the code.
About visual voicemail, from what I've read, it's not supported on the
non-java phones, and all of my users have 7960G phones. The CME/CUE
combo offered a nice, quick application for visual voicemail. The few
people who have 7975G don't like the slowness of the java app (me
being one of them).
I will certainly give this feedback to my Cisco account manager.
Thanks
Charles
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Chris Ward (chrward) wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> You are correct in your understanding. One thing that *may* help is the
> following:
>
> On the user config page in CCMAdmin, under the mobility settings, there
> is a parameter called " Maximum Wait Time for Desk Pickup". Setting this
> to 0 will disable the automatic call hold when you hang up on your desk
> phone. So when you want to flat-out end a call, you can just hang up.
> Now, if you want to transfer the call to your desk phone, you can still
> use the *81 feature and can pick it up on the desk phone.
>
> Also, not sure why you can't get visual voicemail. My CUCM phone has it
> running, although I am not sure what the CUCM versions or apps are
> behind as I don't have visibility into that cluster.
>
> I will pass this feedback along as the CME method does seem a little
> nicer than the CUCM method, but really, you should provide this feedback
> to your account team. Good luck!
>
> -Chris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Charles
> Goldsmith
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:24 PM
> To: voip puck
> Subject: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
>
> Mobile connect (Single Number Reach) on the CM (7.1.2) has me a bit
> baffled. ?When the call goes through to the cell, and is answered, no
> problems there, however, when you want to pick up the line on your
> desk, there is no button to do so. ?You have to hang up the cell
> phone, which puts the call on hold on your desk, or use the enterprise
> feature codes (for example, *81 to hold) and put the call on hold,
> then pick it up on the desk phone.
>
> Details on this configuration are found at
> <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f</a>
> smobmgr.html
>
> Is there no better way to handle this? ?The end user is going to hear
> on-hold music either way. ? On a CME, the desk phone gets a resume
> button because the call seems to be on-hold during SNR, and you can
> switch it from mobile to desk seamlessly with no clicks, blips, or
> on-hold music.
>
> Our CIO doesn't like our "upgrade" from CME to CM because of this
> feature, and the loss of visual voicemail (another issue outside the
> scope of this topic).
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Charles
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
>
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:12:14 -0500
From: anand
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] installing windows server 2008 standard on
hp server
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:2b1167120910061312h1417c040ifd30fa1abc5e8ed2@mail.gmail.com">2b1167120910061312h1417c040ifd30fa1abc5e8ed2@mail.gmail.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi,
I have an HP proliant 360 server.I am planning to install windows server
2008 on the server.I started with HP smartnet cd which aks me to upload the
dvd image file .When i tried to open the file and choose continue it says *'a
valid cd image 1 is required to continue*".
I gave correct product key which i got from windows.I downloaded the image
file from microsoft.Can someone help me to figure out the problem.
thanks,
anand.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:25:32 -0700
From: "Chris Ward (chrward)"
To: "Chris Ward (chrward)" , "Charles Goldsmith"
Cc: voip puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82B08D50746@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com">75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82B08D50746@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Charles,
Just learned of a feature called "Dusting" or "Call Move" which will be released in CUCM 8.0 that will allow you to push a call to your desk phone from the cell phone without MOH being heard. So it's not perfect but better.
-Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Chris Ward (chrward)
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 4:03 PM
To: Charles Goldsmith
Cc: voip puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
Ah, I was missing the part about the 7960 (non-java).
So yes, you are limited there. But you are going to be limited in basically all the new features also.
I use a 7975 and don't experience any type of slowness (or don't think I do). Are there specific areas of phone usage you experience the slowness? I honestly haven't noticed any peppiness issues on the Java phone with the exception of pre-dialing, which was fixed when we introduced en-bloc dialing a little while ago.
Let me know. Thanks Charles!
-Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:<a href="mailto:wokka@justfamily.org">wokka@justfamily.org</a>]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:58 PM
To: Chris Ward (chrward)
Cc: voip puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
Thanks Chris. I did play around with the Maximum wait time, but my
users (and CIO) prefer the hangup method over using the code.
About visual voicemail, from what I've read, it's not supported on the
non-java phones, and all of my users have 7960G phones. The CME/CUE
combo offered a nice, quick application for visual voicemail. The few
people who have 7975G don't like the slowness of the java app (me
being one of them).
I will certainly give this feedback to my Cisco account manager.
Thanks
Charles
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Chris Ward (chrward) wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> You are correct in your understanding. One thing that *may* help is the
> following:
>
> On the user config page in CCMAdmin, under the mobility settings, there
> is a parameter called " Maximum Wait Time for Desk Pickup". Setting this
> to 0 will disable the automatic call hold when you hang up on your desk
> phone. So when you want to flat-out end a call, you can just hang up.
> Now, if you want to transfer the call to your desk phone, you can still
> use the *81 feature and can pick it up on the desk phone.
>
> Also, not sure why you can't get visual voicemail. My CUCM phone has it
> running, although I am not sure what the CUCM versions or apps are
> behind as I don't have visibility into that cluster.
>
> I will pass this feedback along as the CME method does seem a little
> nicer than the CUCM method, but really, you should provide this feedback
> to your account team. Good luck!
>
> -Chris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Charles
> Goldsmith
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:24 PM
> To: voip puck
> Subject: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
>
> Mobile connect (Single Number Reach) on the CM (7.1.2) has me a bit
> baffled. ?When the call goes through to the cell, and is answered, no
> problems there, however, when you want to pick up the line on your
> desk, there is no button to do so. ?You have to hang up the cell
> phone, which puts the call on hold on your desk, or use the enterprise
> feature codes (for example, *81 to hold) and put the call on hold,
> then pick it up on the desk phone.
>
> Details on this configuration are found at
> <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f</a>
> smobmgr.html
>
> Is there no better way to handle this? ?The end user is going to hear
> on-hold music either way. ? On a CME, the desk phone gets a resume
> button because the call seems to be on-hold during SNR, and you can
> switch it from mobile to desk seamlessly with no clicks, blips, or
> on-hold music.
>
> Our CIO doesn't like our "upgrade" from CME to CM because of this
> feature, and the loss of visual voicemail (another issue outside the
> scope of this topic).
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Charles
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:27:28 -0500
From: Robert Knapp
To: anand , "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>"
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] installing windows server 2008 standard on
hp server
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:0265D29403E7EE46B37A63FEE0026A2F0415A547C2@SPLKEXCH07.spanlink.com">0265D29403E7EE46B37A63FEE0026A2F0415A547C2@SPLKEXCH07.spanlink.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I had a similar issue with win2k3r2. The disk was bad.
If it's a HP, smart start is already installed...
Change the array to best practice
Install windows, add smart start drivers
Thanks,
Robert Knapp
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of anand
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 4:12 PM
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] installing windows server 2008 standard on hp server
Hi,
I have an HP proliant 360 server.I am planning to install windows server 2008 on the server.I started with HP smartnet cd which aks me to upload the dvd image file .When i tried to open the file and choose continue it says 'a valid cd image 1 is required to continue".
I gave correct product key which i got from windows.I downloaded the image file from microsoft.Can someone help me to figure out the problem.
thanks,
anand.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:37:01 -0500
From: Charles Goldsmith
To: "Chris Ward (chrward)"
Cc: voip puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:4be4573d0910061337g4cb024c6g8efea0945a47f5ab@mail.gmail.com">4be4573d0910061337g4cb024c6g8efea0945a47f5ab@mail.gmail.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
It's a good first start, and as long as its a seamless move (ie, like
the CME), it should suffice.
About the slowness of the java, I was specificially referring to the
visual voicemail. On my 7975, when I hit the services button, select
the visual voicemail app and hit select, it will take 4 to 5 seconds
to load the app. On a 7960 on the CME, hitting Service, then
Selecting the visual voicemail is quick, less than half a second.
I understand features on the newer phones, but there are faster ways
to program than always using Java, and Cisco is bad about using it too
much.
I'm not trying to start a flame war about what is the best language,
and I understand why they use Java for the portability, but its
notorious for slowness.
Charles
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Chris Ward (chrward) wrote:
> Charles,
>
> Just learned of a feature called "Dusting" or "Call Move" which will be released in CUCM 8.0 that will allow you to push a call to your desk phone from the cell phone without MOH being heard. So it's not perfect but better.
>
> -Chris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Chris Ward (chrward)
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 4:03 PM
> To: Charles Goldsmith
> Cc: voip puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
>
> Ah, I was missing the part about the 7960 (non-java).
>
> So yes, you are limited there. But you are going to be limited in basically all the new features also.
>
> I use a 7975 and don't experience any type of slowness (or don't think I do). Are there specific areas of phone usage you experience the slowness? I honestly haven't noticed any peppiness issues on the Java phone with the exception of pre-dialing, which was fixed when we introduced en-bloc dialing a little while ago.
>
> Let me know. Thanks Charles!
>
> -Chris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:<a href="mailto:wokka@justfamily.org">wokka@justfamily.org</a>]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:58 PM
> To: Chris Ward (chrward)
> Cc: voip puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
>
> Thanks Chris. ? I did play around with the Maximum wait time, but my
> users (and CIO) prefer the hangup method over using the code.
>
> About visual voicemail, from what I've read, it's not supported on the
> non-java phones, and all of my users have 7960G phones. ?The CME/CUE
> combo offered a nice, quick application for visual voicemail. ?The few
> people who have 7975G don't like the slowness of the java app (me
> being one of them).
>
> I will certainly give this feedback to my Cisco account manager.
>
> Thanks
> Charles
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Chris Ward (chrward) wrote:
>> Hi Charles,
>>
>> You are correct in your understanding. One thing that *may* help is the
>> following:
>>
>> On the user config page in CCMAdmin, under the mobility settings, there
>> is a parameter called " Maximum Wait Time for Desk Pickup". Setting this
>> to 0 will disable the automatic call hold when you hang up on your desk
>> phone. So when you want to flat-out end a call, you can just hang up.
>> Now, if you want to transfer the call to your desk phone, you can still
>> use the *81 feature and can pick it up on the desk phone.
>>
>> Also, not sure why you can't get visual voicemail. My CUCM phone has it
>> running, although I am not sure what the CUCM versions or apps are
>> behind as I don't have visibility into that cluster.
>>
>> I will pass this feedback along as the CME method does seem a little
>> nicer than the CUCM method, but really, you should provide this feedback
>> to your account team. Good luck!
>>
>> -Chris
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
>> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Charles
>> Goldsmith
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:24 PM
>> To: voip puck
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
>>
>> Mobile connect (Single Number Reach) on the CM (7.1.2) has me a bit
>> baffled. ?When the call goes through to the cell, and is answered, no
>> problems there, however, when you want to pick up the line on your
>> desk, there is no button to do so. ?You have to hang up the cell
>> phone, which puts the call on hold on your desk, or use the enterprise
>> feature codes (for example, *81 to hold) and put the call on hold,
>> then pick it up on the desk phone.
>>
>> Details on this configuration are found at
>> <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f</a>
>> smobmgr.html
>>
>> Is there no better way to handle this? ?The end user is going to hear
>> on-hold music either way. ? On a CME, the desk phone gets a resume
>> button because the call seems to be on-hold during SNR, and you can
>> switch it from mobile to desk seamlessly with no clicks, blips, or
>> on-hold music.
>>
>> Our CIO doesn't like our "upgrade" from CME to CM because of this
>> feature, and the loss of visual voicemail (another issue outside the
>> scope of this topic).
>>
>> Any help would be appreciated.
>>
>> Charles
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
>
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:02:24 -0500
From: "Voice Noob"
To: "'Charles Goldsmith'" , "'Chris Ward
\(chrward\)'"
Cc: 'voip puck'
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
Message-ID: <000001ca46c8$5065c1d0$f1314570$@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I agree on the slowness of the JAVA visual voicemail.
-----Original Message-----
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Charles Goldsmith
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:37 PM
To: Chris Ward (chrward)
Cc: voip puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
It's a good first start, and as long as its a seamless move (ie, like
the CME), it should suffice.
About the slowness of the java, I was specificially referring to the
visual voicemail. On my 7975, when I hit the services button, select
the visual voicemail app and hit select, it will take 4 to 5 seconds
to load the app. On a 7960 on the CME, hitting Service, then
Selecting the visual voicemail is quick, less than half a second.
I understand features on the newer phones, but there are faster ways
to program than always using Java, and Cisco is bad about using it too
much.
I'm not trying to start a flame war about what is the best language,
and I understand why they use Java for the portability, but its
notorious for slowness.
Charles
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Chris Ward (chrward)
wrote:
> Charles,
>
> Just learned of a feature called "Dusting" or "Call Move" which will be
released in CUCM 8.0 that will allow you to push a call to your desk phone
from the cell phone without MOH being heard. So it's not perfect but better.
>
> -Chris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Chris Ward
(chrward)
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 4:03 PM
> To: Charles Goldsmith
> Cc: voip puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
>
> Ah, I was missing the part about the 7960 (non-java).
>
> So yes, you are limited there. But you are going to be limited in
basically all the new features also.
>
> I use a 7975 and don't experience any type of slowness (or don't think I
do). Are there specific areas of phone usage you experience the slowness? I
honestly haven't noticed any peppiness issues on the Java phone with the
exception of pre-dialing, which was fixed when we introduced en-bloc dialing
a little while ago.
>
> Let me know. Thanks Charles!
>
> -Chris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:<a href="mailto:wokka@justfamily.org">wokka@justfamily.org</a>]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:58 PM
> To: Chris Ward (chrward)
> Cc: voip puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
>
> Thanks Chris. ? I did play around with the Maximum wait time, but my
> users (and CIO) prefer the hangup method over using the code.
>
> About visual voicemail, from what I've read, it's not supported on the
> non-java phones, and all of my users have 7960G phones. ?The CME/CUE
> combo offered a nice, quick application for visual voicemail. ?The few
> people who have 7975G don't like the slowness of the java app (me
> being one of them).
>
> I will certainly give this feedback to my Cisco account manager.
>
> Thanks
> Charles
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Chris Ward (chrward)
wrote:
>> Hi Charles,
>>
>> You are correct in your understanding. One thing that *may* help is the
>> following:
>>
>> On the user config page in CCMAdmin, under the mobility settings, there
>> is a parameter called " Maximum Wait Time for Desk Pickup". Setting this
>> to 0 will disable the automatic call hold when you hang up on your desk
>> phone. So when you want to flat-out end a call, you can just hang up.
>> Now, if you want to transfer the call to your desk phone, you can still
>> use the *81 feature and can pick it up on the desk phone.
>>
>> Also, not sure why you can't get visual voicemail. My CUCM phone has it
>> running, although I am not sure what the CUCM versions or apps are
>> behind as I don't have visibility into that cluster.
>>
>> I will pass this feedback along as the CME method does seem a little
>> nicer than the CUCM method, but really, you should provide this feedback
>> to your account team. Good luck!
>>
>> -Chris
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
>> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Charles
>> Goldsmith
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:24 PM
>> To: voip puck
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
>>
>> Mobile connect (Single Number Reach) on the CM (7.1.2) has me a bit
>> baffled. ?When the call goes through to the cell, and is answered, no
>> problems there, however, when you want to pick up the line on your
>> desk, there is no button to do so. ?You have to hang up the cell
>> phone, which puts the call on hold on your desk, or use the enterprise
>> feature codes (for example, *81 to hold) and put the call on hold,
>> then pick it up on the desk phone.
>>
>> Details on this configuration are found at
>> <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f</a>
>> smobmgr.html
>>
>> Is there no better way to handle this? ?The end user is going to hear
>> on-hold music either way. ? On a CME, the desk phone gets a resume
>> button because the call seems to be on-hold during SNR, and you can
>> switch it from mobile to desk seamlessly with no clicks, blips, or
>> on-hold music.
>>
>> Our CIO doesn't like our "upgrade" from CME to CM because of this
>> feature, and the loss of visual voicemail (another issue outside the
>> scope of this topic).
>>
>> Any help would be appreciated.
>>
>> Charles
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 02:43:21 +0530
From: Subhrojyoti Banerjee
To: ,
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Hi Wes,
I posted the same question today, but had another related query. Although it's pretty interesting fact, but it's a bit in contradiction to what has been said about this before. This concept comes up in the UCCE 7.5 BOM, where it says-
*********(Pg 12)***********************
Central Processing Unit
Each individual core in a multi-core processor does not count as a processor towards server requirements given in Appendix A ? Server Classes. A processor is considered a single physical CPU, regardless of the number of cores.
***************************************
But if a single E5540 processor quad core Nehalem processor can function as a "7845" equivalent - with the number of supported phones in line with the 7845 figures (of course with 4+GB and 4 x 140GB drives), then that's a competitive piece of hardware. What do you think?
Thanks,
Subhrojyoti
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:58:03 -0400
From: <a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>
To: <a href="mailto:wsisk@cisco.com">wsisk@cisco.com</a>
CC: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk
that's kinda cool. save the cost of a CPU. should make the total cost a bit cheaper.
i guess UCCE, Connection, etc, require the additional quad core CPU to sustain the higher device loads.
thanks for chiming in. ;)
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wes Sisk"
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi"
Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list"
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2009 5:52:33 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk
Confirmed, it is a single quad core instead of 2 dual cores.
Intentional and by design.
/Wes
On Monday, October 05, 2009 5:32:03 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi
wrote:
hoping
the cisco folk can chime in here...the latest swonly specs for the HP
servers show that the 7845 equivalent (not really, but the one that
serves 7500 units) is only one CPU, unlike the high availability
servers for connection which has two CPUs.
was there an error in the docs or is the 7500 device server really only
one CPU?
i'm hoping some internal training reflects the correct stats.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 20
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:40:49 -0500
From: Robert Singleton
To: voip puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:4ACBAB51.60909@morsco.com">4ACBAB51.60909@morsco.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 10/06/2009 03:37 PM, Charles Goldsmith wrote:
> I'm not trying to start a flame war about what is the best language,
> and I understand why they use Java for the portability, but its
> notorious for slowness.
Anything interpretted on the fly is going to be slow, or at least
slowish....
:/
Robert
------------------------------
Message: 21
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:33:27 -0700
From: "Chris Ward (chrward)"
To: "Voice Noob" , "Charles Goldsmith"
Cc: voip puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82B08D50789@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com">75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82B08D50789@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Roger.
I too, do not want to start a war over this. However, on my 7975, with visual voicemail enabled, I am not experiencing this same delay. Now, my Visual Voicemail is not activated via "Services" menu, I just have to select the voicemail button and it allows me to choose regular voicemail or Visual Voicemail. As soon as I select Visual Voicemail, I see a "starting Application" message for ~1 second, then it offers a login prompt. Signing in takes ~2-3 seconds, but again, no long pauses.
It is possible that there are some time-outs or other stuff going on in your environment. The non-java and java phones would have different time-outs and different behaviors based on certain variables. Might be worth a packet capture.
Also, it seems the version of Visual Voicemail I am using is not applicable for 7960s so perhaps it's a new version that may offer some speed enhancements you might be interested in. I think this is what we are using here:
<a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cupa/visual_voicemail/7.1/english/release/vivoReleaseNote71.html">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cupa/visual_voicemail/7.1/english/release/vivoReleaseNote71.html</a>
It also had an interesting note regarding SIP:
----------------------------------------------
Visual Voicemail and 7941G, 7941G-GE, 7961G, 7961G-GE, 7970G, 7971G-GE Phones with SIP
Visual Voicemail requires significant resources to perform efficiently. The SIP signaling protocol also requires more resources than the SCCP protocol. If your phones already require significant resources, for example, if the phones run other applications, contain key expansion modules, and a localization, Visual Voicemail might not perform reliably.
This is particularly true when SIP is used on the following Cisco Unified IP Phones:
*7941G
*7941G-GE
*7961G
*7961G-GE
*7970G
*7971G-GE"
----------------------------------------------
HTH
-Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Voice Noob [mailto:<a href="mailto:voicenoob@gmail.com">voicenoob@gmail.com</a>]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 5:02 PM
To: 'Charles Goldsmith'; Chris Ward (chrward)
Cc: 'voip puck'
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
I agree on the slowness of the JAVA visual voicemail.
-----Original Message-----
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Charles Goldsmith
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:37 PM
To: Chris Ward (chrward)
Cc: voip puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
It's a good first start, and as long as its a seamless move (ie, like
the CME), it should suffice.
About the slowness of the java, I was specificially referring to the
visual voicemail. On my 7975, when I hit the services button, select
the visual voicemail app and hit select, it will take 4 to 5 seconds
to load the app. On a 7960 on the CME, hitting Service, then
Selecting the visual voicemail is quick, less than half a second.
I understand features on the newer phones, but there are faster ways
to program than always using Java, and Cisco is bad about using it too
much.
I'm not trying to start a flame war about what is the best language,
and I understand why they use Java for the portability, but its
notorious for slowness.
Charles
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Chris Ward (chrward)
wrote:
> Charles,
>
> Just learned of a feature called "Dusting" or "Call Move" which will be
released in CUCM 8.0 that will allow you to push a call to your desk phone
from the cell phone without MOH being heard. So it's not perfect but better.
>
> -Chris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Chris Ward
(chrward)
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 4:03 PM
> To: Charles Goldsmith
> Cc: voip puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
>
> Ah, I was missing the part about the 7960 (non-java).
>
> So yes, you are limited there. But you are going to be limited in
basically all the new features also.
>
> I use a 7975 and don't experience any type of slowness (or don't think I
do). Are there specific areas of phone usage you experience the slowness? I
honestly haven't noticed any peppiness issues on the Java phone with the
exception of pre-dialing, which was fixed when we introduced en-bloc dialing
a little while ago.
>
> Let me know. Thanks Charles!
>
> -Chris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:<a href="mailto:wokka@justfamily.org">wokka@justfamily.org</a>]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:58 PM
> To: Chris Ward (chrward)
> Cc: voip puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
>
> Thanks Chris. ? I did play around with the Maximum wait time, but my
> users (and CIO) prefer the hangup method over using the code.
>
> About visual voicemail, from what I've read, it's not supported on the
> non-java phones, and all of my users have 7960G phones. ?The CME/CUE
> combo offered a nice, quick application for visual voicemail. ?The few
> people who have 7975G don't like the slowness of the java app (me
> being one of them).
>
> I will certainly give this feedback to my Cisco account manager.
>
> Thanks
> Charles
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Chris Ward (chrward)
wrote:
>> Hi Charles,
>>
>> You are correct in your understanding. One thing that *may* help is the
>> following:
>>
>> On the user config page in CCMAdmin, under the mobility settings, there
>> is a parameter called " Maximum Wait Time for Desk Pickup". Setting this
>> to 0 will disable the automatic call hold when you hang up on your desk
>> phone. So when you want to flat-out end a call, you can just hang up.
>> Now, if you want to transfer the call to your desk phone, you can still
>> use the *81 feature and can pick it up on the desk phone.
>>
>> Also, not sure why you can't get visual voicemail. My CUCM phone has it
>> running, although I am not sure what the CUCM versions or apps are
>> behind as I don't have visibility into that cluster.
>>
>> I will pass this feedback along as the CME method does seem a little
>> nicer than the CUCM method, but really, you should provide this feedback
>> to your account team. Good luck!
>>
>> -Chris
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
>> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Charles
>> Goldsmith
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:24 PM
>> To: voip puck
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
>>
>> Mobile connect (Single Number Reach) on the CM (7.1.2) has me a bit
>> baffled. ?When the call goes through to the cell, and is answered, no
>> problems there, however, when you want to pick up the line on your
>> desk, there is no button to do so. ?You have to hang up the cell
>> phone, which puts the call on hold on your desk, or use the enterprise
>> feature codes (for example, *81 to hold) and put the call on hold,
>> then pick it up on the desk phone.
>>
>> Details on this configuration are found at
>> <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f</a>
>> smobmgr.html
>>
>> Is there no better way to handle this? ?The end user is going to hear
>> on-hold music either way. ? On a CME, the desk phone gets a resume
>> button because the call seems to be on-hold during SNR, and you can
>> switch it from mobile to desk seamlessly with no clicks, blips, or
>> on-hold music.
>>
>> Our CIO doesn't like our "upgrade" from CME to CM because of this
>> feature, and the loss of visual voicemail (another issue outside the
>> scope of this topic).
>>
>> Any help would be appreciated.
>>
>> Charles
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
------------------------------
Message: 22
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:50:36 -0500
From: anand
To: Robert Knapp
Cc: "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>"
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] installing windows server 2008 standard on
hp server
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:2b1167120910061450w5cb73fc5gcfadeb2feae59843@mail.gmail.com">2b1167120910061450w5cb73fc5gcfadeb2feae59843@mail.gmail.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
Can i directly boot the dvd from the drive as you are mentioning that smart
start is already installed.Does it affect in anyway if i directly boot the
image rather than using step by step process of hp smart start.
thanks,
anand.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Robert Knapp wrote:
> I had a similar issue with win2k3r2. The disk was bad.
>
> If it?s a HP, smart start is already installed?
>
>
>
> Change the array to best practice
>
> Install windows, add smart start drivers
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Robert Knapp
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] *On Behalf Of *anand
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 06, 2009 4:12 PM
> *To:* <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] installing windows server 2008 standard on hp
> server
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have an HP proliant 360 server.I am planning to install windows server
> 2008 on the server.I started with HP smartnet cd which aks me to upload the
> dvd image file .When i tried to open the file and choose continue it says
> *'a valid cd image 1 is required to continue*".
>
>
>
> I gave correct product key which i got from windows.I downloaded the image
> file from microsoft.Can someone help me to figure out the problem.
>
>
>
> thanks,
>
> anand.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 23
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:09:12 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (US)"
To:
Subject: [cisco-voip] 7962 Registration Issues with 7.1.2.32014-1 ?
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
We are building new out of box 7962's come from factory running 8.3(2)
and are having registration issues with your 7962/7915s. Our production
CallManager is running 7.1.2.32014-1 and the Device Defaults for 7962
are SCCP42.8-5-2SR1S
When the 7962's initially boot and go out to load the firmware, it will
immeidately get an "auth fail". We are using SCCP Non-Secure Mode. In
some instances, the phone will fail to load the firmware but will still
register however not many of the functions will work. I've seen one
instance where the phone actually came up with the right configuration
yet, in Call manager it didn't even show registered. The status was
"unknown".
What we did earlier this morning was pointed a test 7962 to another
7.1(2) cluster and let the phone auto-register and pull the correct
load. Once the phone came back up and auto-registered to the other
cluster then we just reset the phone dhcp settings to enabled so that
the phones would re-register back to the first cluster. Once we did
this then the phones would be able to register fine to the original
cluster.
Under the phone configuration in the device information box, the
"Active Load ID" will be unknown. When you see this you will either
have problems with the 7962 coming up properly issues with the Sidecar
if you have a sidecar.
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 4673 bytes
Desc: CompuServe GIF graphic
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 24
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:19:19 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (US)"
To:
Subject: [cisco-voip] Nortel Translator
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Does Cisco internally have a way or secret tool to export the data from
a Nortel Option 81 so it can be imported into CallManager ?
I've got a site with 2600 Nortel handsets, looking for some secret
sauce that has been hidden in the closet in RTP.
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 25
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:34:33 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (US)"
To: "Jason Aarons (US)"
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Resolved: 7962 Registration Issues with
7.1.2.32014-1 ?
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
8.3(2) can not be upgraded to 8-5-2SR1S . they can however be upgraded
to 8-5-2S. Upgrade them first to 8-5-2S and then 8-5-2SR1S.
Reference for 8.5(2)
<a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/firmware/8_5_2/english/release/notes/7900_852SR1.html">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/firmware/8_5_2/engl
ish/release/notes/7900_852SR1.html</a>
For all SCCP firmware upgrades from firmware release versions earlier
than 8.3(3) to version 8.5(2)SR1 or greater, you must first upgrade your
firmware to version 8.5(2). Once you have upgraded to version 8.5(2),
you can upgrade your IP Phone to version 8.5(2)SR1 or later.
Reference for 8.5(3) (future)
<a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/firmware/8_5_3/english/release/notes/7900_853.html">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/firmware/8_5_3/engl
ish/release/notes/7900_853.html</a>
For all SCCP firmware upgrades from firmware release versions earlier
than 8.3(3) to version 8.5(3) or greater, you must first upgrade your
firmware to version 8.5(2). Once you have upgraded to version 8.5(2),
you can upgrade your IP Phone to version 8.5(3) or later
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons
(US)
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 7:09 PM
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] 7962 Registration Issues with 7.1.2.32014-1 ?
Importance: High
We are building new out of box 7962's come from factory running 8.3(2)
and are having registration issues with your 7962/7915s. Our production
CallManager is running 7.1.2.32014-1 and the Device Defaults for 7962
are SCCP42.8-5-2SR1S
When the 7962's initially boot and go out to load the firmware, it will
immeidately get an "auth fail". We are using SCCP Non-Secure Mode. In
some instances, the phone will fail to load the firmware but will still
register however not many of the functions will work. I've seen one
instance where the phone actually came up with the right configuration
yet, in Call manager it didn't even show registered. The status was
"unknown".
What we did earlier this morning was pointed a test 7962 to another
7.1(2) cluster and let the phone auto-register and pull the correct
load. Once the phone came back up and auto-registered to the other
cluster then we just reset the phone dhcp settings to enabled so that
the phones would re-register back to the first cluster. Once we did
this then the phones would be able to register fine to the original
cluster.
Under the phone configuration in the device information box, the
"Active Load ID" will be unknown. When you see this you will either
have problems with the 7962 coming up properly issues with the Sidecar
if you have a sidecar.
________________________________
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 26
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:43:44 -0500
From: "Philip Walenta"
To: "'Jason Aarons \(US\)'" ,
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Nortel Translator
Message-ID: <004501ca46e7$395e1fe0$ac1a5fa0$@<a href="http://rr.com">rr.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I want to say Clarus Systems has a tool that does this. I know someone had
a tool that did this if not them.
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (US)
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 6:19 PM
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Nortel Translator
Does Cisco internally have a way or secret tool to export the data from a
Nortel Option 81 so it can be imported into CallManager ?
I've got a site with 2600 Nortel handsets, looking for some secret sauce
that has been hidden in the closet in RTP.
_____
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you
are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and
that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting
it from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 27
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 21:02:35 -0400
From: "Matt Slaga (US)"
To: Philip Walenta , "Jason Aarons (US)"
, "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>"
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Nortel Translator
Message-ID:
<5FE225375F6E3F4493474B90BC1B94EFB953F39FFE@USISPCLEXDB01.na.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Unimax and a few others. Not inexpensive though.
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Philip Walenta
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:44 PM
To: Jason Aarons (US); <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Nortel Translator
I want to say Clarus Systems has a tool that does this. I know someone had a tool that did this if not them.
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (US)
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 6:19 PM
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Nortel Translator
Does Cisco internally have a way or secret tool to export the data from a Nortel Option 81 so it can be imported into CallManager ?
I've got a site with 2600 Nortel handsets, looking for some secret sauce that has been hidden in the closet in RTP.
________________________________
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 28
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:35:50 -0400
From: Adam Frankel
To: Scott Kee
Cc: cisco-voip mailinglist
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] adding subscriber in the CUCM cluster
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:4ACBF076.8060202@cisco.com">4ACBF076.8060202@cisco.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
You could try activating the "Cisco CallManager" service on the Subscriber.
Adam
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [cisco-voip] adding subscriber in the CUCM cluster
From: Scott Kee
To: cisco-voip mailinglist
Date: 10/6/09 12:48 PM
I am trying to setup a test CUCM cluster in my test lab. I?ve setup
CUCM Publisher and Subscriber using VMware v2.
I tweaked MAC Addresses so both Publisher and Subscriber has MAC address
as production server.
I installed License keys so CUCM has 2 server and devices licenses. So
I think I am good as far as licenses concern.
I installed Publisher and works fine however I installed Subscriber but
it is not showing up in the CUCM Group.
It only shows Publisher. I configured subscriber in the System->Server
and System->Cisco Unified UM before I installed Subscriber.
Do I need to change anything after the installation?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
------------------------------
Message: 29
Date: 7 Oct 2009 00:53:00 +0000
From: "Carter, Bill"
To:
Subject: [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question
Message-ID: <0ab801ca46f1$fc5e3179$<a href="mailto:610010ac@sentinel.com">610010ac@sentinel.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Utf-8"
Lets say a fictitous company, lets call them Bay Networks, produced a new networking device with a mini-usb console port, how long of a USB-to-miniUSB cable could I buy of the shelf?
------------------------------
Message: 30
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 22:14:47 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (US)"
To: "Carter, Bill" ,
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Serial_Bus#Maximum_useful_distanc">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Serial_Bus#Maximum_useful_distanc</a>
e
-----Original Message-----
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Carter, Bill
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:53 PM
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question
Lets say a fictitous company, lets call them Bay Networks, produced a
new networking device with a mini-usb console port, how long of a
USB-to-miniUSB cable could I buy of the shelf?
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
------------------------------
Message: 31
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 21:18:55 -0500
From: "Carter, Bill"
To: "Jason Aarons (US)" ,
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Good news....Wal-Mart has it.
$10 for 2 meters.
Even better, I can add it to my wedding registry in just 1-click! My
wife of 15 years will be pleased.
<a href="http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=11962586">http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=11962586</a>
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Aarons (US) [mailto:<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 9:15 PM
To: Carter, Bill; <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Serial_Bus#Maximum_useful_distanc">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Serial_Bus#Maximum_useful_distanc</a>
e
-----Original Message-----
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Carter, Bill
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:53 PM
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question
Lets say a fictitous company, lets call them Bay Networks, produced a
new networking device with a mini-usb console port, how long of a
USB-to-miniUSB cable could I buy of the shelf?
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
------------------------------
Message: 32
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 21:23:05 -0500
From: "Philip Walenta"
To: "'Carter, Bill'" ,
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question
Message-ID: <005301ca46f5$1addb630$50992290$@<a href="http://rr.com">rr.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I do 25ft on one of my printers ;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Carter, Bill
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 7:53 PM
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question
Lets say a fictitous company, lets call them Bay Networks, produced a new
networking device with a mini-usb console port, how long of a USB-to-miniUSB
cable could I buy of the shelf?
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
------------------------------
Message: 33
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 21:22:17 -0500
From: "Carter, Bill"
To: "Philip Walenta" ,
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
This new option from "Bay Networks" gets better every minute!
-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Walenta [mailto:<a href="mailto:pwalenta@wi.rr.com">pwalenta@wi.rr.com</a>]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 9:23 PM
To: Carter, Bill; <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question
I do 25ft on one of my printers ;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Carter, Bill
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 7:53 PM
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question
Lets say a fictitous company, lets call them Bay Networks, produced a
new
networking device with a mini-usb console port, how long of a
USB-to-miniUSB
cable could I buy of the shelf?
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
------------------------------
Message: 34
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jeff
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:284348.85626.qm@web111112.mail.gq1.yahoo.com">284348.85626.qm@web111112.mail.gq1.yahoo.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hey guys, I'm hoping to pass the CCIE Voice written exam in the next couple of weeks. How long is the waiting list for the lab exam? My boss wants to know for scheduling purposes next year.
Thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 35
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:17:57 +0000 (GMT)
From: Arnold Lesar
To: VoIPgroup
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CRS Development interuption?
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:347493.61310.qm@web26304.mail.ukl.yahoo.com">347493.61310.qm@web26304.mail.ukl.yahoo.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Dear group,
thanks for help with my prompt (P[])problem guys,it works well...
and now i wanna ask about interuption in auto attendant.
this the scenario:
first user listen the welcome prompt:
"welcome to "MYCOMPANY" for service in BAHASA please press 1......(SILENT) thank you for calling "MYCOMPANY" please press the extension.. bla..bla..bla"
user don't care about this opening prompt(option prompt), he just want to press the extension that user want.
because user had to press any number and then the extension.
how to handle this problem?
GBU
Regards,
Arnold Samuel Lesar
------------------------------------------------------
Note: This message was created by ARNOLD SAMUEL LESAR.
------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PT. PELITA RELIANCE INTERNATIONAL
Eka Hospital BSD City, Tangerang
Address : CBD Lot IX, BSD City, Tangerang
Phone : (+62-21) 256 555 55
Fax : (+62-21) 256 555 44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________
From: "Robben, John"
To: Arnold Lesar
Sent: Tuesday, 6 October, 2009 21:50:22
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Cisco CRS Development prompt problem.
Arnold,
I'd highly recommend that you download and read the
following 3 documents from the Cisco website.
Volume 1: Getting Started with Scripts for CUCCX
7.0.pdf
Volume 2: Editor Step Reference Guide for CUCCX
7.0.pdf
Volume 3: Expression Language Reference Guide for CUCCX
7.0.pdf
In Volume 1, Chapter 12, the creation of the aa.aef script
is covered in detail.
If you've copied the default aa.aef script, and modified
it, you'll need to do the following to get it to work:
1) Either download the script from
the server to your local machine using the appadmin -> script management page
and save it to a new name - or - open the script in the CUCCX editor and save it
to your local machine under a new name.
2) Make the changes that you need to
make. Validate, and save the script to your local
machine.
3) Upload the modified script to the
server using the appadmin -> script management page. (Don't forget to
refresh).
4) Using the appadmin -> application
management page, change your application to use the new script. (Don't forget to
refresh).
Once you've got the new script tied to the application, you
can perform a Reactive Debug of the script/application using the CUCCX Editor to
verify functionality.
There are not really any Cisco Press, or third party books
on CUCCX. The 3 files above, and the other pdf files available on
Cisco.com, combined with the mailer are really the only options, other than
Cisco or Cisco certified partner training classes. TAC does not provide
support for custom scripting, and will point you to the
mailer.
Regards,
John
________________________________
From: Arnold Lesar
[mailto:<a href="mailto:arnoldlesar@yahoo.co.uk">arnoldlesar@yahoo.co.uk</a>]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009
8:53
To: Robben, John
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CRS
Development prompt problem.
Dear
john,
thanks for your help,
in the welcome prompt it works,i've been
trying when i first time modify welcomePrompt, but when i trying to modify
callBusy prompt it couldn't work.so i try to create a new parameter and it work
well.
when i'm succeded with my copyofaa.aef, now i try to modify myaafiles.aef, my first step is create a new
parameter(same step with copyofaa.aef) but it couldn't work.
did i need to
another step like validate, debug or i need another step to compile the
CRS??
NOTE
:
Before i modified aa.aef
i've create a copy.
GBU
Regards,
Arnold Samuel Lesar
------------------------------------------------------
Note: This
message was created by ARNOLD SAMUEL
LESAR.
------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PT.
PELITA RELIANCE INTERNATIONAL
Eka Hospital BSD City, Tangerang
Address :
CBD Lot IX, BSD City, Tangerang
Phone : (+62-21) 256 555 55
Fax :
(+62-21) 256 555 44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________
From: "Robben, John"
To: Arnold Lesar
Sent: Tuesday, 6 October, 2009
19:12:24
Subject: RE:
[cisco-voip] Cisco CRS Development prompt problem.
Arnold,
I hope you get these screen shots. I recently went
through this myself.
NOTE: DON'T MODIFY SYSTEM PROMPTS.
THEY'LL BE OVERWRITTEN WHEN YOU UPGRADE/PATCH.
1) Prompts. a "User" prompt will be
located, and called, in a different manner than a "System" prompt.
Example:
The above shows the prompt directory
structure.
The below shows the AA directory. This is determined
by my codec(G711), and language(en_US).
2) The aa.aef default script.
Custom welcome message.
First, copy
the default script. DO NOT MODIFY THE SYSTEM SUPPLIED SCRIPT. MAKE A
COPY AND MODIFY THAT.
We see
here, that the welcome prompt is a parameter variable:
This
means that we can change it at runtime, on the appadmin page. Simply check
the box next to the prompt, and point it to a different prompt. Then click
update.
This
assumes the following prompt structure on disk. Yours may
vary.
Hope
this helps.
John
________________________________
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Arnold
Lesar
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 20:41
To: VoIPgroup
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CRS Development prompt
problem.
Dear
Jhon,
actually i'm new guy in VoIP 'couse my company ask me to modify
auto attendant company.
thanks for the answer.
so, it means, that first i
have to upload prompt next step i called in CRS Editor
is it
true?
because i try to use P[C:\AA\file.wav] or P[\AA\file.wav] it couldn't
work.
thx
Regards,
Arnold Samuel Lesar
------------------------------------------------------
Note: This
message was created by ARNOLD SAMUEL
LESAR.
------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PT.
PELITA RELIANCE INTERNATIONAL
Eka Hospital BSD City, Tangerang
Address :
CBD Lot IX, BSD City, Tangerang
Phone : (+62-21) 256 555 55
Fax :
(+62-21) 256 555 44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________
From: "Robben, John"
To: Arnold Lesar
Sent: Tuesday, 6 October, 2009
0:15:49
Subject: RE:
[cisco-voip] Cisco CRS Development prompt problem.
Arnold,
SP[] is a "System" prompt, and should not be
modified.
You can upload "User" prompts (P[]) by using the prompt
management portion located on the Appadmin page, and modify your script
accordingly.
Regards,
John
________________________________
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Arnold
Lesar
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 3:19
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco CRS Development
prompt problem.
Dear
all,
i have some problem with crs editor.
this is the problem :
i
just wanna try to modify my IVR with cisco CRS Editor ver 4.0. i'm start with
aa.aef file, first i want to modify a prompt SP[], but i can not change that
prompt. does anyone knows about this prompt? and how to insert .wav file into
crs editor so i can use .wav my file?
thanks for your help guys.
Regards,
Arnold Samuel Lesar
________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any attachments are from the
NAIC and are intended only for the addressee. Information contained herein is
confidential, and may be privileged or exempt from disclosure pursuant to
applicable federal or state law. This message is not intended as a waiver of the
confidential, privileged or exempted status of the information transmitted.
Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution or use of such
information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the
addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the
delivery error by e-mail or by calling the NAIC Help Desk at (816)783-8500.
________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any attachments are from the
NAIC and are intended only for the addressee.. Information contained herein is
confidential, and may be privileged or exempt from disclosure pursuant to
applicable federal or state law. This message is not intended as a waiver of the
confidential, privileged or exempted status of the information transmitted.
Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution or use of such
information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the
addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the
delivery error by e-mail or by calling the NAIC Help Desk at (816)783-8500.
________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any attachments are from the NAIC and are intended only for the addressee. Information contained herein is confidential, and may be privileged or exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable federal or state law. This message is not intended as a waiver of the confidential, privileged or exempted status of the information transmitted. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or by calling the NAIC Help Desk at (816)783-8500.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 36
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:21:01 -0700
From: "Chris Ward (chrward)"
To: "Jeff" ,
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82B08D508F1@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com">75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82B08D508F1@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Probably depends on your location, but I recently got in for my recert
(which is the written) in less than 3 weeks.
-Chris
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 10:47 PM
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling
Hey guys, I'm hoping to pass the CCIE Voice written exam in the next
couple of weeks. How long is the waiting list for the lab exam? My
boss wants to know for scheduling purposes next year.
Thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 37
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:27:30 -0400
From: Daniel Rodriguez
To: Jeff , "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>"
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:0789A7DD55CE174EB6D97F57422151A403E26F1B73@nyc-exch03.fidelus.com">0789A7DD55CE174EB6D97F57422151A403E26F1B73@nyc-exch03.fidelus.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Depends on where you plan on taking it. I know you shouldn't have a hard time reserving a seat at RTP. Not sure about San Jose though..
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 10:47 PM
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling
Hey guys, I'm hoping to pass the CCIE Voice written exam in the next couple of weeks. How long is the waiting list for the lab exam? My boss wants to know for scheduling purposes next year.
Thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 38
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:29:17 -0400
From: Wes Sisk
To: Subhrojyoti Banerjee
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:4ACC97AD.2000503@cisco.com">4ACC97AD.2000503@cisco.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"
Busted. I was not completely forthcoming with the rest of the
communication: "CCBU/UCBU have a variant that is still 2 CPU."
CCBU is basically all contact center products UCCX, UCCE, IP-IVR, etc.
UCBU is Unity, Unity Connection meetingplace, CUPS, CUMA
/Wes
On Tuesday, October 06, 2009 5:13:21 PM, Subhrojyoti Banerjee
wrote:
>
> Hi Wes,
>
> I posted the same question today, but had another related query.
> Although it's pretty interesting fact, but it's a bit in contradiction
> to what has been said about this before. This concept comes up in the
> UCCE 7.5 BOM, where it says-
>
> *********(Pg 12)***********************
> Central Processing Unit
> Each individual core in a multi-core processor does not count as a
> processor towards server requirements given in Appendix A ? Server
> Classes. A processor is considered a single physical CPU, regardless
> of the number of cores.
>
> ***************************************
>
> But if a single E5540 processor quad core Nehalem processor can
> function as a "7845" equivalent - with the number of supported phones
> in line with the 7845 figures (of course with 4+GB and 4 x 140GB
> drives), then that's a competitive piece of hardware. What do you think?
>
> Thanks,
> Subhrojyoti
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:58:03 -0400
> From: <a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>
> To: <a href="mailto:wsisk@cisco.com">wsisk@cisco.com</a>
> CC: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk
>
> that's kinda cool. save the cost of a CPU. should make the total cost
> a bit cheaper.
>
> i guess UCCE, Connection, etc, require the additional quad core CPU to
> sustain the higher device loads.
>
> thanks for chiming in. ;)
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wes Sisk"
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi"
> Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list"
> Sent: Monday, October 5, 2009 5:52:33 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk
>
> Confirmed, it is a single quad core instead of 2 dual cores.
> Intentional and by design.
>
> /Wes
>
> On Monday, October 05, 2009 5:32:03 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi
> wrote:
>
> hoping the cisco folk can chime in here...the latest swonly specs
> for the HP servers show that the 7845 equivalent (not really, but
> the one that serves 7500 units) is only one CPU, unlike the high
> availability servers for connection which has two CPUs.
>
> was there an error in the docs or is the 7500 device server really
> only one CPU?
>
> i'm hoping some internal training reflects the correct stats.
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 39
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:40:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi
To: Wes Sisk
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:1485871332.11910221254922849510.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca">1485871332.11910221254922849510.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Interesting. Back to CUCM...the price list references GL380 single CPU and dual CPU for prices, basically about double the cost. I guess they will have to modify this for the G6 to say 2.0Ghz and 2.5 Ghz.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wes Sisk"
To: "Subhrojyoti Banerjee"
Cc: <a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>, <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 9:29:17 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk
Busted. I was not completely forthcoming with the rest of the communication: "CCBU/UCBU have a variant that is still 2 CPU."
CCBU is basically all contact center products UCCX, UCCE, IP-IVR, etc. UCBU is Unity, Unity Connection meetingplace, CUPS, CUMA
/Wes
On Tuesday, October 06, 2009 5:13:21 PM, Subhrojyoti Banerjee wrote:
Hi Wes,
I posted the same question today, but had another related query. Although it's pretty interesting fact, but it's a bit in contradiction to what has been said about this before. This concept comes up in the UCCE 7.5 BOM, where it says-
*********(Pg 12)***********************
Central Processing Unit
Each individual core in a multi-core processor does not count as a processor towards server requirements given in Appendix A ? Server Classes. A processor is considered a single physical CPU, regardless of the number of cores.
***************************************
But if a single E5540 processor quad core Nehalem processor can function as a "7845" equivalent - with the number of supported phones in line with the 7845 figures (of course with 4+GB and 4 x 140GB drives), then that's a competitive piece of hardware. What do you think?
Thanks,
Subhrojyoti
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:58:03 -0400
From: <a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>
To: <a href="mailto:wsisk@cisco.com">wsisk@cisco.com</a>
CC: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk
that's kinda cool. save the cost of a CPU. should make the total cost a bit cheaper.
i guess UCCE, Connection, etc, require the additional quad core CPU to sustain the higher device loads.
thanks for chiming in. ;)
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wes Sisk"
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi"
Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list"
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2009 5:52:33 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk
Confirmed, it is a single quad core instead of 2 dual cores. Intentional and by design.
/Wes
On Monday, October 05, 2009 5:32:03 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
hoping the cisco folk can chime in here...the latest swonly specs for the HP servers show that the 7845 equivalent (not really, but the one that serves 7500 units) is only one CPU, unlike the high availability servers for connection which has two CPUs.
was there an error in the docs or is the 7500 device server really only one CPU?
i'm hoping some internal training reflects the correct stats.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 40
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:13:49 -0400
From: Daniel Rodriguez
To: Jeff , "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>"
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:0789A7DD55CE174EB6D97F57422151A403E26F1B98@nyc-exch03.fidelus.com">0789A7DD55CE174EB6D97F57422151A403E26F1B98@nyc-exch03.fidelus.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
There was a several month waiting period because everyone wanted to attempt the lab before the new blueprint went live.
From: Jeff [mailto:<a href="mailto:jeffeloy@yahoo.com">jeffeloy@yahoo.com</a>]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 10:04 AM
To: Daniel Rodriguez; <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling
Either San Jose or RTP would work. I was under the impression there was a several month wait list though. Is that not correct?
Thanks, Jeff
________________________________
From: Daniel Rodriguez
To: Jeff ; "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>"
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 8:27:30 AM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling
Depends on where you plan on taking it. I know you shouldn?t have a hard time reserving a seat at RTP. Not sure about San Jose though..
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 10:47 PM
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling
Hey guys, I'm hoping to pass the CCIE Voice written exam in the next couple of weeks. How long is the waiting list for the lab exam? My boss wants to know for scheduling purposes next year.
Thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 41
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:25:48 -0400
From: Pat Hayes
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] connection bugs?
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:1e877ff90910070725w812a3b5nd2005089c71c0332@mail.gmail.com">1e877ff90910070725w812a3b5nd2005089c71c0332@mail.gmail.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Are you also using LDAP for authentication? If you have confirmed that
it is actually the CuImapSvr process that is chewing up CPU, you
should get a TAC case open. We've seen a few instances of similar
circumstances that are currently under investigation.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> just wondering if the Cisco folk out there have any insight to the
> following.
>
> there seems to be another SSL bug in Unity Connection, where the CPU creeps
> up after IMAP/SSL connections start. in less than three days, CPU goes from
> 1% to 25%. it eventually goes up to 99%. i've seen this one CSCta02379: IMAP
> server leaks memory when TLS/SSL is used but that refers only to memory. i
> can't seem to find anything else.
>
> i'll be opening a case with the TAC tomorrow, but thought i'd ask.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 42
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:34:25 -0400
From: Dane Newman
To: cisco-voip
Subject: [cisco-voip] cisco unified mobility advantage
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
For lab purposes and testing can this server be run on vmware?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 43
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:12:46 -0500
From: Scott Kee
To: "'Adam Frankel'"
Cc: cisco-voip mailinglist
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] adding subscriber in the CUCM cluster
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:21712D91F95FB640822E2DFE19ADB7DB1019D6C8@CMSMAIL.Spectrumhealth.com">21712D91F95FB640822E2DFE19ADB7DB1019D6C8@CMSMAIL.Spectrumhealth.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Yep that was the issue.
Thanks for the help.
scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Frankel [mailto:<a href="mailto:afrankel@cisco.com">afrankel@cisco.com</a>]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:36 PM
To: Scott Kee
Cc: cisco-voip mailinglist
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] adding subscriber in the CUCM cluster
You could try activating the "Cisco CallManager" service on the Subscriber.
Adam
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [cisco-voip] adding subscriber in the CUCM cluster
From: Scott Kee
To: cisco-voip mailinglist
Date: 10/6/09 12:48 PM
I am trying to setup a test CUCM cluster in my test lab. I've setup
CUCM Publisher and Subscriber using VMware v2.
I tweaked MAC Addresses so both Publisher and Subscriber has MAC address
as production server.
I installed License keys so CUCM has 2 server and devices licenses. So
I think I am good as far as licenses concern.
I installed Publisher and works fine however I installed Subscriber but
it is not showing up in the CUCM Group.
It only shows Publisher. I configured subscriber in the System->Server
and System->Cisco Unified UM before I installed Subscriber.
Do I need to change anything after the installation?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
------------------------------
Message: 44
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:46:14 -0500
From: "Kim, Hyoun S"
To: ,
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco VG204/202 & Hylafax
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I recently just completed installing several Cisco VG204 & VG202
gateways at my office. We use a mix of real fax machines and a Linux
server running Hylafax. The Hylafax server is used only for receiving
faxes. No users use the Hylafax server to send faxes because we have
real physical fax machines located strategically throughout the office.
When receiving faxes to the physical fax machines, the faxes are
received just fine. However, when faxes are received to numbers
associated with the Hylafax server, we run into an issue. Some, if not
all received fax pages end up being "cut off". That is, there is random
garbage near the end of a fax page which is unreadable. However,
everything above that garbage is readable & faxed fine.
Prior to migrating to the VG gateways, all received Hylafax faxes were
normal. I'm thinking it has to do with the way my faxes are set up on
the Voice Gateway. Below is my relevant config on the VG202 (the config
is identical across all the VGs). Any ideas? I'm using SCCP for all my
phones because I was told it was the easiest & recommended way to set up
the VoIP network.
version 12.4
!
stcapp ccm-group 100
stcapp
!
stcapp feature access-code
!
voice service voip
modem passthrough nse codec g711ulaw
!
voice-card 0
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 172.21.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
no ip address
shutdown
duplex auto
speed auto
!
ip forward-protocol nd
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.21.xxx.xxx
!
voice-port 0/0
timeouts initial 60
timeouts interdigit 60
timeouts call-disconnect 3
timeouts ringing infinity
!
voice-port 0/1
timeouts initial 60
timeouts interdigit 60
timeouts call-disconnect 3
timeouts ringing infinity
!
ccm-manager fax protocol cisco
ccm-manager sccp local FastEthernet0/0
!
mgcp fax t38 ecm
mgcp behavior g729-variants static-pt
!
sccp local FastEthernet0/0
sccp ccm 172.21.xxx.xxx identifier 1 priority 1 version 7.0
sccp
!
sccp ccm group 100
associate ccm 1 priority 1
!
dial-peer voice 1000 pots
service stcapp
port 0/0
!
dial-peer voice 1001 pots
service stcapp
port 0/1
________________________________
Hyoun Kim * Network Administrator I - East Division
640 Broadmor Blvd * Suite 80 * Murfreesboro, TN 37129
' 615.217.6245 * ' 859.312.6941 * 7 615.217.6255 * *
<a href="mailto:Hyoun.Kim@chartercom.com">Hyoun.Kim@chartercom.com</a>
E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this e-mail message and
any attachments are intended solely for the
addressee(s) and may contain confidential
and/or legally privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient of this message
or if this message has been addressed to you
in error, please immediately alert the sender
by reply e-mail and then delete this message
and any attachments. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are notified that
any use, dissemination, distribution, copying,
or storage of this message or any attachment
is strictly prohibited.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1990 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 45
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:01:12 -0500
From: "Daniel Durkin"
To: "Daniel Martin" ,
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VoIP Monitoring tool
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:44B276AA34DFBC4B871C48F53BB06A0901DBFB82@DC1IVEXC01.woodforest.net">44B276AA34DFBC4B871C48F53BB06A0901DBFB82@DC1IVEXC01.woodforest.net</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Have you looked at Cacti?
It is free, though it takes some home growing.
Daniel Durkin
Woodforest National Bank
Voice Communications Engineer
<a href="mailto:ddurkin@woodforest.com">ddurkin@woodforest.com</a>
832.375.2826 Office
832.375.3826 Fax
832.326.7780 Mobile
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Daniel Martin
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 1:39 PM
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] VoIP Monitoring tool
Hi,
I would like to know what most of the people on this List are using for monitoring they VoIP/Network infrastructure.
There's two products that I'm looking at right now. One is CA EHealth for Voice and the other is Cisco Operations/Service Monitor. The CA is more expensive and would integrate into our CA Spectrum tool.
Is anybody using these tools or others? I know there is Prognosis but I think it is very expensive as well.
I would like to synthetic voice calls, monitor end-to-end voice network, monitor the Call Manager servers, provide historical reporting and do alarm notification.
Thanks,
Daniel.
Daniel Martin
Chef de Groupe - Infrastructure R?seau et T?l?com
Group Leader - Network Infrastructure and Telecom
CAE Inc.
St-Laurent, Qu?bec Canada
H4T 1G6
T?l: 1-514-341-2000 x4878
Fax: 1-514-340-5489
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 46
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:54:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi
To: Pat Hayes
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] connection bugs?
Message-ID:
<<a href="mailto:1903482165.11949061254927257171.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca">1903482165.11949061254927257171.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Yes, we're using LDAP for authentication. And I have confirmed using RTMT that CuImapSvr is the process.
I'll be opening a case shortly. Just making sure that the non-SSL config doesn't cause the same issue.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pat Hayes"
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi"
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 10:25:48 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] connection bugs?
Are you also using LDAP for authentication? If you have confirmed that
it is actually the CuImapSvr process that is chewing up CPU, you
should get a TAC case open. We've seen a few instances of similar
circumstances that are currently under investigation.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> just wondering if the Cisco folk out there have any insight to the
> following.
>
> there seems to be another SSL bug in Unity Connection, where the CPU creeps
> up after IMAP/SSL connections start. in less than three days, CPU goes from
> 1% to 25%. it eventually goes up to 99%. i've seen this one CSCta02379: IMAP
> server leaks memory when TLS/SSL is used but that refers only to memory. i
> can't seem to find anything else.
>
> i'll be opening a case with the TAC tomorrow, but thought i'd ask.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 47
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 07:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jeff
To: Daniel Rodriguez ,
"<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>"
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:807323.21719.qm@web111108.mail.gq1.yahoo.com">807323.21719.qm@web111108.mail.gq1.yahoo.com</a>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Either San Jose or RTP would work. I was under the impression there was a several month wait list though. Is that not correct?
Thanks, Jeff
________________________________
From: Daniel Rodriguez
To: Jeff ; "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>"
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 8:27:30 AM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling
Depends on where you plan on taking it. I know you shouldn?t
have a hard time reserving a seat at RTP. Not sure about San Jose though..
<a href="mailto:From%3Acisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">From:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On
Behalf Of Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 10:47 PM
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling
Hey guys, I'm hoping to pass the CCIE Voice written exam in
the next couple of weeks. How long is the waiting list for the lab
exam? My boss wants to know for scheduling purposes next year.
Thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 48
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:17:20 -0400
From: Mike Lydick
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cobras export/import to Unity 7 UM
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
We are doing a parallel upgrade of Unity 4.05 to Unity 7(Unified
Messaging/Exchange). Is it necessary to export voicemails with cobra to do a
full migration to the new Unity 7 server? If the messages are not exported,
because the message are still on the Exchange server, will the new unity
server see theses as unity voicemails?
Best Regards,
Mike Lydick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 49
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:32:20 -0500
From: Tim Fulton
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Bulk Subscription
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Is is possible to subscribe services in bulk?
What I want to do is add a service url to the second line on about 600
phones.
WhatI don't want to do is manually add the service to each device.
Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 50
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:50:38 -0500
From: "Voice Noob"
To: "'Jeff'" , "'Daniel Rodriguez'"
,
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling
Message-ID: <005401ca4765$ecfe7ad0$c6fb7070$@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Nope not anymore. The lab changed so it is not as hard to get in.
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 9:04 AM
To: Daniel Rodriguez; <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling
Either San Jose or RTP would work. I was under the impression there was a several month wait list though. Is that not correct?
Thanks, Jeff
_____
From: Daniel Rodriguez
To: Jeff ; "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>"
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 8:27:30 AM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling
Depends on where you plan on taking it. I know you shouldn?t have a hard time reserving a seat at RTP. Not sure about San Jose though..
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 10:47 PM
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling
Hey guys, I'm hoping to pass the CCIE Voice written exam in the next couple of weeks. How long is the waiting list for the lab exam? My boss wants to know for scheduling purposes next year.
Thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 51
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:51:29 -0500
From: "Voice Noob"
To: "'Mike Lydick'" ,
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cobras export/import to Unity 7 UM
Message-ID: <006501ca4766$0ab6aa20$2023fe60$@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
No you do not need to grab the voicemails.
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Mike Lydick
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 10:17 AM
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cobras export/import to Unity 7 UM
We are doing a parallel upgrade of Unity 4.05 to Unity 7(Unified
Messaging/Exchange). Is it necessary to export voicemails with cobra to do a
full migration to the new Unity 7 server? If the messages are not exported,
because the message are still on the Exchange server, will the new unity
server see theses as unity voicemails?
Best Regards,
Mike Lydick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 72, Issue 7
*****************************************
</blockquote></div><br></div>