<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Cisco will start enforcing CUBE licensing in the newer 2900/3900 routers and IOS 15.<div><br><div><div>On Nov 25, 2009, at 3:02 AM, Ali El Moussaoui wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div>I was told that i need a feature license to do the CUBE (IPIPGW) setup is that true? </div>
<div>Cant i load a an IPVOICE image and just use the feature?<br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Mark Holloway <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mh@markholloway.com">mh@markholloway.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">
<div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">It sounded like you were connecting an E1 to a TDM device and trunking IP upstream. If you're running like-for-like codecs and you're 100% IP then you don't need a PVDM module.
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="h5">
<div><br>
<div>
<div>On Nov 22, 2009, at 2:45 PM, Ali El Moussaoui wrote:</div><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">thanks for your answers I think Nicks answer is the one am looking for since i am doing H323-H323 no need for DSPs. <br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Nick Matthews <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matthnick@gmail.com" target="_blank">matthnick@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">More importantly - if you're not transcoding, you don't need the PVDM<br>at all for an IPIPGW. Be sure that we're talking about a SIP-SIP,<br>
SIP-H323, or H323-H323 connection when you say IPIPGW, which I'm<br>assuming is correct here. No voice termination, transcoding, or<br>conferencing? Don't need DSPs.<br><font color="#888888"><br>-nick<br></font>
<div>
<div></div>
<div><br>On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Mark Holloway <<a href="mailto:mh@markholloway.com" target="_blank">mh@markholloway.com</a>> wrote:<br>> PVDM2-64 will handle 32 G729 medium complexity calls. PVDM2-32 will handle 16. PVDM2-16 will handle 8. You get the idea.<br>
><br>><br>> On Nov 22, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Ali El Moussaoui wrote:<br>><br>>> Hello Group,<br>>><br>>> I am a silent watcher and this is my first post. I am planning a setup for an IPIPGW. The requirements state that the gteway must handle a full E1. My question is: how many PVDM2-64 I need? 1 or 2? note that i will be using G729 (medium complexity).<br>
>><br>>><br>>> Regards,<br>>> Ali<br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>