<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">K-12, small to medium business, with users being from under 10 up to 700. It's not for a Boeing, Lockeed, State or Fed gov. depolyment but Callmanager wasn't either when it came out.<BR><BR>--- On <B>Fri, 3/5/10, Bill Simon <I><bills@psu.edu></I></B> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><BR>From: Bill Simon <bills@psu.edu><BR>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco licensing changes...<BR>To: "cisco-voip voyp list" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><BR>Date: Friday, March 5, 2010, 11:57 AM<BR><BR>
<DIV class=plainMail>John Huston wrote:<BR>> Cisco is not crediting you for anything extra right now. While they have good product it's getting too expensive for a value to use type ratio, just like it is to run Microsoft products. We're seeing a move from Cisco to Juniper for routers and switches and then from Callmanager to Asterisk phone systems. They're cheaper to run and customers are not paying for featues they do not use often.<BR><BR>Who's your demographic?<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>cisco-voip mailing list<BR><A href="http://us.mc800.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" ymailto="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A><BR><A href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target=_blank>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></table>