<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>Exactly. Our opinion was heard, but it had no backing. We've already bought into the kool-aid. We all have SmartNet and UCSS contracts.<br><br>It's only when someone is holding off on signing the cheque when real change happens.<br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. <br> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Philip Walenta" <pwalenta@wi.rr.com><br>To: "Nick Matthews" <matthnick@gmail.com>, "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio@uoguelph.ca><br>Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 4:23:13 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Caller iD based Call routing<br><br>I find this perspective interesting considering there were millions of us<br>screaming about forwarding on non-primary lines dating back to 2001.<br><br>I'm pretty sure the opinion was heard ;-)<br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net<br>[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Matthews<br>Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 12:07 PM<br>To: Lelio Fulgenzi<br>Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Caller iD based Call routing<br><br>In the same way that a million customers with a dollar to spend is a<br>priority :)<br><br>Many of these features never move simply because of a lack of interest<br>from customers. They may be interested, but not interested enough to<br>make their voice heard. And that's exactly the priority that the<br>business unit gives it - "like but not need". I strongly suggest<br>having your opinion heard if it's something you want because it's of<br>little cost to do so.<br><br>-nick<br><br>On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio@uoguelph.ca> wrote:<br>> You could have a million customers vote a feature up. And nothing would<br>> happen.<br>><br>> Then, you could have one customer with a million dollar order on the line<br>> for forwarding secondary lines.<br>><br>> Bottom line is, money talks.<br>><br>><br>> ---<br>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>><br>><br>> ----- Original Message -----<br>> From: "Ed Leatherman" <ealeatherman@gmail.com><br>> To: "Dennis Heim" <Dennis.Heim@cdw.com><br>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:46:28 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Caller iD based Call routing<br>><br>> I bet it's in the same queue as "Call Forward Non-primary lines". I<br>> know the request was around for awhile in the CIPTUG feature request<br>> system.<br>><br>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Dennis Heim <Dennis.Heim@cdw.com> wrote:<br>>> Anyone want to setup an online petition?<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> Dennis Heim<br>>> Network Voice Engineer<br>>> CDW Advanced Technology Services<br>>> 11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225<br>>> Carmel, IN 46032<br>>><br>>> 317.569.4255 Office<br>>> 317.569.4201 Fax<br>>> 317.694.6070 Cell<br>>><br>>> dennis.heim@cdw.com<br>>> www.berbee.com<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net<br>>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Wes Sisk<br>>> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:31 AM<br>>> To: Tim Foo<br>>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Caller iD based Call routing<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> Tell your account team you need the feature documented in<br>>><br>>> CSCsy52473 ability to route call based on calling party number, cgpn<br>>><br>>> /Wes<br>>><br>>> On Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:08:05 PM, Tim Foo <kinusca@gmail.com><br>>> wrote:<br>>><br>>> Hi,<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> I have a required that based on some known Caller ID , I am supposed to<br>>> route the Call to some specific extension.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> Lets say Calls from Caller Id will go to extension 1 and from Caller iD 2<br>>> will go to extension 2 and others based on teh time of teh day<br>programming<br>>> goes to either extension 1 or 2.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> I do not have any auto-attendent configuration on the system,can I do<br>some<br>>> kind of a digit analysis on teh gateway.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> Thanks<br>>><br>>> Tim<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> ________________________________<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>><br>>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>>><br>>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>>><br>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>>><br>>><br>><br>><br>><br>> --<br>> Ed Leatherman<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>><br>><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br><br></div></body></html>