<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">UCCX 8 is now Linux based, correct?<div><br></div><div><br><div><div><div>On Mar 22, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Matthew Saskin wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>fwiw, I've got a large financial as a customer that is making a move (initially) to 8.0 for most production users with the environment then migrating to later versions end of year. This is a necessity to get past some alternate platform EOS issues, but serves as a bit of an indicator that the general level of acceptance of .0 platforms has increased. I've got a number of customers lined up to move to CUCM 8.0 and UCCX 8.0 once it's orderable as well.</div>
<div><br clear="all">Matthew Saskin<br><a href="mailto:msaskin@gmail.com">msaskin@gmail.com</a><br>203-253-9571<br><br>July 18, 2010 - 1500m swim (in the hudson), 40k bike, 10k run<br>Please support the Leukemia & Lyphoma Society<br>
<a href="http://pages.teamintraining.org/nyc/nyctri10/msaskin">http://pages.teamintraining.org/nyc/nyctri10/msaskin</a><br><br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Tanner Ezell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tanner.ezell@gmail.com">tanner.ezell@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">I think Cisco's level of QA has improved over the last couple years in<br>regards to releases. It seems like there are less and less problems.<br>
<br>I vote you go for 8 for the reasons mentioned. Additionally, you'll<br>gain valuable insight you share with us :)<br>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="h5"><br>On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>> wrote:<br>> Go with v8. Let's face it, if there's bugs in v7.1(3), you'll likely to hear<br>
> "it's fixed in v8. ;)<br>><br>> ---<br>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>><br>
><br>> ----- Original Message -----<br>> From: "Billie Brown III" <<a href="mailto:trip.brown@duke.edu">trip.brown@duke.edu</a>><br>> To: "Ed Leatherman" <<a href="mailto:ealeatherman@gmail.com">ealeatherman@gmail.com</a>><br>
> Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 12:12:42 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Is anyone using Unity Connection 8.0.1?<br>
><br>> Capacity is the big driver. We will ultimately need about 25,000<br>> subscribers. Unity connection Release 8.0 gives 20,000 subscribers and 250<br>> ports per system. We plan to have two clusters networked. We would need<br>
> three clusters if we went 7.x.<br>><br>> Also, integrated messaging does not reduce total ports and subscribers like<br>> it does in the 7.x releases. And non-IMAP Idle clients do not reduce<br>> subscribers. In Release 8.0, a port is a port. It matters not if the<br>
> subscriber is integratede with Exchange. This is per Cisco. I admit that I<br>> too have .0 reservations but it is somewhat compelling.<br>><br>> Thanks,<br>> -trip<br>><br>><br>> On 3/22/10 12:03 PM, "Ed Leatherman" <<a href="mailto:ealeatherman@gmail.com">ealeatherman@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>> I've never had good luck with .0 releases myself, at least for call<br>> manager. Normally wait till the .1 release where possible.<br>><br>> What kind of reason did Cisco give for suggesting version 8?<br>
><br>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Billie Brown III <<a href="mailto:trip.brown@duke.edu">trip.brown@duke.edu</a>><br>> wrote:<br>>> We are in the process of moving 15,000 Unity 4.2.1 subscribers and<br>
>> callhandlers to Unity Connection with the help of Cisco. We originally<br>>> decided upon Unity Connection 7.1.3 but Cisco is now recommending that we<br>>> go<br>>> ahead with Unity Connection Release 8.0.1. Is anyone using Release 8.0.1<br>
>> in<br>>> a large, active/active environment? Should we go with the brand new<br>>> release<br>>> or stay with 7.x?<br>>><br>>> Thanks,<br>>> Trip Brown<br>>> Duke University<br>
>> Office of Information Technology<br>>><br>>> Durham, NC 27701<br>>> 919-668-9228<br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>>><br>>><br>><br>><br>><br>> --<br>> Ed Leatherman<br>
><br>><br>> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br>><br><br><br><br>--<br></div></div>Cheers,<br><font color="#888888"><br>Tanner Ezell<br></font>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="h5"><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></body></html>