Keep us posted,<div><br></div><div>I have a 2921 and and VG202 (MGCP), and we're having issues with faxes as well. </div><div><br></div><div>Mike<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div><div style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">Thanks for this Nick. Documentation errors cause a bit of an issue, since that's where the TAC looks for support entitlement. This occurs mainly in the non-U.S. based support centres where if it is not on the data sheet, they're not helping. I usually get things escalated back into the U.S. and the TAC engineers are more "investigative" and help figuring things out.<br>
<br>I like the idea of SCCP since it simplifies configuration, procedures, etc. But if I need a separate stack of MGCP based VG224s for faxing, I can do that too. Not a big deal. Not sure how SRST would work in a case like that, guess I would need to create dial-peers for inbound and outbound calls. More reason for SCCP.<br>
<br>I guess I can just try configuring things on my spare VG224 and router and see how things go. Call up the TAC if I have problems and see what they say.<br><br>Thanks again, Lelio<div class="im"><br><br><br><br>-</div>
</div></div></blockquote></div></div>