And not to beat a dead horse, but faxing was never the ATA186's strong suit, I'm not sure if I would expect the 187 to resolve that.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div><div style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">I'm guessing price point. The VG202 is about 5x the cost of an ATA186.<br>
<br>There must be some additional features on the VG202 that don't come on the ATA line. Redundant uplinks is just one. Perhaps loop length is another. VG202 can do 3000 feet. Not sure if an ATA can.<div class="im"><br>
<br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. <br> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br><br><br></div><div><div></div><div class="h5">----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Brett Looney" <<a href="mailto:brett@looney.id.au" target="_blank">brett@looney.id.au</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 10:10:57 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] some EOLs...<br><br>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:rgb(31, 73, 125)">> </span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:black">just in case people haven't seen these. it looks like there is a
new</span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:rgb(31, 73, 125)"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:rgb(31, 73, 125)">> </span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:black">ATA-187 coming out soon. no data sheets on that, but it's the</span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:rgb(31, 73, 125)"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:rgb(31, 73, 125)">> </span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:black">replacement part for the EOL'ed 186.</span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:rgb(31, 73, 125)"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:rgb(31, 73, 125)"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:rgb(31, 73, 125)">Any idea what the technical differences will be between the
ATA-187 and the VG202? Why maintain two products that look like they do the
same thing?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:rgb(31, 73, 125)"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:rgb(31, 73, 125)">B.</span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:black"></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<br></div></div>_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>