<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
depends on your need. In general:<br>
<br>
1. Software bridges - G.711 only (i.e. central site ONLY deployment).
Native on CM server, some performance impact to CM. Network must be
designed for RTP streams between endpoints and CM. The cfb hosted by
IPVMS on CM supports up to 100 participants in a single conference.<br>
2. Hardware bridges - G.711 or G.729. Use for distributed
deployments. Number of participants allowed per conference varies by
the type of DSP used.<br>
3. Call Center Scripts(UCCX) - Not sure what you mean here. I am not
aware of UCCX providing conferencing resources.<br>
<br>
/Wes<br>
<br>
On Friday, April 16, 2010 9:21:40 AM, Kevin Dunn
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:cheesevoice@gmail.com"><cheesevoice@gmail.com></a> wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:r2u84b74aec1004160621i36f69e5an9a96549a87225df0@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div>Knowing about the multitude of cat skinning ways...</div>
<div> </div>
<div>When you are setting up Meet Me Conferences what is your
preferred method. We have three camps here and I am just looking for
opinions:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>1. Software bridges</div>
<div>2. Hardware bridges</div>
<div>3. Call Center Scripts (UCCX)</div>
<div> </div>
<div>What do you guys prefer?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Kevin Dunn</div>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>