What I meant was we did not hear her dialing the phone, but we heard her leaving a message for this person (since the person dialed did not answer).� All I can think is the cell phone she was calling was forwarded to a *34 speed-dial or something, and somehow we picked it up.� <br>
<br>It was so bizarre because when it happened, we called my user and told her what happened.� She figured the call didn't go through, so she placed the call again, and again, we heard her leaving the message over the intercom!� She has since tried calling other cells and POTS and none of those have gone over the intercom.� <br>
<br>When I look at recently dialed calls, all I see are the cell # she is calling (which has no 3 or 4 in it!!)� I have never seen anything like this one, but like you said, CDR might be a good place to start.<br><br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Peter Slow <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:peter.slow@gmail.com">peter.slow@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
the first thing i would do is go to the phone and look at the placed<br>
calls in the call history. have you done this?<br>
<br>
CUCM isnt going to use where teh last call was routed to �as the<br>
destination for the next call or anything like that. assuming your<br>
user didnt do something like hit the conference button to make the new<br>
call, the new call should have been completely independent of the last<br>
call.<br>
<br>
When you say �"heard the whole thing over the intercom," do you mean<br>
you heard her try to dial the called party, or do you mean that you<br>
heard both parties talking with each other over the PA?<br>
<br>
you would normally troubleshoot something like this with traces from<br>
the callmanager and debugs from the gateway, but depending on what<br>
actually ocurred, you might be able to get useful info from the CDR<br>
records.<br>
<br>
-Peter<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:51 AM, David Zhars <<a href="mailto:dzhars@gmail.com">dzhars@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I setup an intercom attachment to an FXS port.� This morning, one of my<br>
> users placed a phone call and we heard the whole thing over the<br>
> intercomm...Is it my setup?<br>
><br>
> The 2801 with FXS is in H323 mode, here's the portion for the intercom code<br>
> (we want people to dial *34 for the intercom):<br>
><br>
> dial-peer voice 55 pots<br>
> �description Paging for Fire<br>
> �destination-pattern *34<br>
> �port 0/2/0<br>
> �forward-digits all<br>
><br>
> In CCM (4.1(3)) under Route Pattern, there is a box that says "Provide<br>
> Outside Dial tone" and that has a check mark in it.� Is there anyway this<br>
> could be setup that if you dial the overhead, we also let you dial a number<br>
> and keep it going over the intercom?<br>
><br>
> How would I trace what she did do in CCM?� I think I have to wait until the<br>
> next day because CCM won't finalize the database update until the next day<br>
> (it's been a while since I've had to do one of these!)<br>
><br>
> Thanks to anyone who can offer some insight.<br>
><br>
</div></div>> _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<div class="im">> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>