I have literally setup 100s of PRIs and at least in the US have only 2 instances that i can remember where a provider has not allowed the client to pass their own CLID if its specifically requested. I actually just did a handful of new full and frac PRIs over the past 2 weeks and there was no push back whatsoever from 2 separate providers? perhaps it is provider specific and i have just been lucky?? I don't know... This is almost a mandatory requirement when clients needs to mask with a tollfree number and if this is changing I can foresee many unhappy clients. <div>
<br><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Ahmed Elnagar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ahmed_elnagar@rayacorp.com">ahmed_elnagar@rayacorp.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">I think it is very difficult to convince a provider to allow
just everything to pass from your E1’s…it is new for me to know that some
providers allows you to set caller ID on your own.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D">Best
Regards;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D"> Ahmed Elnagar</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D"> Senior Network PS
Engineer</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D"> Mob: +2019-0016211</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D"> CCIE#24697 (Voice)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D"> <img width="63" height="63" src="cid:image001.jpg@01CAFD30.5A605280" alt="ccie_voice_large.gif"><img width="63" height="63" src="cid:image002.jpg@01CAFD30.5A605280" alt="ccvp_voice_large.gif"></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt">
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Ted Nugent<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, May 26, 2010 6:53 PM</span></p><div class="im"><br>
<b>To:</b> Jason Aarons (US)<br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] SNR and caller-id - cell phone doesn't
showcustomers number but instead the office number</div><p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Historically we've just had the provider remove the
screening table (aka allow CPE to provide CLID) but if your hitting new
legislation then I can see SNR for MOST clients going into the toilet. Is q931
debug showing proper CLID on the outbound leg? if so then and the provider
refuses to work with you then I agree with the sales people its totally
useless. I've been lucky enough not to have this be a problem yet on a PRI.</p><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"> </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Jason Aarons (US) <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com" target="_blank">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>>
wrote:</p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Sales
people are asking if the original calling party number can show up when using
Mobility (SNR). So call comes into office, office dials out up to 4
locations passing the office’s caller id to the cell phone. Lots of
telcos block what caller id can come out of your PRI (usually it’s your DIDs or
the main BTN), a few will pass anything, in the case of this customer their
telco limits what they can pass to main number/DIDs.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So
the feedback from the customer is that SNR is useless for sales people as they
answer their cell phone only based upon Caller ID and now all calls from
customers show the main office phone number in caller id</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Is
there any feedback? Seems the FCC is enacting new legislation limiting what
calling party numbers can be passed out, seems a few telemarkers have been
forging their calling party number to get around call blocking equipment.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p><a href="https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2013151.pdf" target="_blank">https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2013151.pdf</a></p>
<p>This didn’t work as telco is overwriting by policy.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center">
<hr size="1" width="100%" align="center">
</div>
<p><strong>Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may
contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended
addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. </strong></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div></div></div>
<div> </div>Disclaimer: NOTICE The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Raya will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any malicious code or virus being passed on. Views expressed in this communication are not necessarily those of Raya.If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original message. </div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>