A bit off topic from the original thread but I found that setting the diversion header to a SIP trunk associated DID I could mask CLID to anything I wanted, this was another instance where the client needed to mask their 800 number and the provider said you can't do that on a SIP trunk which sent our client into a frenzy. It also works well for failover of another trunks (PRI/POTs) to SIP and the users can maintain their local CLID. No clue if this works with Verizon but it worked where I was told it wouldn't...<div>
<div><br></div><div><div>voice class sip-profiles 1</div><div> request INVITE sip-header Diversion add "Diversion:<<a href="mailto:sip%3A9195551212@192.168.0.1">sip:9195551212@192.168.0.1</a>>.*" </div><div>
<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Jason Aarons (US) <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">Verizon is a SIP provider and they only allow your DID/BTN.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">I liked the answer about CallManager 8.0+ and RDNIS, or SIP
Diversion Header </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"><a href="http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/RDNIS" target="_blank">http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/RDNIS</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"><a href="http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121rel/sipcfs/hennigan.htm" target="_blank">http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121rel/sipcfs/hennigan.htm</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt">
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Jim McBurnett</span></p><div class="im"><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, May 27, 2010 8:46 AM<br>
</div><b>To:</b> Ted Nugent; Ahmed Elnagar<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] SNR and caller-id - cell phone doesn't
showcustomers number but instead the office number</div></div><p></p>
</div>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">AT&T—Legacy BellSouth requires a letter to allow this.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">SIP providers don’t care..</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">Most CLECS in the SE US don’t care..</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">Matter of fact on a misconfigured PRI I saw the 3 digit
extensions being sent out..</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">I have heard the story of someone sending 666 as the
caller ID just to mess with someone..</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">Totally carrier dependent..</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">However there was a note somewhere about a month or so ago about
this all changing, due to some new regulations regarding fraud prevention..</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">I don’t remember the details other than not to forward
numbers that don’t belong to you in an attempt to mask your true
identity..</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">Jim</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt">
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Ted Nugent<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, May 26, 2010 6:22 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Ahmed Elnagar<br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] SNR and caller-id - cell phone doesn't
showcustomers number but instead the office number</span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I have literally setup 100s of PRIs and at least in the US
have only 2 instances that i can remember where a provider has not
allowed the client to pass their own CLID if its specifically
requested. I actually just did a handful of new full and frac PRIs over the
past 2 weeks and there was no push back whatsoever from 2 separate providers?
perhaps it is provider specific and i have just been lucky?? I don't know...
This is almost a mandatory requirement when clients needs to mask with a
tollfree number and if this is changing I can foresee many unhappy
clients. </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"> </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Ahmed Elnagar <<a href="mailto:ahmed_elnagar@rayacorp.com" target="_blank">ahmed_elnagar@rayacorp.com</a>>
wrote:</p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">I think it is very difficult to convince
a provider to allow just everything to pass from your E1’s…it is new
for me to know that some providers allows you to set caller ID on your own.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D">Best Regards;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D"> Ahmed
Elnagar</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D"> Senior
Network PS Engineer</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D"> Mob:
+2019-0016211</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D">
CCIE#24697 (Voice)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D"> <img border="0" width="63" height="63" src="cid:image001.jpg@01CAFD7E.FF825A80" alt="ccie_voice_large.gif"><img border="0" width="63" height="63" src="cid:image002.jpg@01CAFD7E.FF825A80" alt="ccvp_voice_large.gif"></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt"> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Ted Nugent<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, May 26, 2010 6:53 PM</span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<b>To:</b> Jason Aarons (US)<br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] SNR and caller-id - cell phone doesn't
showcustomers number but instead the office number</p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Historically
we've just had the provider remove the screening table (aka allow CPE to
provide CLID) but if your hitting new legislation then I can see SNR for MOST
clients going into the toilet. Is q931 debug showing proper CLID on the
outbound leg? if so then and the provider refuses to work with you then I agree
with the sales people its totally useless. I've been lucky enough not to have
this be a problem yet on a PRI.</p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"> </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On
Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Jason Aarons (US) <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com" target="_blank">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>>
wrote:</p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Sales
people are asking if the original calling party number can show up when using
Mobility (SNR). So call comes into office, office dials out up to 4
locations passing the office’s caller id to the cell phone. Lots of
telcos block what caller id can come out of your PRI (usually it’s your
DIDs or the main BTN), a few will pass anything, in the case of this customer
their telco limits what they can pass to main number/DIDs.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So
the feedback from the customer is that SNR is useless for sales people as they
answer their cell phone only based upon Caller ID and now all calls from
customers show the main office phone number in caller id</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Is
there any feedback? Seems the FCC is enacting new legislation limiting what
calling party numbers can be passed out, seems a few telemarkers have been
forging their calling party number to get around call blocking equipment.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p><a href="https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2013151.pdf" target="_blank">https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2013151.pdf</a></p>
<p>This didn’t work as telco is overwriting by policy.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center">
<hr size="1" width="100%" align="center">
</div>
<p><strong>Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may
contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended
addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. </strong></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Disclaimer: NOTICE The information contained in this message
is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received
this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator
immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this
message is strictly forbidden. Raya will not be liable for direct, special,
indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of
this message by a third party or as a result of any malicious code or virus
being passed on. Views expressed in this communication are not necessarily
those of Raya.If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately by email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy
the original message. </p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<div><p></p><hr size="1"><p></p>
<p><strong>
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
</strong></p></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>