<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">If UCCX doesn't support setting the CFUR then I would like to think it would ignore the field entirely. You can sure as heck test it, and I'd also be asking your CSE what version of UCCX will support this field in CUCM and if there is a bug to track it.<div><br><div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; "><div>-Ryan</div></span>
</div>
<br><div><div>On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Steve G wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">We are on CUCM 7.1.3 and it is supported in this version of CUCM. However, the TAC rep says it is not supported with UCCX and could cause Jtapi issues is you are not supposed to configure anything on the CTI RP in CUCM, but do it all on UCCX. Also, let's say we set the CTI RP to Forward Unregistered, and then updated Jtapi. Wouldn't that clear out the forward unregistered settings?<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Tanner Ezell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tanner.ezell@gmail.com">tanner.ezell@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
It's not really a UCCX thing. What version of UCM? If you're version<br>
supports forward on unregistered then that's all you can do..<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Steve G <<a href="mailto:smgustafson@gmail.com">smgustafson@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Anyone??? going once, going twice...<br>
><br>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Steve G <<a href="mailto:smgustafson@gmail.com">smgustafson@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> I meant CTI Route Points...not CTI Ports.<br>
>><br>
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Steve G <<a href="mailto:smgustafson@gmail.com">smgustafson@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> In UCCX is there a way to configure a CTI Port to forward Unregistered to<br>
>>> anther number...ie Hunt Pilot? We are running into an issue where CTI ports<br>
>>> become unregistered and don't recover without manual intervention of<br>
>>> updating the jtapi triggers in UCCX. We have a TAC rep saying that we can<br>
>>> not modify the CTI ports in CUCM as that is not supported. So if UCCX has a<br>
>>> jtapi problem we are dead in the water until we can login and update/resync<br>
>>> the jtapi triggers.<br>
>>> I am extremely new to UCCX so please forgive me if my terminology is<br>
>>> wacky.<br>
>>> Thanks,<br>
>>> Steve<br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div><div><div></div><div class="h5">> _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br></div><br></div></body></html>