when you say it only does this on "one gateway", what exactly do you mean? do you mean that it only happens when the call comes inbound to you on a specific gateway, or when you route the international call out a specific gateway.<br>
<br>I suspect the 91 is being added in a translation pattern that is used to route your inbound DIDs. <br><br>The easiest way to fix this would be to apply a specific transformation pattern to your outgoing gateway PRI. You could setup the transformation pattern to 91XXXXXXXXXX and then set the calling party transformation mask to XXXXXXXXXX. If you haven't used transformation patterns before, create a new partition, put the partition in a new CSS, put the new calling party transformation in the partition. Apply the CSS to the PRI in the Calling Party Transformation Mask CSS, uncheck the 'inherit device pool' setting and then reset the gateway.<br>
<br>Justin<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:45 PM, James Buchanan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jbuchanan@ctiusa.com">jbuchanan@ctiusa.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
What does your route list/route group combination look like for the<br>
route pattern?<br>
<div class="im"><br>
James Buchanan | Senior Network Engineer | South Region | Presidio<br>
Networked Solutions<br>
12 Cadillac Dr, Suite 130, Brentwood, TN 37027 | <a href="mailto:jbuchanan@presidio.com">jbuchanan@presidio.com</a><br>
D: 615-866-5729 | F: 615-866-5781 | <a href="http://www.presidio.com" target="_blank">www.presidio.com</a><br>
<<a href="http://www.presidio.com" target="_blank">http://www.presidio.com</a>><br>
CCIE #25863, Voice<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div><div class="im">-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><br>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Monica Hardy<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 4:08 PM<br>
To: Robert Kulagowski<br>
Cc: cisco-voip<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PRI Issues<br>
<br>
No, just a basic MGCP router, nothing else.<br>
<br>
I was just on the phone with TAC again.<br>
<br>
Looking through all of these debugs it looks like I only have the issue<br>
when the call comes in and then back out the same gateway. This is hard<br>
to reproduce and I think I am just going to have to take a downtime and<br>
be able to change everything and see what happens.<br>
<br>
-Monica<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Robert Kulagowski [mailto:<a href="mailto:rkulagow@gmail.com">rkulagow@gmail.com</a>]<br>
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 1:13 PM<br>
To: Monica Hardy<br>
Cc: cisco-voip<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PRI Issues<br>
<br>
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Monica Hardy <<a href="mailto:Monica.Hardy@openwave.com">Monica.Hardy@openwave.com</a>><br>
wrote:<br>
><br>
> I failed to mention with the 91 put in front of the Calling Party<br>
Number changes the plan<br>
><br>
> to a Plan:ISDN, Type:National<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> instead of a:<br>
><br>
> Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> I just don't see why and where that 91 is being added to the front of<br>
the Calling Number.<br>
<br>
Do you have a num-exp in your router configuration?<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>