<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>i may have been doing that while i testing trunk groups.<br><br>or i also suspect that we may have RMA'ed one of the T1 cards at some time. i'm guessing that could have done it as well.<br><br>there was an important dial-peer that i would have tested and confirmed working with debugs that didn't have a port assigned to it, which means it was down, which means it would never be hit.<br><br>this makes me believe it was something that happened after the fact, not from me removing ports.<br><br>thanks.<br><span><br><span name="x"></span>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. <br> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br><span name="x"></span><br></span><br><hr id="zwchr"><b>From: </b>"Paul Kruger" <pauld.kruger@gmail.com><br><b>To: </b>"Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio@uoguelph.ca><br><b>Cc: </b>"voyp list" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br><b>Sent: </b>Friday, October 8, 2010 3:34:27 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [cisco-voip] curious...what can cause a port to be removed from a dial-peer<br><br>Whoops, some weird shortcut keys sent that one pre-maturely....<div><br></div><div>What I wanted to say is: If you shut your controller and remove the pri-group timeslots from the controller, it will remove the port from the dial-peers that were configured for it.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Not sure if that answers your q?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Paul Kruger <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pauld.kruger@gmail.com" target="_blank">pauld.kruger@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">I think it's when you shut your controller and remove the pri-grou<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div></div>
<div class="h5">On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca" target="_blank">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br>
</div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div></div><div class="h5"><div><div style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">I'm just reviewing an existing router's config and noticed that half my dial-peers are missing an outbound port, namely the second PRI. Now, I could understand myself leaving a configuration like this if it was the first PRI missing from the dial-peers so that way I always had the configuration, but I'd only use the second PRI and leave the first for inbound calls. But to leave the dial-peers only with the first PRI just doesn't make sense.<br>
<br>I know that during SRST configurations are changed, and if a write mem is performed you keep those changes.<br><br>Can anything happen that would take a port out of dial peer configuration like this?<br><span><br><span></span>---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. <br> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br><span></span><br></span><br></div></div><br></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></body></html>