<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>I think they're gonna say the way to go is with normalization. Using the +.<br><br>But wait, the older phones don't support the +. Or do they..... ???<br><span><br><span name="x"></span>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. <br> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br><span name="x"></span><br></span><br><hr id="zwchr"><b>From: </b>"Mike Lydick" <mike.lydick@gmail.com><br><b>To: </b>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br><b>Sent: </b>Friday, October 29, 2010 10:07:15 AM<br><b>Subject: </b>[cisco-voip] Calling Number - Gen2 Vs Gen3 phones<br><br><div>We have setup Transformations(Calling party CSS in the device settings) to adjust calling number so the users will not have to edit dial 9 to return calls from missed and received calls. This works for 7940 and 7960 phones. On the 7970 phone the display gets the adjusted number but the call logs to not get updated number. I have tac case but they have not come back with anything significant.<br clear="all">
</div><div><br></div><div>The only thing that I can see is the older phones seem to get the number into the logs as expected but the newer phones do not?</div><div><br></div>Best Regards,<br><br>Mike Lydick<br><br><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br></div></body></html>