<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><div><span title="" style="background-color: rgb(230, 236, 249); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); ">Hello Friends, I have a doubt.<br>
</span><br></div></span></div>Cisco 2801 supports up to how many mb?</span><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="arial, sans-serif">Thanks</font></div>
<div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="arial, sans-serif" size="6"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;"><br clear="all"></span></font>Marcus A. Queiroz<br><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/12/1 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-owner@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-owner@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music (Jim Reed)<br>
2. Re: Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music (Jason Aarons (US))<br>
3. Re: Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music (Jason Aarons (US))<br>
4. Re: Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music (Jim Reed)<br>
5. tone on hold with SRST v4.1? (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br>
6. Re: Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music (Wes Sisk)<br>
7. Re: Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music (Jim Reed)<br>
8. SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7 integration<br>
(Lelio Fulgenzi)<br>
9. Re: SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7<br>
integration (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br>
10. Re: SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7<br>
integration (Mike Lydick)<br>
11. Re: SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7<br>
integration (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br>
12. Re: SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7<br>
integration (Mike Lydick)<br>
13. Re: SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7<br>
integration (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br>
14. Re: IBM 7816-I4 782x-I4 Filesystem errors (Ryan West)<br>
15. CM 4.1(3)SR8a patch install issue (Duane Priebe)<br>
16. Re: CM 4.1(3)SR8a patch install issue (Buchanan, James)<br>
17. Re: CM 4.1(3)SR8a patch install issue (Duane Priebe)<br>
18. Re: IBM 7816-I4 782x-I4 Filesystem errors (Ryan Ratliff)<br>
19. Re: SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7<br>
integration (Sandy Lee)<br>
20. Re: Anyone setup 7828-I4 CUCMBE 8 before? (Ryan Ratliff)<br>
21. Re: Anyone setup 7828-I4 CUCMBE 8 before? (Ryan West)<br>
22. Re: SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7<br>
integration (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br>
23. Re: SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7<br>
integration (Jason Aarons (US))<br>
24. Re: SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7<br>
integration (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:37:02 -0700<br>
From: Jim Reed <<a href="mailto:jreed@swiftnews.com">jreed@swiftnews.com</a>><br>
To: VoIPgroup <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:C91A925E.44E62%25jreed@swiftnews.com">C91A925E.44E62%jreed@swiftnews.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
I am using the following call consult transfer step in IPCC 4.0(5) to transfer an outside caller to a cell phone. The forwarded call is being made from a location that requires long distance codes when placing long distance calls. As the cell phone is not in the local calling area of the VoIP system, it requires a long distance call. During a brief three (3) or four (4) seconds while the forwarded call is setup, the caller is hearing hold music, then silence, then the ring to the cell phone. Is there a way to eliminate that hold music? The transition from silence to hold music to silence again to ringing may cause the caller to think they've been disconnected.<br>
<br>
Call Consult Transfer (--Triggering Contact-- to "915552220975" with "1234#")<br>
<br>
Thank You...<br>
--<br>
Jim Reed<br>
Manager of Technical Services<br>
Swift Communications, Inc.<br>
970-384-9141 (Direct)<br>
775-772-7666 (Cell)<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/6546a452/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/6546a452/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:45:49 -0500<br>
From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>><br>
To: Jim Reed <<a href="mailto:jreed@swiftnews.com">jreed@swiftnews.com</a>>, VoIPgroup<br>
<<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<4E38DB0A1959B04C8C83EDCF069B53ED0C81F59B8A@USISPCLEXDB01.na.didata.local><br>
<br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
It's using the CTI Port's Music On Hold.<br>
<br>
Record a .wav file of silence, use that for the Music On Hold on your IPCC CTI Ports.<br>
<br>
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Jim Reed<br>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 1:37 PM<br>
To: VoIPgroup<br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music<br>
<br>
I am using the following call consult transfer step in IPCC 4.0(5) to transfer an outside caller to a cell phone. The forwarded call is being made from a location that requires long distance codes when placing long distance calls. As the cell phone is not in the local calling area of the VoIP system, it requires a long distance call. During a brief three (3) or four (4) seconds while the forwarded call is setup, the caller is hearing hold music, then silence, then the ring to the cell phone. Is there a way to eliminate that hold music? The transition from silence to hold music to silence again to ringing may cause the caller to think they've been disconnected.<br>
<br>
Call Consult Transfer (--Triggering Contact-- to "915552220975" with "1234#")<br>
<br>
Thank You...<br>
--<br>
Jim Reed<br>
Manager of Technical Services<br>
Swift Communications, Inc.<br>
970-384-9141 (Direct)<br>
775-772-7666 (Cell)<br>
<br>
<br>
-----------------------------------------<br>
Disclaimer:<br>
<br>
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain<br>
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the<br>
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the<br>
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received<br>
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of<br>
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be<br>
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please<br>
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it<br>
from your computer. Thank you.<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/e1e109b2/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/e1e109b2/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 3<br>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:53:44 -0500<br>
From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>><br>
To: "Jason Aarons (US)" <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>>, Jim Reed<br>
<<a href="mailto:jreed@swiftnews.com">jreed@swiftnews.com</a>>, VoIPgroup <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<4E38DB0A1959B04C8C83EDCF069B53ED0C81F59BA1@USISPCLEXDB01.na.didata.local><br>
<br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
I should elaborate, when you do a transfer the first thing it does it puts the line on hold (where you are hearing music). It's no different then if you Transfer a call.<br>
<br>
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (US)<br>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 1:46 PM<br>
To: Jim Reed; VoIPgroup<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music<br>
<br>
It's using the CTI Port's Music On Hold.<br>
<br>
Record a .wav file of silence, use that for the Music On Hold on your IPCC CTI Ports.<br>
<br>
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Jim Reed<br>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 1:37 PM<br>
To: VoIPgroup<br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music<br>
<br>
I am using the following call consult transfer step in IPCC 4.0(5) to transfer an outside caller to a cell phone. The forwarded call is being made from a location that requires long distance codes when placing long distance calls. As the cell phone is not in the local calling area of the VoIP system, it requires a long distance call. During a brief three (3) or four (4) seconds while the forwarded call is setup, the caller is hearing hold music, then silence, then the ring to the cell phone. Is there a way to eliminate that hold music? The transition from silence to hold music to silence again to ringing may cause the caller to think they've been disconnected.<br>
<br>
Call Consult Transfer (--Triggering Contact-- to "915552220975" with "1234#")<br>
<br>
Thank You...<br>
--<br>
Jim Reed<br>
Manager of Technical Services<br>
Swift Communications, Inc.<br>
970-384-9141 (Direct)<br>
775-772-7666 (Cell)<br>
________________________________<br>
<br>
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.<br>
<br>
<br>
-----------------------------------------<br>
Disclaimer:<br>
<br>
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain<br>
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the<br>
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the<br>
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received<br>
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of<br>
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be<br>
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please<br>
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it<br>
from your computer. Thank you.<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/25aad3d2/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/25aad3d2/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 4<br>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:01:57 -0700<br>
From: Jim Reed <<a href="mailto:jreed@swiftnews.com">jreed@swiftnews.com</a>><br>
To: "Jason Aarons (US)" <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>>, VoIPgroup<br>
<<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:C91A9835.44E6E%25jreed@swiftnews.com">C91A9835.44E6E%jreed@swiftnews.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Thanks, Jason. I think that will work. I'll have to review their other scripts to see if the silence on hold will cause an issue there but I don't think so.<br>
--<br>
Jim Reed<br>
Manager of Technical Services<br>
Swift Communications, Inc.<br>
970-384-9141 (Direct)<br>
775-772-7666 (Cell)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 11/30/10 11:53 AM, "Jason Aarons (US)" <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
I should elaborate, when you do a transfer the first thing it does it puts the line on hold (where you are hearing music). It's no different then if you Transfer a call.<br>
<br>
<br>
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (US)<br>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 1:46 PM<br>
To: Jim Reed; VoIPgroup<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music<br>
<br>
It's using the CTI Port's Music On Hold.<br>
<br>
Record a .wav file of silence, use that for the Music On Hold on your IPCC CTI Ports.<br>
<br>
<br>
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Jim Reed<br>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 1:37 PM<br>
To: VoIPgroup<br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music<br>
<br>
I am using the following call consult transfer step in IPCC 4.0(5) to transfer an outside caller to a cell phone. The forwarded call is being made from a location that requires long distance codes when placing long distance calls. As the cell phone is not in the local calling area of the VoIP system, it requires a long distance call. During a brief three (3) or four (4) seconds while the forwarded call is setup, the caller is hearing hold music, then silence, then the ring to the cell phone. Is there a way to eliminate that hold music? The transition from silence to hold music to silence again to ringing may cause the caller to think they've been disconnected.<br>
<br>
Call Consult Transfer (--Triggering Contact-- to "915552220975" with "1234#")<br>
<br>
Thank You...<br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/5070917b/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/5070917b/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 5<br>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:02:21 -0500 (EST)<br>
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
To: voyp list <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] tone on hold with SRST v4.1?<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:675681003.710894.1291143741122.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca">675681003.710894.1291143741122.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
I have a v4.0 SRST installation which I swear did not have tone on hold, so I uploaded a wav file with beeps in it to mimic what we have during regular operation.<br>
<br>
I'm playing with v4.1 SRST right now, and it seems that tone on hold is now included.<br>
<br>
Nothing in the docs....<br>
<br>
Anyone realize this?<br>
<br>
Just wondering...<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/67b102db/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/67b102db/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 6<br>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:08:11 -0500<br>
From: Wes Sisk <<a href="mailto:wsisk@cisco.com">wsisk@cisco.com</a>><br>
To: Jim Reed <<a href="mailto:jreed@swiftnews.com">jreed@swiftnews.com</a>><br>
Cc: VoIPgroup <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:4CF54B9B.5080703@cisco.com">4CF54B9B.5080703@cisco.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"<br>
<br>
And let your Cisco account team know you want this implemented:<br>
<br>
CSCdw68639 Need ability to select tone on hold or silence as an MoH<br>
hold source<br>
<br>
/Wes<br>
<br>
Jim Reed wrote:<br>
> *Thanks, Jason. I think that will work. I'll have to review their<br>
> other scripts to see if the silence on hold will cause an issue there<br>
> but I don't think so.<br>
> **--<br>
> Jim Reed<br>
> Manager of Technical Services<br>
> Swift Communications, Inc.<br>
> 970-384-9141 (Direct)<br>
> 775-772-7666 (Cell)<br>
> *<br>
><br>
><br>
> On 11/30/10 11:53 AM, "Jason Aarons (US)" <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
><br>
> I should elaborate, when you do a transfer the first thing it does<br>
> it puts the line on hold (where you are hearing music). It's no<br>
> different then if you Transfer a call.<br>
><br>
><br>
> *From:* <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>]<br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>%5D> *On Behalf Of<br>
> *Jason Aarons (US)<br>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 30, 2010 1:46 PM<br>
> *To:* Jim Reed; VoIPgroup<br>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music<br>
><br>
> It's using the CTI Port's Music On Hold.<br>
><br>
> Record a .wav file of silence, use that for the Music On Hold on<br>
> your IPCC CTI Ports.<br>
><br>
><br>
> *From:* <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>]<br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>%5D> *On Behalf Of *Jim Reed<br>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 30, 2010 1:37 PM<br>
> *To:* VoIPgroup<br>
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music<br>
><br>
> *I am using the following call consult transfer step in IPCC<br>
> 4.0(5) to transfer an outside caller to a cell phone. The<br>
> forwarded call is being made from a location that requires long<br>
> distance codes when placing long distance calls. As the cell<br>
> phone is not in the local calling area of the VoIP system, it<br>
> requires a long distance call. During a brief three (3) or four<br>
> (4) seconds while the forwarded call is setup, the caller is<br>
> hearing hold music, then silence, then the ring to the cell phone.<br>
> Is there a way to eliminate that hold music? The transition from<br>
> silence to hold music to silence again to ringing may cause the<br>
> caller to think they've been disconnected.<br>
><br>
> Call Consult Transfer (--Triggering Contact-- to "915552220975"<br>
> with "1234#")<br>
><br>
> Thank You...<br>
> *<br>
><br>
> *<br>
><br>
> *<br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/4e863141/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/4e863141/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 7<br>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:12:59 -0700<br>
From: Jim Reed <<a href="mailto:jreed@swiftnews.com">jreed@swiftnews.com</a>><br>
To: Wes Sisk <<a href="mailto:wsisk@cisco.com">wsisk@cisco.com</a>><br>
Cc: VoIPgroup <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Eliminating Brief Instance of Hold Music<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:C91A9ACB.44E75%25jreed@swiftnews.com">C91A9ACB.44E75%jreed@swiftnews.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Thanks, Wes. I'm working with them on another project so I'll add this one to the list.<br>
--<br>
Jim Reed<br>
Manager of Technical Services<br>
Swift Communications, Inc.<br>
970-384-9141 (Direct)<br>
775-772-7666 (Cell)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 11/30/10 12:08 PM, "Wes Sisk" <<a href="mailto:wsisk@cisco.com">wsisk@cisco.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
And let your Cisco account team know you want this implemented:<br>
<br>
CSCdw68639 Need ability to select tone on hold or silence as an MoH hold source<br>
<br>
/Wes<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/f3b86d5d/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/f3b86d5d/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 8<br>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:36:27 -0500 (EST)<br>
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
To: voyp list <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7<br>
integration<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:1426930959.721868.1291152987205.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca">1426930959.721868.1291152987205.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
I'm working on the migration from CUCM v4.1(3) to v7.1(x).<br>
<br>
I think it would be much simpler if I am able to create a SIP trunk from CallManager v7 to Connection.<br>
<br>
Has anyone seen any huge differences between an SCCP and a SIP integration? Do things generally continue to work the same?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/30f7a51f/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/30f7a51f/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 9<br>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:54:46 -0500 (EST)<br>
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
To: voyp list <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and<br>
UCxN v7 integration<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:1760334960.725187.1291157686398.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca">1760334960.725187.1291157686398.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
Just some further information and questions...<br>
<br>
we have three hunt groups so that we can ensure that calls are processed accordingly, a group reserved for auto-attendant, a group reserved for voicemail access and a group reserved for call processing.<br>
<br>
the hunt pilots for each, progressively use the groups, so autoattendant uses all three groups, voice mail uses the voice mail and call processing groups, and call processing only uses the call processing group.<br>
<br>
I'm thinking I can simulate this with three SIP trunks and the appropriate number of ports in each SIP trunk group on Unity connection.<br>
<br>
On CallManager, I would use route lists to send calls to the group of ports over the sip trunks.<br>
<br>
The integration guide refers to the issue of having to use MTPs for older SCCP phones.<br>
<br>
Any comments would be most welcome.<br>
<br>
Lelio<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
From: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
To: "voyp list" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 4:36:27 PM<br>
Subject: SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7 integration<br>
<br>
<br>
I'm working on the migration from CUCM v4.1(3) to v7.1(x).<br>
<br>
I think it would be much simpler if I am able to create a SIP trunk from CallManager v7 to Connection.<br>
<br>
Has anyone seen any huge differences between an SCCP and a SIP integration? Do things generally continue to work the same?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/06d081cd/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/06d081cd/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 10<br>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:57:21 -0500<br>
From: Mike Lydick <<a href="mailto:mike.lydick@gmail.com">mike.lydick@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Cc: voyp list <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and<br>
UCxN v7 integration<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<AANLkTi=<a href="mailto:GjPtJuKVaO2Sgd84xbT2ToTbHmT_wF9ox%2B7t8@mail.gmail.com">GjPtJuKVaO2Sgd84xbT2ToTbHmT_wF9ox+7t8@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
>From Callmanager, there maybe few less steps. There is the benefit of not<br>
assign directory numbers for the vm ports with sip but port setup completed<br>
correctly numbers should not matter (separate partition and all that).<br>
The SIP integration is has simpler route logic and less touch points if you<br>
have to change anything.<br>
<br>
>From the Unity the SIP setup is similar to the SCCP port setup. There are a<br>
few caveats with transfer that I have not run into yet such as no MOH with<br>
supervised transfer.<br>
<br>
<br>
Best Regards,<br>
<br>
Mike Lydick<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> I'm working on the migration from CUCM v4.1(3) to v7.1(x).<br>
><br>
> I think it would be much simpler if I am able to create a SIP trunk from<br>
> CallManager v7 to Connection.<br>
><br>
> Has anyone seen any huge differences between an SCCP and a SIP integration?<br>
> Do things generally continue to work the same?<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ---<br>
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br>
><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/c3c27442/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/c3c27442/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 11<br>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:01:10 -0500 (EST)<br>
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
To: Mike Lydick <<a href="mailto:mike.lydick@gmail.com">mike.lydick@gmail.com</a>><br>
Cc: voyp list <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and<br>
UCxN v7 integration<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:783743672.725415.1291158070458.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca">783743672.725415.1291158070458.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
yes, i'm anticipating less work, but i'd still like to have three groups of ports so i can reserve ports for the various functions.<br>
<br>
the easiest thing would be to simply make one group, but i'm not sure i like the idea of not being able to control things. i'd hate to have everyone check voice mail at once after a broadcast message and then auto-attendant fails. ugh<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
From: "Mike Lydick" <<a href="mailto:mike.lydick@gmail.com">mike.lydick@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Cc: "voyp list" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 5:57:21 PM<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7 integration<br>
<br>
>From Callmanager, there maybe few less steps. There is the benefit of not assign directory numbers for the vm ports with sip but port setup completed correctly numbers should not matter (separate partition and all that).<br>
The SIP integration is has simpler route logic and less touch points if you have to change anything.<br>
<br>
<br>
>From the Unity the SIP setup is similar to the SCCP port setup. There are a few caveats with transfer that I have not run into yet such as no MOH with supervised transfer.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Best Regards,<br>
<br>
Mike Lydick<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi < <a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a> > wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
I'm working on the migration from CUCM v4.1(3) to v7.1(x).<br>
<br>
I think it would be much simpler if I am able to create a SIP trunk from CallManager v7 to Connection.<br>
<br>
Has anyone seen any huge differences between an SCCP and a SIP integration? Do things generally continue to work the same?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/cf25a29f/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/cf25a29f/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 12<br>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:02:56 -0500<br>
From: Mike Lydick <<a href="mailto:mike.lydick@gmail.com">mike.lydick@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Cc: voyp list <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and<br>
UCxN v7 integration<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<AANLkTi=<a href="mailto:7vfH6Zdo8%2B9C1gAgjTMvKW8RR%2B0%2BVsy46BFDP@mail.gmail.com">7vfH6Zdo8+9C1gAgjTMvKW8RR+0+Vsy46BFDP@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
If you are dedicating ports to these call functions, it might be best to<br>
stick with sccp. I am not sure that your going to be able to set multiple<br>
trunks to the same unity server.<br>
<br>
<br>
Best Regards,<br>
<br>
Mike Lydick<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Just some further information and questions...<br>
><br>
> we have three hunt groups so that we can ensure that calls are processed<br>
> accordingly, a group reserved for auto-attendant, a group reserved for<br>
> voicemail access and a group reserved for call processing.<br>
><br>
> the hunt pilots for each, progressively use the groups, so autoattendant<br>
> uses all three groups, voice mail uses the voice mail and call processing<br>
> groups, and call processing only uses the call processing group.<br>
><br>
> I'm thinking I can simulate this with three SIP trunks and the appropriate<br>
> number of ports in each SIP trunk group on Unity connection.<br>
><br>
> On CallManager, I would use route lists to send calls to the group of ports<br>
> over the sip trunks.<br>
><br>
> The integration guide refers to the issue of having to use MTPs for older<br>
> SCCP phones.<br>
><br>
> Any comments would be most welcome.<br>
><br>
> Lelio<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ---<br>
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------<br>
> *From: *"Lelio Fulgenzi" <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
> *To: *"voyp list" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
> *Sent: *Tuesday, November 30, 2010 4:36:27 PM<br>
> *Subject: *SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7 integration<br>
><br>
><br>
> I'm working on the migration from CUCM v4.1(3) to v7.1(x).<br>
><br>
> I think it would be much simpler if I am able to create a SIP trunk from<br>
> CallManager v7 to Connection.<br>
><br>
> Has anyone seen any huge differences between an SCCP and a SIP integration?<br>
> Do things generally continue to work the same?<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ---<br>
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br>
><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/f8c87515/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/f8c87515/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 13<br>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:04:03 -0500 (EST)<br>
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
To: Mike Lydick <<a href="mailto:mike.lydick@gmail.com">mike.lydick@gmail.com</a>><br>
Cc: voyp list <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and<br>
UCxN v7 integration<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:1785616989.725541.1291158243773.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca">1785616989.725541.1291158243773.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
oh. darn. :(<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
From: "Mike Lydick" <<a href="mailto:mike.lydick@gmail.com">mike.lydick@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Cc: "voyp list" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 6:02:56 PM<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7 integration<br>
<br>
If you are dedicating ports to these call functions, it might be best to stick with sccp. I am not sure that your going to be able to set multiple trunks to the same unity server.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Best Regards,<br>
<br>
Mike Lydick<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi < <a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a> > wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Just some further information and questions...<br>
<br>
we have three hunt groups so that we can ensure that calls are processed accordingly, a group reserved for auto-attendant, a group reserved for voicemail access and a group reserved for call processing.<br>
<br>
the hunt pilots for each, progressively use the groups, so autoattendant uses all three groups, voice mail uses the voice mail and call processing groups, and call processing only uses the call processing group.<br>
<br>
I'm thinking I can simulate this with three SIP trunks and the appropriate number of ports in each SIP trunk group on Unity connection.<br>
<br>
On CallManager, I would use route lists to send calls to the group of ports over the sip trunks.<br>
<br>
The integration guide refers to the issue of having to use MTPs for older SCCP phones.<br>
<br>
Any comments would be most welcome.<br>
<br>
Lelio<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
From: "Lelio Fulgenzi" < <a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a> ><br>
To: "voyp list" < <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> ><br>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 4:36:27 PM<br>
Subject: SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7 integration<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
I'm working on the migration from CUCM v4.1(3) to v7.1(x).<br>
<br>
I think it would be much simpler if I am able to create a SIP trunk from CallManager v7 to Connection.<br>
<br>
Has anyone seen any huge differences between an SCCP and a SIP integration? Do things generally continue to work the same?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/588a3cff/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/588a3cff/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 14<br>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:02:53 +0000<br>
From: Ryan West <<a href="mailto:rwest@zyedge.com">rwest@zyedge.com</a>><br>
To: "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IBM 7816-I4 782x-I4 Filesystem errors<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<5DC4853C6CC3EE4788779E0726E034DD60CBB2@zy-ex1.zyedge.local><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
<br>
>-----Original Message-----<br>
>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Ryan West<br>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 1:20 PM<br>
>To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IBM 7816-I4 782x-I4 Filesystem errors<br>
><br>
>Option 2a gives me an out. TAC is recommending a complete re-install if it takes several cycles for FSCK to run. If a couple of minor errors are detected and >the system looks healthy after recovery, I'll weigh my options and see if an upgrade to 8.0.3a SU1 will cover any damaged files.<br>
><br>
>-ryan<br>
<br>
Lots of file system errors were detected, SNMPD was toast, parts of JVM were corrupt and the process that runs after disc syncing also became corrupt. The file system would re-enter read-only mode after 6 hours (enough time to resync the disks). Attempted an upgrade to 8.0.3aSU1, only to have it fail near the end. My next option was to re-install, but it appears the installer does not have a way to interrupt the Out of Sync status the controllers go into after the read-only event. Sending over a blank Hardware Configuration Error screen and having TAC not understand it either did not instill great confidence with the customer or myself. Had a new server shipped out (mandated by the customer), upgraded the firmware on that 7828-I4, started the install and viola, found the same ominous Hardware Configuration Error with no information in it.<br>
<br>
All in all, I was able to recover the system to very recent copy. Even with the file system corruption, DRS was able to run without errors and the restore has been running solid for the last week. Latest bug updates are covered here:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCti52867" target="_blank">http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCti52867</a><br>
<br>
I've heard shipment was halted on these boxes, but if you've installed a CUP or CMBE server in the last 6 months, I would suggest patching ASAP. The disc exerciser takes about 45 mins to run. The firmware upgrade takes about 5 mins.<br>
<br>
-ryan<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 15<br>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:44:23 -0600<br>
From: "Duane Priebe" <<a href="mailto:dpriebe@theriverbank.com">dpriebe@theriverbank.com</a>><br>
To: <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CM 4.1(3)SR8a patch install issue<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:43D799CBE4331D44999AB7C9CD67F3020A05FBCD@NTEXCHANGE.riverbank.com">43D799CBE4331D44999AB7C9CD67F3020A05FBCD@NTEXCHANGE.riverbank.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
Hello, I've been trying to get the CM 4.1(3)SR8a patch installed<br>
(starting with the publisher). Once all AV, CSA, etc.. have been<br>
disabled I run the patch install executable. It goes forward and reads<br>
the contacts of the package, completes the file extraction process, then<br>
stalls out with a generic "Unable to open the script file" message box.<br>
In the past these SR releases have been pretty straight forward and I<br>
can't read anything on how this one might be different. Any suggestions<br>
anyone?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Duane<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/8f09cfbc/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/8f09cfbc/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 16<br>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:47:17 -0500<br>
From: "Buchanan, James" <<a href="mailto:jbuchanan@presidio.com">jbuchanan@presidio.com</a>><br>
To: Duane Priebe <<a href="mailto:dpriebe@theriverbank.com">dpriebe@theriverbank.com</a>>,<br>
"<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CM 4.1(3)SR8a patch install issue<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<853687641CF93E40B362F112A3D8F3CE10DA8A6E@SOEXCH01.Presidio.Corp><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
What are you upgrading from?<br>
<br>
James Buchanan | Technology Manager, UC | South Region | Presidio Networked Solutions<br>
12 Cadillac Dr, Suite 130, Brentwood, TN 37027 | <a href="mailto:jbuchanan@presidio.com">jbuchanan@presidio.com</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:jbuchanan@ctiusa.com">jbuchanan@ctiusa.com</a>><br>
D: 615-866-5729 | F: 615-866-5781 | <a href="http://www.presidio.com" target="_blank">www.presidio.com</a><<a href="http://www.presidio.com/" target="_blank">http://www.presidio.com/</a>><br>
CCIE #25863, Voice<br>
<br>
<br>
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Duane Priebe<br>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 8:44 AM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CM 4.1(3)SR8a patch install issue<br>
<br>
Hello, I've been trying to get the CM 4.1(3)SR8a patch installed (starting with the publisher). Once all AV, CSA, etc.. have been disabled I run the patch install executable. It goes forward and reads the contacts of the package, completes the file extraction process, then stalls out with a generic "Unable to open the script file" message box. In the past these SR releases have been pretty straight forward and I can't read anything on how this one might be different. Any suggestions anyone?<br>
<br>
Duane<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/1af60d00/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/1af60d00/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 17<br>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:51:59 -0600<br>
From: "Duane Priebe" <<a href="mailto:dpriebe@theriverbank.com">dpriebe@theriverbank.com</a>><br>
To: "Buchanan, James" <<a href="mailto:jbuchanan@presidio.com">jbuchanan@presidio.com</a>>,<br>
<<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CM 4.1(3)SR8a patch install issue<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:43D799CBE4331D44999AB7C9CD67F3020A05FBCE@NTEXCHANGE.riverbank.com">43D799CBE4331D44999AB7C9CD67F3020A05FBCE@NTEXCHANGE.riverbank.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
Upgrading from CM 4.1(3)ES103<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
From: Buchanan, James [mailto:<a href="mailto:jbuchanan@presidio.com">jbuchanan@presidio.com</a>]<br>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 8:47 AM<br>
To: Duane Priebe; <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
Subject: RE: CM 4.1(3)SR8a patch install issue<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
What are you upgrading from?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
James Buchanan | Technology Manager, UC | South Region | Presidio<br>
Networked Solutions<br>
12 Cadillac Dr, Suite 130, Brentwood, TN 37027 | <a href="mailto:jbuchanan@presidio.com">jbuchanan@presidio.com</a><br>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:jbuchanan@ctiusa.com">jbuchanan@ctiusa.com</a>><br>
D: 615-866-5729 | F: 615-866-5781 | <a href="http://www.presidio.com" target="_blank">www.presidio.com</a><br>
<<a href="http://www.presidio.com/" target="_blank">http://www.presidio.com/</a>><br>
<br>
CCIE #25863, Voice<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><br>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Duane Priebe<br>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 8:44 AM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CM 4.1(3)SR8a patch install issue<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Hello, I've been trying to get the CM 4.1(3)SR8a patch installed<br>
(starting with the publisher). Once all AV, CSA, etc.. have been<br>
disabled I run the patch install executable. It goes forward and reads<br>
the contacts of the package, completes the file extraction process, then<br>
stalls out with a generic "Unable to open the script file" message box.<br>
In the past these SR releases have been pretty straight forward and I<br>
can't read anything on how this one might be different. Any suggestions<br>
anyone?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Duane<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/501c3a31/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/501c3a31/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 18<br>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:50:33 -0500<br>
From: Ryan Ratliff <<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>><br>
To: Ryan West <<a href="mailto:rwest@zyedge.com">rwest@zyedge.com</a>><br>
Cc: "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IBM 7816-I4 782x-I4 Filesystem errors<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:9996C9B9-3F15-4402-9104-B2CFC8014E11@cisco.com">9996C9B9-3F15-4402-9104-B2CFC8014E11@cisco.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
That blank hardware config error just means the array is rebuilding. You can continue past it with no issues or go into the array controller and delete the array. The install will recreate the array for you and go on with life.<br>
<br>
The array resyncing after readonly filesystem and after the firmware upgrade are normal.<br>
<br>
-Ryan<br>
<br>
On Dec 1, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Ryan West wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
> -----Original Message-----<br>
> From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Ryan West<br>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 1:20 PM<br>
> To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IBM 7816-I4 782x-I4 Filesystem errors<br>
><br>
> Option 2a gives me an out. TAC is recommending a complete re-install if it takes several cycles for FSCK to run. If a couple of minor errors are detected and >the system looks healthy after recovery, I'll weigh my options and see if an upgrade to 8.0.3a SU1 will cover any damaged files.<br>
><br>
> -ryan<br>
<br>
Lots of file system errors were detected, SNMPD was toast, parts of JVM were corrupt and the process that runs after disc syncing also became corrupt. The file system would re-enter read-only mode after 6 hours (enough time to resync the disks). Attempted an upgrade to 8.0.3aSU1, only to have it fail near the end. My next option was to re-install, but it appears the installer does not have a way to interrupt the Out of Sync status the controllers go into after the read-only event. Sending over a blank Hardware Configuration Error screen and having TAC not understand it either did not instill great confidence with the customer or myself. Had a new server shipped out (mandated by the customer), upgraded the firmware on that 7828-I4, started the install and viola, found the same ominous Hardware Configuration Error with no information in it.<br>
<br>
All in all, I was able to recover the system to very recent copy. Even with the file system corruption, DRS was able to run without errors and the restore has been running solid for the last week. Latest bug updates are covered here:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCti52867" target="_blank">http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCti52867</a><br>
<br>
I've heard shipment was halted on these boxes, but if you've installed a CUP or CMBE server in the last 6 months, I would suggest patching ASAP. The disc exerciser takes about 45 mins to run. The firmware upgrade takes about 5 mins.<br>
<br>
-ryan<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/742b39cb/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/742b39cb/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 19<br>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:52:34 -0500<br>
From: Sandy Lee <<a href="mailto:Sandy.Lee@dti.ulaval.ca">Sandy.Lee@dti.ulaval.ca</a>><br>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>>, voyp list<br>
<<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and<br>
UCxN v7 integration<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:3C85C8DEE6E8D14D8F92A72C8B702FD40435B92BA5@EXCH-MBX-B.ulaval.ca">3C85C8DEE6E8D14D8F92A72C8B702FD40435B92BA5@EXCH-MBX-B.ulaval.ca</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
Hi Lelio,<br>
<br>
When I migrated from 4.1(3) to 7.1(3), I tried the SIP trunk, because I tought it would be simplier. I ran into a few issues and after discussing with my SE, he recommended the SCCP approach, as there are known issues with the SIP one. Nice to know ?before?. Maybe it was because I also had another SIP trunk to my legacy PBX through TIMG. Will never know, but SCCP works fine for me.<br>
<br>
Sandy.<br>
<br>
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi<br>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 4:36 PM<br>
To: voyp list<br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7 integration<br>
<br>
I'm working on the migration from CUCM v4.1(3) to v7.1(x).<br>
<br>
I think it would be much simpler if I am able to create a SIP trunk from CallManager v7 to Connection.<br>
<br>
Has anyone seen any huge differences between an SCCP and a SIP integration? Do things generally continue to work the same?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/930451d7/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/930451d7/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 20<br>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:56:41 -0500<br>
From: Ryan Ratliff <<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>><br>
To: Ki Wi <<a href="mailto:kiwi.voice@gmail.com">kiwi.voice@gmail.com</a>><br>
Cc: Cisco VoIP List <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Anyone setup 7828-I4 CUCMBE 8 before?<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:51A081FA-7BE9-41BA-9BEC-D464817B0897@cisco.com">51A081FA-7BE9-41BA-9BEC-D464817B0897@cisco.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
You should call up Cisco customer service and see if they can help you out if you ordered the wrong thing.<br>
<br>
You mentioned in your original email that you took the 8.0(3a)SU1 and made it bootable. This won't work even with the instructions from a blog out there.<br>
<br>
-Ryan<br>
<br>
On Nov 29, 2010, at 9:28 PM, Ki Wi wrote:<br>
<br>
Nope. Currently escalating to the BU. Not sure why my team manage to buy it even it's end of sales or maybe just a few days before eos<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone<br>
Pls pardon my fat fingers.<br>
<br>
On Nov 25, 2010, at 10:58 PM, Lee <<a href="mailto:ender9600@gmail.com">ender9600@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> It's not free to upgrade to a major version.<br>
><br>
> Did you order UCSS along with ESW? That would allow you to go to 8<br>
><br>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Ki Wi <<a href="mailto:kiwi.voice@gmail.com">kiwi.voice@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Which version should I be using to install it?<br>
> I tried to get the latest 8.0.3a SU1 but it can't detect the hardware and mark it as legacy (i make the disk bootable myself) .<br>
><br>
> My side somehow managed to ordered the cucmbe7 version but I wish to upgrade it to 8. I have yet to register the license, I should be able to contact licensing and get the license for cucmbe 8 right?<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br>
><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/7d688da6/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/7d688da6/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 21<br>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:00:04 +0000<br>
From: Ryan West <<a href="mailto:rwest@zyedge.com">rwest@zyedge.com</a>><br>
To: Ki Wi <<a href="mailto:kiwi.voice@gmail.com">kiwi.voice@gmail.com</a>><br>
Cc: Cisco VoIP List <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Anyone setup 7828-I4 CUCMBE 8 before?<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<5DC4853C6CC3EE4788779E0726E034DD60D147@zy-ex1.zyedge.local><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
8.0.3 is bootable, you can start from there.<br>
<br>
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff<br>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:57 AM<br>
To: Ki Wi<br>
Cc: Cisco VoIP List<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Anyone setup 7828-I4 CUCMBE 8 before?<br>
<br>
You should call up Cisco customer service and see if they can help you out if you ordered the wrong thing.<br>
<br>
You mentioned in your original email that you took the 8.0(3a)SU1 and made it bootable. This won't work even with the instructions from a blog out there.<br>
<br>
-Ryan<br>
<br>
On Nov 29, 2010, at 9:28 PM, Ki Wi wrote:<br>
<br>
Nope. Currently escalating to the BU. Not sure why my team manage to buy it even it's end of sales or maybe just a few days before eos<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone<br>
Pls pardon my fat fingers.<br>
<br>
On Nov 25, 2010, at 10:58 PM, Lee <<a href="mailto:ender9600@gmail.com">ender9600@gmail.com</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:ender9600@gmail.com">ender9600@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
It's not free to upgrade to a major version.<br>
<br>
Did you order UCSS along with ESW? That would allow you to go to 8<br>
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Ki Wi <<a href="mailto:kiwi.voice@gmail.com">kiwi.voice@gmail.com</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:kiwi.voice@gmail.com">kiwi.voice@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
Which version should I be using to install it?<br>
I tried to get the latest 8.0.3a SU1 but it can't detect the hardware and mark it as legacy (i make the disk bootable myself) .<br>
<br>
My side somehow managed to ordered the cucmbe7 version but I wish to upgrade it to 8. I have yet to register the license, I should be able to contact licensing and get the license for cucmbe 8 right?<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/68ac14bb/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/68ac14bb/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 22<br>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:03:48 -0500 (EST)<br>
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
To: Sandy Lee <<a href="mailto:Sandy.Lee@dti.ulaval.ca">Sandy.Lee@dti.ulaval.ca</a>><br>
Cc: voyp list <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and<br>
UCxN v7 integration<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:1628803545.750680.1291219428783.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca">1628803545.750680.1291219428783.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
Thanks Sandy. I think I will try the SIP trunk, but you are right, I will most likely be sticking with an SCCP integration for now. Tried and true.<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
From: "Sandy Lee" <<a href="mailto:Sandy.Lee@dti.ulaval.ca">Sandy.Lee@dti.ulaval.ca</a>><br>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>>, "voyp list" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2010 10:52:34 AM<br>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7 integration<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Hi Lelio,<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
When I migrated from 4.1(3) to 7.1(3), I tried the SIP trunk, because I tought it would be simplier. I ran into a few issues and after discussing with my SE, he recommended the SCCP approach, as there are known issues with the SIP one. Nice to know ?before?. Maybe it was because I also had another SIP trunk to my legacy PBX through TIMG. Will never know, but SCCP works fine for me.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Sandy.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi<br>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 4:36 PM<br>
To: voyp list<br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7 integration<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
I'm working on the migration from CUCM v4.1(3) to v7.1(x).<br>
<br>
I think it would be much simpler if I am able to create a SIP trunk from CallManager v7 to Connection.<br>
<br>
Has anyone seen any huge differences between an SCCP and a SIP integration? Do things generally continue to work the same?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/468786ae/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/468786ae/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 23<br>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:06:54 -0500<br>
From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>><br>
To: Sandy Lee <<a href="mailto:Sandy.Lee@dti.ulaval.ca">Sandy.Lee@dti.ulaval.ca</a>>, Lelio Fulgenzi<br>
<<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>>, voyp list <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and<br>
UCxN v7 integration<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<4E38DB0A1959B04C8C83EDCF069B53ED0C81F59F0B@USISPCLEXDB01.na.didata.local><br>
<br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
I?d like to know what the ?known SIP issues? are ? In general I still stick with SCCP out of habit but I?d like to have known what was on his/her mind.<br>
<br>
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Sandy Lee<br>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:53 AM<br>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi; voyp list<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7 integration<br>
<br>
Hi Lelio,<br>
<br>
When I migrated from 4.1(3) to 7.1(3), I tried the SIP trunk, because I tought it would be simplier. I ran into a few issues and after discussing with my SE, he recommended the SCCP approach, as there are known issues with the SIP one. Nice to know ?before?. Maybe it was because I also had another SIP trunk to my legacy PBX through TIMG. Will never know, but SCCP works fine for me.<br>
<br>
Sandy.<br>
<br>
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi<br>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 4:36 PM<br>
To: voyp list<br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7 integration<br>
<br>
I'm working on the migration from CUCM v4.1(3) to v7.1(x).<br>
<br>
I think it would be much simpler if I am able to create a SIP trunk from CallManager v7 to Connection.<br>
<br>
Has anyone seen any huge differences between an SCCP and a SIP integration? Do things generally continue to work the same?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
<br>
-----------------------------------------<br>
Disclaimer:<br>
<br>
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain<br>
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the<br>
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the<br>
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received<br>
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of<br>
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be<br>
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please<br>
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it<br>
from your computer. Thank you.<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/8a39d15f/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/8a39d15f/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 24<br>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:10:35 -0500 (EST)<br>
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
To: "Jason Aarons (US)" <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>><br>
Cc: voyp list <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and<br>
UCxN v7 integration<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:1260310073.751122.1291219835303.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca">1260310073.751122.1291219835303.JavaMail.root@simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
what I read in different spots was DTMF and compatibility with old SCCP phones which would likely need an MTP.<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>><br>
To: "Sandy Lee" <<a href="mailto:Sandy.Lee@dti.ulaval.ca">Sandy.Lee@dti.ulaval.ca</a>>, "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>>, "voyp list" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2010 11:06:54 AM<br>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7 integration<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
I?d like to know what the ?known SIP issues? are ? In general I still stick with SCCP out of habit but I?d like to have known what was on his/her mind.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Sandy Lee<br>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:53 AM<br>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi; voyp list<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7 integration<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Hi Lelio,<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
When I migrated from 4.1(3) to 7.1(3), I tried the SIP trunk, because I tought it would be simplier. I ran into a few issues and after discussing with my SE, he recommended the SCCP approach, as there are known issues with the SIP one. Nice to know ?before?. Maybe it was because I also had another SIP trunk to my legacy PBX through TIMG. Will never know, but SCCP works fine for me.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Sandy.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi<br>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 4:36 PM<br>
To: voyp list<br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7 integration<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
I'm working on the migration from CUCM v4.1(3) to v7.1(x).<br>
<br>
I think it would be much simpler if I am able to create a SIP trunk from CallManager v7 to Connection.<br>
<br>
Has anyone seen any huge differences between an SCCP and a SIP integration? Do things generally continue to work the same?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.<br>
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/8822eb7f/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101201/8822eb7f/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>
<br>
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 86, Issue 1<br>
*****************************************<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>