<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
with SIP, you may get more capacity of the channel. But in our case, we have to setup IPSEC VPN with Verizon to utilize their SIP Trunk. Network has to be reliable.<BR>
<BR>
David<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR> <BR>
> From: matthew@ciscovoiceguru.com<BR>> Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 13:43:34 -0600<BR>> To: notariannil1@scranton.edu<BR>> CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Verizon SIP vs. PRI?<BR>> <BR>> One of my biggest questions right now regarding SIP trunks has been data circuit issues and usability in SRST mode. If your branch office loses it's network connection, will your SIP trunk go down too? If so, then you're up the creek without a paddle.<BR>> <BR>> Sent from my iPhone<BR>> <BR>> On Feb 8, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Lisa Notarianni <notariannil1@scranton.edu> wrote:<BR>> <BR>> > We currently utilize PRI trunks as fail over and backup. They connect to our 6509's.<BR>> > <BR>> > Can anyone share their thoughts on SIP vs. PRI services. <BR>> > <BR>> > Thanks,<BR>> > <BR>> > Lisa<BR>> > -- <BR>> > <LNsignature.jpg><BR>> > _______________________________________________<BR>> > cisco-voip mailing list<BR>> > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<BR>> <BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> cisco-voip mailing list<BR>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<BR> </body>
</html>