<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Have you looked at CUCI-Lync?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Dennis Heim<br>Network Voice Engineer<br>CDW Advanced Technology Services<br>11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225<br>Carmel, IN 46032<br><br>317.569.4255 Single Number Reach</span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><br>317.569.4201 Fax</span><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'> <br><a href="mailto:dennis.heim@cdw.com"><span style='font-size:10.0pt;color:blue'>dennis.heim@cdw.com</span></a></span><u><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:blue'><br></span></u><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><a href="http://www.cdw.com/content/solutions/unified-communications/"><span style='color:blue'>cdw.com/content/solutions/unified-communications/</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Tony Edwards<br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, February 17, 2011 6:45 AM<br><b>To:</b> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br><b>Subject:</b> [cisco-voip] cisco and ms lync uc<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>hi all,<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>i am wondering whether any one here already implemented the following 2 cisco and ms un integrations scenarios ? if yes , can you please extend possible guidance ?<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>scenario 1<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>========<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>topology is as follows<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>sccp cisco phones -----> ccm7.x cluster -------> sip trunk ------> ms lync -----> ms im client on pc <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>objectives are as follows<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>we have 2 x independent uc cluster of cisco , where all 500 + ip phones lives , while on the other hand , ms lync server services 500 + im users in totally separate way.now , i am planning to integrate these 2 x vendor uc clusters in order to provide a "true inter vendor uc" collaborative experience to my clients.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>that way , we can offer following services to the clients.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>keep the ccm cluster as a sole & central ip pbx in this topology and it works as gateway or default gateway to lync server and i do not want to turn on full blown call routing functionality on lync at all.however , i am aiming to provide all my im users more than just chat, such as "click to call" from any ms apps such as http pages , ms office docs ..etc , click to dial by dialing any contact number from im gui , so that im will control the desk phone at the user desk , audio and desktop video , conferencing and softphone functionality from im gui itself. however , all the call routing will be processed via ccm cluster and not via lync server.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>can this be achievable ?<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>scenario 2<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>==========<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>2nd topology i am looking at is as follows<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>sccp cisco phones -----> ccm7.x cluster -------> sip trunk ------> ms lync -----> cisco cuci lync client on pc ( just like cuci moc client) -------> registered with ccm as sccp endpoint.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>as cuci lync client is jointly produced by both cisco and ms and also as cisco cuci lync got a familiar cisco soft phone kind of functionality , besides , it can be configured on ccm as sccp end point , i am considering this scenario too. but the biggest issue for me with this scenario 2 is that , it may costs me a lot $$ on cuci lync client software licensing , since i do not have cisoc enterprise licencing. apart from that , can this be achievable ?<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>in this scenario too, i would like to keep call processing and call routing intelligence with ccm cluster and not with lync at all.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>scenario 3<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>========<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>installing cups with in cisco uc cluster and get the cup-c client to do all ms lync im does. but for that , i need to convince my smb business clients to spend more money $$$ , which they can not do it right now ( but perhaps in future certainly), since they have already invested on ms exchange and lync uc fleet. so , this option may not fly with my clients.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>thanks a lot for your help in this matter.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>tony<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></body></html>