<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>We've added a few sip devices lately and the only changes were acl's for the control traffic (that i have found)<br><br>Sent from my iPad</div><div><br>On Mar 17, 2011, at 2:47 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000">Just wondering if anyone has used the Cisco 187 SIP protocol ATA. We have an ATA 186 out in the field (might even be a 188) that worries me for a few reasons. We don't have a spare and if I screw up the firmware update they won't have service.<br><br>I'm thinking of replacing it with a 187 but I've never had a SIP device on our voice network. I'm guessing it uses different ports for talking so some changes to the ACLs are necessary.<br><br>Anything else?<br><br>Lelio<br><br><span><br><span name="x"></span>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. <br> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br><span name="x"></span><br></span><br></div></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>cisco-voip mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a></span><br><span><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>