Sorry, meant to follow that up immediately noting the date today but ended up having to make a several hour drive (No foolin'). I have the same complaints; Happy April 1st...<div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Ovidiu Popa <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ovi.popa@gmail.com">ovi.popa@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

  
    
  
  <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
    Will definitely try it. Couple of questions:<br>
    - directories are not identical. Why doesn't it let me install it
    and let me be?<br>
    - is using RTMT from a 8.0 to connect to 8.5 supported ?<br>
    <br>
    CUCM 8.0.3a Release Note = October 19, 2010 (44,273,141 bytes)<br>
    CUPS 8.5.1 Release Note = February 16, 2011 (44,603,780 bytes)<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    How come two products with different versions and different file
    sizes for the same application use the same internal version?<br><font color="#888888">
    <br>
    Ovidiu</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
    <br>
    On 01/Apr/11 9:08 PM, Ryan Ratliff wrote:
    <blockquote type="cite">So that is multiple installations of the same version
      of RTMT, just from different products.
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>If you use the CUCM RTMT and login to the CUPS server does it
        show CUPS data?</div>
      <div><br>
        <div>
          <span style="border-collapse:separate;color:rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family:Helvetica;font-size:medium;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
            <div>-Ryan</div>
          </span>
        </div>
        <br>
        <div>
          <div>On Apr 1, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Ovidiu Popa wrote:</div>
          <br>
          <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> Hello Ryan<br>
            <br>
            Here are the "rumor" details:<br>
            RTMT from CUCM 8.0.3.20000-2 installed on my machine on
            C:\Program Files\Cisco\Unified Communications Manager
            Serviceability<br>
            RTMT from CUPS  8.5.1.10000-35 to be installed at C:\Program
            Files\Cisco\Presence Serviceability\JRtmt<br>
            <br>
            I think the warning message is pretty self-explanatory:<br>
            <br>
            "<br>
            Warning: You have a RTMT of version 8.5.0.0 already
            installed. You are not allowed to install more than one copy
            of RTMT of same version on the same machine <br>
            ...<br>
            Warning: Existing RTMT version 8.5.0.0 will be uninstalled
            if the current installation is continued.<br>
            "<br>
            <br>
            Attched the screenshots.<br>
            <br>
            Regards,<br>
            Ovidiu<br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            On 01/Apr/11 7:54 PM, Ryan Ratliff wrote:
            <blockquote type="cite">I'd love to see where that rumor got started.
               I have no less than 4 versions of RTMT installed on my PC
              right now.  I'm pretty sure the introduction of the RTMT
              version into the program has alleviated the multiple
              install issues.  Of course having 3 different program
              groups under Programs->Cisco for various incarnations
              is fun too.
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>In general I use the latest and assume it's backwards
                compatible, at least for what I need it for (pulling
                traces).  Some of the advanced features may not be
                reliable with older versions and you should never expect
                an older RTMT to work with newer CUCM.</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>As for one RTMT for various products I'm thinking the
                move to Unified Serviceability with RTMT 8.7 and 8.8 is
                a signal that there is a desire for that to work.
                 Whether it does or not I've not tested.</div>
              <div><br>
                <div> <span style="border-collapse:separate;font-family:Helvetica;font-size:medium;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
                    <div>-Ryan</div>
                  </span> </div>
                <br>
                <div>
                  <div>On Apr 1, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Mac GroupStudy
                    wrote:</div>
                  <br>
                  Rumor has it Cisco TAC uses ONE version of RTMT for
                  access to all of our versions of CUCM. Why can't we
                  have that.<br>
                  <br>
                  <div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:31
                    AM, Garrett Skjelstad <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:garrett@skjelstad.org" target="_blank">garrett@skjelstad.org</a>></span>
                    wrote:<br>
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex">I think I'd prefer
                      versions to be backwards compatible and simply a
                      drop down box allowing me to choose which version
                      I was going to be operating against. This would
                      allow the UI to be fresh with whatever the latest
                      version is, but allow backwards compatibility
                      against previous revisions of software.<br>
                      <br>
                      Sent from my iPhone<br>
                      <div>
                        <div><br>
                          On Mar 31, 2011, at 22:38, Paul <<a href="mailto:asobihoudai@yahoo.com" target="_blank">asobihoudai@yahoo.com</a>>

                          wrote:<br>
                          <br>
                          > I'd normally agree but seeing how RTMT
                          must be changed according to each<br>
                          > modification to the application, I think
                          it's not completely unreasonable to<br>
                          > upgrade/downgrade RTMT for the sake of
                          strict compatibility...plus it doesn't<br>
                          > even require a reboot!<br>
                          ><br>
                          > Think of cases where a piece of software
                          maintains backwards compatibility for<br>
                          > the long haul...that's where you get
                          software like MS Windows where cruft is<br>
                          > built upon cruft upon cruft...you get the
                          picture. I think I'd rather have RTMT<br>
                          > not require 1GB+ memory/HDD just for the
                          sake of having one version to work with<br>
                          > all versions.<br>
                          ><br>
                          ><br>
                          ><br>
                          > ----- Original Message ----<br>
                          > From: Jason Aarons (US) <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com" target="_blank">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>><br>
                          > To: Ovidiu Popa <<a href="mailto:ovi.popa@gmail.com" target="_blank">ovi.popa@gmail.com</a>>;

                          "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>"<br>
                          > <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
                          > Sent: Thu, March 31, 2011 6:47:30 PM<br>
                          > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] RTMT versions
                          and product compatibility<br>
                          ><br>
                          ><br>
                          > At RTMT  install change the folder name
                          to something else c:\program<br>
                          > files\rtmtv8 vs c:\program files\rtmtv85<br>
                          ><br>
                          > Surely this complaint must be at some
                          Product Manager within Cisco working hard<br>
                          > to get a resolution.  It's truly a
                          headache and a mystery as deep as  "Where is<br>
                          > Jimmy Hoffa?" and "Who really shot JFK?"<br>
                          ><br>
                          > I vote for 1 version of RTMT. Anyone want
                          to second that motion?<br>
                          ><br>
                          > -----Original Message-----<br>
                          > From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><br>
                          > [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>]
                          On Behalf Of Ovidiu Popa<br>
                          > Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 5:34 PM<br>
                          > To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
                          > Subject: [cisco-voip] RTMT versions and
                          product compatibility<br>
                          ><br>
                          > Hello everyone<br>
                          ><br>
                          > I have a couple of questions related to
                          RTMT:<br>
                          ><br>
                          > - what is the relationship between RTMT
                          versions and software product versions<br>
                          > (CUCM, CUPS etc): Can we use a newer
                          version of RTMT to connect to older<br>
                          > versions of software e.g. using RTMT from
                          CUCM 8 to connect to CUCM version 7?<br>
                          ><br>
                          > - can we use a CUPS RTMT to connect to
                          CUCM or the other way around?<br>
                          ><br>
                          > - Why the different versions of RTMT
                          don't play nice i.e if they detect another<br>
                          > version will not let you install the new
                          version until you get rid of the old<br>
                          > one? Has anyone found a solution to
                          install multiple RTMT from different<br>
                          > products on the same workstation?<br>
                          ><br>
                          > By default RTMT uses different
                          directories but even with different
                          directories<br>
                          > they will not let you install multiple
                          versions:<br>
                          > C:\Program Files\Cisco\Unified
                          Communications Manager Serviceability\
                          C:\Program<br>
                          > Files\Cisco\Presence Serviceability\JRtmt<br>
                          ><br>
                          > Thanks<br>
                          > Ovidiu<br>
                          >
                          _______________________________________________<br>
                          > cisco-voip mailing list<br>
                          > <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
                          > <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
                          > -----------------------------------------<br>
                          > Disclaimer:<br>
                          ><br>
                          > This e-mail communication and any
                          attachments may contain<br>
                          > confidential and privileged information
                          and is for use by the<br>
                          > designated addressee(s) named above only.
                           If you are not the<br>
                          > intended addressee, you are hereby
                          notified that you have received<br>
                          > this communication in error and that any
                          use or reproduction of<br>
                          > this email or its contents is strictly
                          prohibited and may be<br>
                          > unlawful.  If you have received this
                          communication in error, please<br>
                          > notify us immediately by replying to this
                          message and deleting it<br>
                          > from your computer. Thank you.<br>
                          ><br>
                          >
                          _______________________________________________<br>
                          > cisco-voip mailing list<br>
                          > <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
                          > <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
                          ><br>
                          >
                          _______________________________________________<br>
                          > cisco-voip mailing list<br>
                          > <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
                          > <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
                          <br>
_______________________________________________<br>
                          cisco-voip mailing list<br>
                          <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
                          <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                  <br>
                  _______________________________________________<br>
                  cisco-voip mailing list<br>
                  <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
                  <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
                </div>
                <br>
              </div>
              <pre><fieldset></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
</pre>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
          </div>
          <span><01 Setup.zip></span>_______________________________________________<br>
          cisco-voip mailing list<br>
          <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
          <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </div></div></div>

<br>_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>