<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252"></head><body style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div><div>I've always created a single CTI Route Point for all of the installations that I do where *XXXX is added for direct transfer to voicemail. When additional voicemail only DNs are necessary I will create a translation pattern for the DN that transforms the number to *<DN>. Translation patterns are easy to maintain, have a good description and can be imported easily if a large amount of them need to be put in place.</div><div><div><div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium; "><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#1F497D" size="6"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px;"><b><br></b></span></font></p></div></div></div></div></div><div><br></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt"><span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span> "Jason Aarons (AM)" <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span> Tue, 5 Apr 2011 21:12:55 -0400<br><span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span> "cisco-voip (<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>)" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span> [cisco-voip] Better way than CTI Route Point for a voicemail only in CallManager 8x<br></div><div><br></div><div xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div class="WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal">I have some Unity Connection 8.5 “informational mailboxes” that will be used with UCCE. Just a recording the queue is busy and leave a message. <o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">It seems like for users that don’t have phones, just a voice mailbox, there should be a Device > Voicemail , rather than cheating around the DLU issues (back in that day I would make a phone that just has the phone number as the mac address and sent direct to vm but that trick now uses costly DLUs) It seams I’m back to creating a CTI Route Points for these mailboxes, which work,s but just seems odd when you explain it to a customer. <o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">It’s like telling someone to use bungee cords to shut your car trunk, it works - but kind of odd. Eventually you think the car manufacturer would have a model with a latch for the trunk, but 5 years later all the new models don’t have the latch and your explaining the bungee cord can come in colors </rant><o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">Should I bother with having the customer submit a CallManager feature request for this? Seems my call forwarding from secondary lines request in 2001 didn’t make it too far <grin>…<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div><div><div><p></p><hr size="1"><p></p><a href="http://dimensiondata.stream57.com/04141pm/"><span style="color:blue;text-decoration:none"><img border="0" src="http://image.exct.net/lib/feed16797d620d/i/2/8c665b10-9.gif" alt="DDIPT"></span></a><p><strong>
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
</strong></p></div></div></span></body></html>