<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
    Daniel,<br>
    <br>
    Thanks for clarifying that.<br>
    <br>
    A bit of disclaimer: participation in this mailer comes with no
    warranty, validation, our guarantee.  This is helping out in a
    community. For formal design guidance contact your Cisco account
    team.<br>
    <br>
    TFTP and IPVMS in general will consume less resources.  TFTP mostly
    requires memory and CPU for building and caching files in memory.
    IPVMS mostly requires CPU for originating and mixing audio streams.<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    Otherwise to your question:<br>
    What would be the recommended architecture for subscribers?<br>
    - Currently looking at having 3 x 7845 for Subs for about 7500
    phones including Softphones<br>
    <br>
    Option#1<br>
    - 2 CCM Groups to have all phones split 50-50<br>
                    CUCM Group1                  CUCM Group2<br>
                    Sub A                                    Sub B<br>
                    Sub B                                     Sub A<br>
                    Sub C                                     Sub C<br>
    <br>
    Option#2<br>
    - 2 CCM Groups to have all phones split 50-50<br>
                    CUCM Group1                  CUCM Group2<br>
                    Sub A                                    Sub B<br>
                    Sub C                                     Sub C<br>
                    Sub B                                     Sub A<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    In Option #1 if SubA goes down then SubB is hosting all of Group2
    and concurrently attempting to register all phones from Group1. That
    could be a bottle neck. It could cause Group2 to affect service for
    Group1.  This risk arises with only 1 failure (either SubA or SubB
    fails).<br>
    <br>
    In Option#2 if SubA and SubB fail then SubC has to register all
    phones. This risk arises with 2 failures (SubA fails AND SubB
    fails).<br>
    <br>
    Regards,<br>
    Wes<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    On 5/10/2011 10:41 PM, Daniel wrote:
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:BANLkTimPL8QDVXVDdfh7fOyZ=Tt0fFuT-Q@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite"><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif">The
          publisher is not running any call processing.</font></font>
      <div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif"><br>
          </font></font></div>
      <div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif">I was asking
            for opinions on sizing the last two TFTP and IPVMS servers
            with less resources.</font></font></div>
      <div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif"><br>
          </font></font></div>
      <div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif"><br>
          </font></font><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Wes
          Sisk <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:wsisk@cisco.com">wsisk@cisco.com</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
            0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
            padding-left: 1ex;">
            <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> With more than 3
              nodes in the cluster the publisher generally should not
              run call processing. It should be a dedicated publisher.<br>
              <br>
              Regards,<br>
              Wes
              <div>
                <div class="h5"><br>
                  <br>
                  On 5/10/2011 5:48 PM, Daniel wrote: </div>
              </div>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <div>
                  <div class="h5"><font size="2"><font
                        face="verdana,sans-serif">Hi Guys,</font></font>
                    <div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif"><br>
                        </font></font></div>
                    <div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif">I'm
                          setting up a new cluster that has 7 nodes,
                          publisher, 4 subscribers, and 2 dedicated
                          servers with each running TFTP and IPVMS.</font></font></div>
                    <div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif"><br>
                        </font></font></div>
                    <div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif">This
                          is all UC on UCS. The publisher and
                          subscirbers have been setup with the 7500 user
                          OVA/F file. I would like to get peoples
                          thoughts on setting the last two servers that
                          are each running TFTP and IPVMS only (no call
                          processing) to be setup with the 2500 user
                          OVA/F file?</font></font></div>
                    <div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif"><br>
                        </font></font></div>
                    <div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif">It
                          will use less space from our SAN etc.. does it
                          need to be the same size since they're not
                          doing call processing?</font></font></div>
                    <div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif"><br>
                        </font></font></div>
                    <div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif">cheers,</font></font></div>
                    <div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif"><br>
                        </font></font></div>
                    <div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif">Dan</font></font></div>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <pre><fieldset></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
</pre>
              </blockquote>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>