So this is my limited understanding of RSVP and maybe for what I'm planning now, it's not the best way to do it.<div><br></div><div>RSVP is really for times of different link speeds or not Hub and spoke. eg. Hub -- 10mb -- remote site 1 -- T1 -- remote site 2. RSVP would allow CAC for the users at Remote site 2 to have correct CAC while still providing CAC for Remote Site 1.</div>
<div><br></div><div>So where my my original thought came from was a hub ======= remote site. One line would be our main 200 mb connection and the other would be a MPLS backup 5mb link. I believe this would also be a good choice to use RSVP.</div>
<div><br></div><div>But we are now looking at the secondary link as possibly a backup internet connection using getvpn to link back in. Now since it's the internet...... maybe RSVP goes out the window...... and so does any QoS. </div>
<div><br></div><div>If I'm misunderstanding.... can someone edumacate me? a good schooling will help me now, before I get to far down a dead end network ;-)</div><div><br></div><div>Scott<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Wellnitz, Erick A. <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:erick.wellnitz@kattenlaw.com">erick.wellnitz@kattenlaw.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">That’s kind of what I would like to know. Is it worth the trouble of configuring RSVP? Advantages? Disadvantages?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">What would be the use case for implementing it?
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">In our situation, calls must complete and be of good quality. I need to be able to steer management (which already has determined they want RSVP) to the correct
solution for our needs.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt"> Jason Aarons (AM) [mailto:<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com" target="_blank">jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, June 24, 2011 10:36 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Wellnitz, Erick A.; Scott Voll; <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [cisco-voip] Redundancy -- Quality of Voice -- QoS vs RSVP<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">So if the bandwidth isn’t available to be reserved will you display a out of bandwidth message on phone and have them wait? Or AAR? Just trying to understand
what happens without it and how adding it will make things better. Will the MKQ score be better for existing calls, not allowing new calls that overwhelm the link?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt"> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Wellnitz, Erick A.<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, June 24, 2011 11:03 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Scott Voll; <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] Redundancy -- Quality of Voice -- QoS vs RSVP<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">Great question. We have a similar topology to Scott’s and once we have all of our offices converted to Cisco VoIP we will be looking at RSVP to maintain quality.
We attempted it before on 6.1.2 but we never got it working.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt"> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Scott Voll<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, June 24, 2011 9:43 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [cisco-voip] Redundancy -- Quality of Voice -- QoS vs RSVP<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">OK, so I'm feeling a little behind the ball. I've always had a hub and spoke network, but now we are looking at redundant networks to keep up time to the 5 9's or better.<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I'm looking at using our internet connections via VPN to backup your current MANs.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">eg. remote site -- MAN -- Hub<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> | ---- Internet VPN ----|<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">beyond the Routing / VPN it sounds like I should be using RSVP rather than CAC and QoS. Has anyone setup RSVP? I'm currently on CM 7.1 but If I'm thinking correctly, I need 8.5 or 8.6 to get RSVP working with CM.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">What other things am I forgetting?<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">What have others found with RSVP? Good, bad, or other.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">TIA<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Scott<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<span style="color:white">itevomcid</span> <u></u><u></u></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="background:white;padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt">
<pre><span style="color:black">===========================================================<u></u><u></u></span></pre>
<pre><span style="color:black">CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Regulations Governing Practice Before the Internal Revenue<u></u><u></u></span></pre>
<pre><span style="color:black">Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used<u></u><u></u></span></pre>
<pre><span style="color:black">by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.<u></u><u></u></span></pre>
<pre><span style="color:black">===========================================================<u></u><u></u></span></pre>
<pre><span style="color:black">CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:<u></u><u></u></span></pre>
<pre><span style="color:black">This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive<u></u><u></u></span></pre>
<pre><span style="color:black">use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is<u></u><u></u></span></pre>
<pre><span style="color:black">proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you<u></u><u></u></span></pre>
<pre><span style="color:black">are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or <u></u><u></u></span></pre>
<pre><span style="color:black">distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify<u></u><u></u></span></pre>
<pre><span style="color:black">the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original <u></u><u></u></span></pre>
<pre><span style="color:black">message without making any copies.<u></u><u></u></span></pre>
<pre><span style="color:black">===========================================================<u></u><u></u></span></pre>
<pre><span style="color:black">NOTIFICATION: Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability partnership that has<u></u><u></u></span></pre>
<pre><span style="color:black">elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997).<u></u><u></u></span></pre>
<pre><span style="color:black">===========================================================<u></u><u></u></span></pre>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div></div></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>