<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000066" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<font size="-1"><font face="Trebuchet MS">Hi, <br>
i am back to this.<br>
It didn't work also!<br>
I simplified the config with h323 config but still, faxes could
not be received!<br>
I noticed that the UC was up for 30 weeks so i reloaded it.<br>
Ever since then, no problem exists on receiving faxes!!<br>
uc is running:flash:uc500-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.SB<br>
is this known bug?<br>
What could have caused it?<br>
</font></font><br>
On 5/7/2011 22:42, Anthony Kouloglou wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4E136937.4070407@dataways.gr" type="cite">Thanks
Nick,
<br>
i have already configured a dial-peer pots with no stcapp and also
inserted no vad in the config.
<br>
I will wait to see how it goes.
<br>
<br>
On 5/7/2011 9:23 μμ, Nick Matthews wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">If you remove the SCCP app from the pots
dial peers you will simplify
<br>
the faxing.
<br>
<br>
Right now since SCCP (or MGCP) is controlling the port the
system is
<br>
forcing a DSP into the call.
<br>
<br>
If you use basic H.323 control and the call is going out another
TDM
<br>
port on the UC540 it will do a 'DSP bypass' and skip the PVDM
<br>
processing. This is basically equivalent to plugging the fax
machine
<br>
into the TDM port and there is no fax over IP happening at all
<br>
(ideal).
<br>
<br>
It's very possible you've got new slips on your PRI or the
carrier
<br>
network has started getting slips.
<br>
<br>
-nick
<br>
<br>
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Anthony
Kouloglou<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:akoul@dataways.gr"><akoul@dataways.gr></a> wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Hi all,
<br>
i have a UC540 running CME 7.1 for a year.
<br>
All fxs ports are configured with stcapp thus they are
registered as SCCP
<br>
devices.
<br>
Suddenly, one year later with no problems so far, faxes are
coming corrupted
<br>
or not at all while in the same moment, the same fax machine
can send faxes
<br>
with no problem!
<br>
Is there something i can look in the config?
<br>
The guy who supports the fax machine says that there is no
problme with the
<br>
device.
<br>
Any help will be much appreciated.
<br>
<br>
BTW: UC50 uptime is 22 weeks.
<br>
<br>
<br>
Best Regards
<br>
Anthony
<br>
_______________________________________________
<br>
cisco-voip mailing list
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
_______________________________________________
<br>
cisco-voip mailing list
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>