<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>But Scott said it matches the @ based route pattern first, not the ! based route pattern.<br><br>From what I read in your response, you're saying it should match the ! based route pattern?<br><span><br>I agree that it has something to do with the macro and how it expands only possible values, so, let's say area codes that only begin with 2-9, not 0-9. it must create a smaller number of international patterns, i.e. only country codes that are valid.<br><br><span name="x"></span><br></span><br><hr id="zwchr"><b>From: </b>"Wes Sisk" <wsisk@cisco.com><br><b>To: </b>"Scott Voll" <svoll.voip@gmail.com><br><b>Cc: </b>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br><b>Sent: </b>Wednesday, October 26, 2011 4:12:08 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [cisco-voip] Best match?????<br><br>@ is not a "pattern". It is a "macro" that expands out to many patterns.<br><br>9.011! with the supplied number of digits is a 'closer match' than the international pattern added by the 9.@ macro.<br><br>/Wes<br><br>On Oct 26, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Scott Voll wrote:<br><br>I have a CSS Lets call unresticted.<br><br>inside unrestricted I have two partitions, lets call US and International.<br><br>inside US I have a 9.@ route<br><br>and inside International I have a 9.011!<br><br>The CSS list International first.<br><br>What does a number such as 9011 52 123 1234567 not match the international but rather the US 9.@? wouldn't 9.011! be a better match?<br><br>Thanks<br><br>Scott<br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br></div></body></html>