<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>My guess is because there are no country codes that start with 1 (just googled), the @ macro reduces the number of possible matches by at least two if not three digits, i.e. 1X or 1XX that the ! marker would give.<span><br><br><span name="x"></span>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. <br> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br><span name="x"></span><br></span><br><hr id="zwchr"><b>From: </b>"Scott Voll" <svoll.voip@gmail.com><br><b>To: </b>"Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio@uoguelph.ca><br><b>Cc: </b>"Wes Sisk" <wsisk@cisco.com>, cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br><b>Sent: </b>Wednesday, October 26, 2011 4:54:57 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [cisco-voip] Best match?????<br><br>Correct.... that's why I'm scratching my head....<div><br></div><div>Scott<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca" target="_blank">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">But Scott said it matches the @ based route pattern first, not the ! based route pattern.<br>
<br>From what I read in your response, you're saying it should match the ! based route pattern?<br><span><br>I agree that it has something to do with the macro and how it expands only possible values, so, let's say area codes that only begin with 2-9, not 0-9. it must create a smaller number of international patterns, i.e. only country codes that are valid.<br>
<br><span></span><br></span><br><hr><b>From: </b>"Wes Sisk" <<a href="mailto:wsisk@cisco.com" target="_blank">wsisk@cisco.com</a>><br><b>To: </b>"Scott Voll" <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com" target="_blank">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc: </b><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><b>Sent: </b>Wednesday, October 26, 2011 4:12:08 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [cisco-voip] Best match?????<div><div></div>
<div class="h5"><br><br>@ is not a "pattern". It is a "macro" that expands out to many patterns.<br><br>9.011! with the supplied number of digits is a 'closer match' than the international pattern added by the 9.@ macro.<br>
<br>/Wes<br><br>On Oct 26, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Scott Voll wrote:<br><br>I have a CSS Lets call unresticted.<br><br>inside unrestricted I have two partitions, lets call US and International.<br><br>inside US I have a 9.@ route<br>
<br>and inside International I have a 9.011!<br><br>The CSS list International first.<br><br>What does a number such as 9011 52 123 1234567 not match the international but rather the US 9.@? wouldn't 9.011! be a better match?<br>
<br>Thanks<br><br>Scott<br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
</div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></body></html>