<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>I'm not sure how much value there is, but since our telephone service provider confirmed that 10-10 dialing is available on our service, each of my off-net route patterns includes "TRANSIT-NETWORK-ESCAPE DOES-NOT-EXIST".<br><br>This will prevent anyone inadvertently using a 10-10 long distance service provider which would appear on our bill and be difficult to track/bill back.<br><br><br><span><br><span name="x"></span>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. <br> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br><span name="x"></span><br></span><br><hr id="zwchr"><b>From: </b>"Erick" <ewellnitzvoip@gmail.com><br><b>To: </b>"Wes Sisk" <wsisk@cisco.com><br><b>Cc: </b>"cisco-voip" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br><b>Sent: </b>Tuesday, November 15, 2011 9:16:48 AM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [cisco-voip] nanp routing sanity check<br><br>Thanks Wes. <br><br>We probably aren't going to make a change but it's best to be prepared.<br><br>On Nov 15, 2011, at 8:01 AM, Wes Sisk <wsisk@cisco.com> wrote:<br><br>> From the NANP file LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL is:<br>> <br>> # 1+01XXXX+1+[2-9][02-9]XXXXX<br>> P: 101 TRANSIT-NETWORK-ESCAPE<br>> P: XXXX TRANSIT-NETWORK<br>> P: 1 LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL<br>> P: [2-9][02-9]X OFFICE-CODE<br>> P: XXXX SUBSCRIBER<br>> T: N<br>> <br>> # 1+01XXXX+1+[2-9]X[02-9]XXXX<br>> P: 101 TRANSIT-NETWORK-ESCAPE<br>> P: XXXX TRANSIT-NETWORK<br>> P: 1 LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL<br>> P: [2-9]X[02-9] OFFICE-CODE<br>> P: XXXX SUBSCRIBER<br>> T: N<br>> <br>> # 1+[2-9]11<br>> P: 1 LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL<br>> P: [2-9]11 SERVICE<br>> T: N<br>> U: Y<br>> <br>> # 1+[2-9][02-9]XXXXX<br>> P: 1 LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL<br>> P: [2-9][02-9]X OFFICE-CODE<br>> P: XXXX SUBSCRIBER<br>> T: N<br>> <br>> # 1+[2-9]X[02-9]XXXX<br>> P: 1 LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL<br>> P: [2-9]X[02-9] OFFICE-CODE<br>> P: XXXX SUBSCRIBER<br>> T: N<br>> <br>> Regards,<br>> Wes<br>> <br>> <br>> On Nov 14, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Erick Wellnitz wrote:<br>> <br>> I have need to implement a change to our routing...even though it works as designed.<br>> <br>> Route filter to catch 7 digit numbers:<br>> (AREA-CODE DOES-NOT-EXIST AND COUNTRY-CODE DOES-NOT-EXIST AND LOCAL-AREA-CODE DOES-NOT-EXIST AND LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL DOES-NOT-EXIST)<br>> <br>> I'm not sure about the "LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL DOES-NOT-EXIST" part. I would think that 7 digit IS local direct dial. Am I off base here?<br>> <br>> Erick<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> <br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br></div></body></html>