<p>Got a bug id on that? We use ldap here. </p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Nov 22, 2011 4:13 PM, "Eric Butcher" <<a href="mailto:Eric.Butcher@cdw.com">Eric.Butcher@cdw.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">






<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Ah, nothing in 2.0 (issues wide) that I’ve heard of were particular to UC on UCS, so if its working fine for them, WIN!
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Wingdings;color:#1f497d">J</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">  IIRC the worst issue was related to getting locked out of CIMC when using LDAP integrated authentication,
 etc.  Something to that effect at least.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">Eric Butcher |
</span></b><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:red">CDW
</span></b><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#a6a6a6">Professional Services<u></u><u></u></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Wingdings;color:black">(</span><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black"> <a href="tel:317.569.4282" value="+13175694282" target="_blank">317.569.4282</a> (SNR)
</span><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black">|</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black">
</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Wingdings;color:black">*</span><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black">
<a href="mailto:eric.butcher@cdw.com" target="_blank">eric.butcher@cdw.com</a></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> <a href="mailto:michael.p.king@gmail.com" target="_blank">michael.p.king@gmail.com</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:michael.p.king@gmail.com" target="_blank">michael.p.king@gmail.com</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Mike King<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, November 22, 2011 1:43 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Eric Butcher<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Nick Matthews; Cisco VoIPoE List<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] UC on UCS<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The 2.0 firmware was the decision of the Server team.  I'm just along for the ride.<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Been on it since the 18th, no wacky issues yet.<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Eric Butcher <<a href="mailto:Eric.Butcher@cdw.com" target="_blank">Eric.Butcher@cdw.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">There are no restrictions on the firmware version for UC on UCS.  I would shy away from 2.0 for now
 though.  I’ve seen people posting some goofy issues they’ve had with 2.x and I think there are some small issues to work out.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">Eric Butcher |
</span></b><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:red">CDW
</span></b><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#a6a6a6">Professional Services</span></b><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Wingdings;color:black">(</span><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black"> <a href="tel:317.569.4282" target="_blank">317.569.4282</a>
 (SNR) </span><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black">|</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black">
</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Wingdings;color:black">*</span><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black">
<a href="mailto:eric.butcher@cdw.com" target="_blank">eric.butcher@cdw.com</a></span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Mike King<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, November 19, 2011 3:41 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Nick Matthews</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Cisco VoIPoE List<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] UC on UCS<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p>Ucs version 2.0 is the new firmware for ucs.<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Nov 19, 2011 1:22 PM, "Nick Matthews" <<a href="mailto:matthnick@gmail.com" target="_blank">matthnick@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There aren't any UCS restrictions for UC on UCS<br>
<br>
-nick<br>
<br>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Mike King <<a href="mailto:me@mpking.com" target="_blank">me@mpking.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Does anyone know if UC on UCS is supported on UCS version 2.0<br>
> Mike<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br>
><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>

</blockquote></div>