<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>So the VG224 is trying to connect to to the IP phone to do RTCP?<span><br><br><span name="x"></span>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. <br> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br><span name="x"></span><br></span><br><hr id="zwchr"><b>From: </b>"Wes Sisk" <wsisk@cisco.com><br><b>To: </b>"Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio@uoguelph.ca><br><b>Cc: </b>"Cisco VoIPoE List" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br><b>Sent: </b>Thursday, December 1, 2011 4:20:51 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [cisco-voip] testing new ACLs: VG224 issues<br><br>CM does and phones do not do RTCP. However, it looks like CUCM may default the RTCP port to 4001 during some capabilities and port exchanges.<div><br><div><div>On Dec 1, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 13px;">What is UDP traffic destined to 4001 all about?<br></span></span></div><br></div></div></body></html>