<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>i'm sure there are advantages and disadvantages to both, but I've used the @ macro with associated filters for the last number of years and it works like a charm. troubleshooting is not a problem as far as I know because it presents the matching regexp not the @ pattern when the match is made.<br><br>and with route filters it's very easy to exclude a particular route pattern without having to create an additional route pattern. it's also easier to add a non-contiguous pattern to a route filter as well.<br><br>as always, your particular application, desires, skill set and opinion will obviously dictate what you use, but i really don't think the @ pattern is the evil step-mother everyone makes it out to be.<br><br><br><span><span name="x"></span>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. <br> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br><span name="x"></span><br></span><br><hr id="zwchr"><b>From: </b>"Mike King" <me@mpking.com><br><b>To: </b>"Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio@uoguelph.ca><br><b>Cc: </b>"Mark Holloway" <mh@markholloway.com>, "cisco-voip VOIP" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br><b>Sent: </b>Tuesday, December 20, 2011 1:30:13 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [cisco-voip] Moving to 10 digit dialing<br><br>I found a funny, and thoughtful post on this awhile ago:<div><br></div><div><a href="http://networkingnerd.net/2011/05/26/9-must-die/" target="_blank">http://networkingnerd.net/2011/05/26/9-must-die/</a> </div><div><br></div><div><br></div>
<div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca" target="_blank">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><div style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">Mark makes a good point here for the transition period when 7 digit dialing coincides with 10 digit dialing, 7 digit dialing can be all encompassing, and 10 digit dialing should only be for your area codes. Once the transition is complete, the 10 digit dialing should be all encompassing and the 7 digit dialing should be for specific digit strings. <br>
<br>That would be the way I would go anyways.<br><br><span><span></span>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. <br> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br><span></span><br>
</span><br><hr><b>From: </b>"Mark Holloway" <<a href="mailto:mh@markholloway.com" target="_blank">mh@markholloway.com</a>><br><b>To: </b>"Mike Hyde" <<a href="mailto:mhyde@monitor.mts.net" target="_blank">mhyde@monitor.mts.net</a>><br>
<b>Cc: </b>"cisco-voip VOIP" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br><b>Sent: </b>Tuesday, December 20, 2011 12:35:13 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [cisco-voip] Moving to 10 digit dialing<div>
<div class="h5"><br><br>Sorry, make that $ not ! My brain is in Unix mode today. :)<br><br>dial-peer 7 < Support 7 digit dialing<br>[2-9]......$<br><br>dial-peer 10 < Support 10 digit dialing in your area<br>213[2-9]......$<br>
<br>dial-peer 11 < Support North American Long Distance<br>1[2-9].........$<br><br><br>On Dec 20, 2011, at 10:33 AM, Mark Holloway wrote:<br><br>For clarification, I assume this is for North America? If your area code is 213 you could create the following:<br>
<br>dial-peer 7 < Support 7 digit dialing<br>[2-9]......!<br><br>dial-peer 10 < Support 10 digit dialing in your area<br>213[2-9]......!<br><br>dial-peer 11 < Support North American Long Distance<br>1[2-9].........!<br>
<br><br>When your area switches to 10 digit and it is enforced by your telco, you could prepend 213 to the dialed digits in dial-peer 7 if needed.<br><br><br>On Dec 20, 2011, at 9:36 AM, Mike Hyde wrote:<br><br>> Is there a way on a CME/UC5** series system to have both 7 and 10 digit dialing? Our area is switching to 10 digit dial next year, so we are looking at configuring the system with both till the cutover is done.<br>
> <br>> <br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
</div></div></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></body></html>