<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>You can still have a form of redundancy using SRST, we have deployed Business Edition with SRST as failover. No the the best solution, but it is cost effective</div><div><br></div><div>Stephen<br><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On 13 Jan 2012, at 17:41, "Fred Hunt" <<a href="mailto:fhunt@cogdell.com">fhunt@cogdell.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Currently we have one publisher and one subscriber in one office and a subscriber in a remote office. A company split is occurring and I am wondering if I can take the remote site subscriber and make it an independent publisher. I’ve
heard that it is against Cisco best practices to only have a publisher and no subscribers, but I cannot find anything explicitly stating that. My “Administering Cisco Unified Communications Manager 7.0” book states “While it is possible to have a Cisco Unified
Communications Manager cluster of only one server, it is not recommended due to the lack of failover protection if the server fails.” I am aware of the risk involved due to lack of redundancy, but this may only be temporary.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Is anyone aware of documentation that specifically states this is unsupported?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Does anybody have experience operating with only a publisher?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Is there a process involved to convert a subscriber to a publisher?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Fred<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>cisco-voip mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a></span><br><span><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>