Yea, Dell is definitely Number 2<div><br></div><div><a href="http://gigaom.com/2012/01/18/cisco-touts-10000-ucs-customers/">http://gigaom.com/2012/01/18/cisco-touts-10000-ucs-customers/</a> </div><div>or<br><a href="http://gigaom2.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/screen-shot-2012-01-17-at-12-37-23-pm.jpg">http://gigaom2.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/screen-shot-2012-01-17-at-12-37-23-pm.jpg</a> for just the chart.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Cisco is still grouped in the "Other Catagory"</div><div><br></div><div>If I read the chart right, Dell shipped half a million servers in 3rd quarter of last year.  Cisco just had they're 10,000 sale. (After three years)  That's a significant difference.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Mike<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Jason Gurtz <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jasongurtz@npumail.com">jasongurtz@npumail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">> Still no roadmap for Dell.<br>
<br>
</div>I am also intrigued by the lack of Dell validation. We're primarily an HP<br>
shop, so not really affected here, but it seems odd to me when the #2 (I<br>
think?) server vendor is explicitly called-out as unsupported. My boss<br>
says, "maybe Dell doesn't do good enough hardware QC." ;)<br>
<br>
Anyone have insight on the vetting process?<br>
<br>
~JasonG<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>