<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:703484547;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:-742634910 67698705 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-text:"%1\)";
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level2
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level3
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level5
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level6
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level8
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level9
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0in;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>One correction:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Scalability: I’ve had customers running Exchange UM with 100 ports simultaneously on a server (100 is the default voicemail port count) without a single problem. At the same time, I’ve seen Unity servers have issues with 40-50 ports at the same time. It all comes down to how it was installed and implemented. If done correctly, you would not have issues in either case.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>IM Integration:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Lync 2010 only supports one voicemail platform, and that is, of course, Exchange UM. I know Jabber is going to be great, but it may be too late for many companies.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Another addition to your list:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Message transcribing:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Exchange has a limitation to the number of messages it can transcribe. Basically, one message can be transcribed per minute per core. If your server gets more than this, they are not transcribed. They are not put in a queue either, as this is done after the message is received but before it is sent to the user. If busy, transcribing is skipped and sent to the user’s inbox. Once it is sent, it will not go back and transcribe later.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>However, the only alternative today with Unity Connection is the transcription service with Nuance where your message is forwarded to Nuance Corp where it is transcribed and returned back to your system. This means all messages are transcribed. For security concerns, that could be an issue, not to mention the ~ 5 minute delay to receive your voicemail message and of course the per-user licensing costs associated. Hopefully CUC 9 will resolve this limitation and do it natively.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Thanks!<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Matt<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Grant Teague<br><b>Sent:</b> Friday, February 24, 2012 2:16 PM<br><b>To:</b> bill@hitechconnection.net<br><b>Cc:</b> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.5 integration with Exchange 2010 for Voice mail<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>Hi Bill<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Here is 10 reason why Unity CxN over Exchange 2010.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:10.0pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Separate Message Store for Discovery and Compliance Purposes </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>a.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Exchange UM stores email and voicemail on the same server </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:.5in'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>b.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Unity Connection stores voice messages separately from the email store overcoming legal discoverability concerns </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:10.0pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Enterprise Scalability </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>a.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Exchange UM experiences issues at as low as 40 ports in use per server (MCS 7845 equivalent) </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:.5in'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>b.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Unity Connection 8.6 scales to 250 ports per server (MCS 7845 equivalent) </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:10.0pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Virtualization Support </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>a.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Microsoft announced support for virtualization in May 2011. Requires 4 physical processor cores at all times. </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:.5in'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>b.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Unity Connection 8.6 supports virtualization on Cisco UCS, HP, and IBM platforms </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:10.0pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Environmental Dependencies </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>a.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Exchange UM depends on Active Directory and 3 Exchange server roles to operate </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:.5in'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>b.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Unity Connection offers optional integrations with Active Directory and Microsoft Exchange (TTS, calendaring, import contacts) </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:10.0pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>High Availability </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>a.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Microsoft requires 4x the number of servers to achieve an equivalent SLA as Unity Connection (2 GC’s, 2 Mailbox servers, 2 UM servers, 2 Hub Transport servers) </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:.5in'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>b.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Unity Connection provides 2-server Active/Active clustering solutions for High Availability </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:10.0pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Architecture</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>a.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Exchange UM supports centralized messaging only, no SRSV-like functionality. There’s no support of networking with 3<sup>rd</sup>-party voicemail systems</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:.5in'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>b.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Unity Connection 8.6 supports both centralized and distributed messaging, SRST, SRSV, and supports networking with other Cisco voicemail systems and 3<sup>rd</sup>-party voicemail systems </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:10.0pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Voicemail Interoperability </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>a.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Microsoft Exchange UM does not support networking with 3<sup>rd</sup>-party voicemail systems. </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:.5in'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>b.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Cisco Unity Connection supports VPIM networking </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:10.0pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Client Support </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>a.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Exchange UM supports Outlook, OWA, OVA, ASR, Windows Mobile, and other mobile clients via mp3 </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:.5in'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>b.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Unity Connection supports Outlook, OWA, Lotus Notes, numerous other IMAP clients. Unity Inbox, Cisco Jabber, Visual Voicemail, IBM Lotus Sametime, CUPC, mobile clients via CUMC/CUMA, RSS Feeds </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:10.0pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Secure Messaging </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>a.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Exchange UM requires Rights Management Service (RMS) for private messages (additional server, license) </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:.5in'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>b.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Natively supports secure, private messaging and optionally also securely deletes messages from hard drive </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:10.0pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Calendaring </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>a.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Exchange UM supports calendaring in Exchange 2007 and 2010 </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:.5in'><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>b.</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Unity Connection supports calendaring in Exchange 2003, 2007, and 2010 </span><o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>hope this helps.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>regards<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>Grant<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 1:29 PM, <a href="mailto:bill@hitechconnection.net">bill@hitechconnection.net</a> <<a href="mailto:bill@hitechconnection.net">bill@hitechconnection.net</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p><div><p>So I still don’t see a compelling reason to tell a customer not to go with Exchange 2010 and dump Unity / Unity Connection if they already own the E-CAL for exchange 2010 as part of their EA agreement with Microsoft? To tell them they have more nobs to turn is not going to go very far. I am looking for real technical limitations of Exchange 2010 Vs. Unity Connection.<o:p></o:p></p><p> <o:p></o:p></p><div style='margin-top:3.75pt;margin-bottom:3.75pt'><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><br>On February 23, 2012 at 5:03 PM Nate VanMaren <<a href="mailto:VanMarenNP@ldschurch.org" target="_blank">VanMarenNP@ldschurch.org</a>> wrote: <br><br>> It’s not very bad at all. But Unity Connection 8.5+ is a much more full featured voicemail system, and you get nice single inbox. There are a lot more knobs in Connection to control how stuff works. <br>> <br>> Just depends on the needs. <br>> <br>> From: <a href="mailto:bill@hitechconnection.net" target="_blank">bill@hitechconnection.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:bill@hitechconnection.net" target="_blank">bill@hitechconnection.net</a>] <br>> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 2:14 PM <br>> To: Jason Aarons (AM); Nate VanMaren; Gr <br>> Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> <br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.5 integration with Exchange 2010 for Voice mail <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> So beside these two things why is the Exchange 2010 UM so bad? I am having a hard time from a competitive standpoint convincing someone NOT to dump unity / unity connection and move directly to Exchange 2010 UM when they have the E-CAL already as part of their enterprise agreement. <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> On February 17, 2012 at 5:02 PM Nate VanMaren <<a href="mailto:VanMarenNP@ldschurch.org" target="_blank">VanMarenNP@ldschurch.org</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:VanMarenNP@ldschurch.org" target="_blank">VanMarenNP@ldschurch.org</a>>> wrote: <br>> <br>> > Yea there isn’t really “ports” that you have to worry about on the SIP integrations, just max number of calls. <br>> > <br>> > You will still need a VM pilot and profile, and then a route pattern that points to the sip trunk that is pointed at exchange UM. <br>> > <br>> > <a href="http://www.agileit.com/Blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=820" target="_blank">http://www.agileit.com/Blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=820</a> <br>> > <br>> > <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=13591" target="_blank">http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=13591</a> <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > From: Gr [mailto:<a href="mailto:grccie@gmail.com" target="_blank">grccie@gmail.com</a>]<mailto:[mailto:<a href="mailto:grccie@gmail.com" target="_blank">grccie@gmail.com</a>]> <br>> > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 3:00 PM <br>> > To: Jason Aarons (AM); Nate VanMaren <br>> > Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>> <br>> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.5 integration with Exchange 2010 for Voice mail <br>> > <br>> > Thanks Nate, Jason! Valuable information, I will keep this in mind. <br>> > <br>> > Another question is we just create voice mail pilot in cucm and route it to sip trunk and then in exchange 2010 we create voice mail pilot and the actual voice mail ports? <br>> > <br>> > Thanks, <br>> > GR <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > Sent from my iPhone <br>> > <br>> > On 18/02/2012, at 4:35 AM, "Jason Aarons (AM)" <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com" target="_blank">jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com" target="_blank">jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com" target="_blank">jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com</a>%<a href="mailto:3cmailto%3Ajason.aarons@dimensiondata.com" target="_blank">3cmailto:jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com</a>>>> wrote: <br>> > I think I understand that Exchange 2010 has a crappy sip stack. Good info. <lol> <br>> > <br>> > From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>%<a href="mailto:3cmailto%3Acisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">3cmailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>>> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>]<mailto:[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>]><mailto:[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>]> On Behalf Of Nate VanMaren <br>> > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 11:03 AM <br>> > To: gr11; <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>%<a href="mailto:3cmailto%3Acisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">3cmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>>> <br>> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.5 integration with Exchange 2010 for Voice mail <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > Two things off the top of my head. <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > 1. Exchange has a crappy sip stack. So you have to use a MTP on the SIP trunk because it won’t deal with RTP source/destination changes in a session. Like when someone does a supervised transfer to voicemail. <br>> > <br>> > 2. Exchange has a crappy sip stack. So if you want correct caller name on the voicemail on call transferred to voicemail, you have to run the transfer through an app that waits for the transferee to complete the transfer to send the call to exchange. <br>> > <br>> > Voicemail preview takes a lot of hardware. I think our boxes are quad core with 8/16gb of ram and 4-5 calls will max out the CPU. <br>> > <br>> > -Nate <br>> > <br>> > From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>%<a href="mailto:3cmailto%3Acisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">3cmailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>>> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>]<mailto:[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>]><mailto:[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>]> On Behalf Of gr11 <br>> > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 5:17 PM <br>> > To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>%<a href="mailto:3cmailto%3Acisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">3cmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>>> <br>> > Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.5 integration with Exchange 2010 for Voice mail <br>> > <br>> > Hi List, <br>> > <br>> > I am providing the CUCM8.5 integration with exchange 2010 for a customer for their voice mail needs. The customer has an old unity server that will be decommissioned and voice mail functionality will be provided by exchange 2010 UM. <br>> > <br>> > Anyone who has done this before, any pitfalls or things to be aware of? We are going to use a third party gateway for SIP Trunk termination to/from CUCM and exchange <br>> > <br>> > Thanks, <br>> > GR <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > itevomcid <o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><br><br clear=all><br>-- <br>keep living the dream<o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>