<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>I'll try that out. But the calls from the PBX thru CallManager are using the same "CallManager" settings...<span><br><br><span name="x"></span>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. <br> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br><span name="x"></span><br></span><br><hr id="zwchr"><b>From: </b>"Matthew Loraditch" <MLoraditch@heliontechnologies.com><br><b>To: </b>"Mike Olivere" <mikeeo@msn.com>, "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio@uoguelph.ca><br><b>Cc: </b>"cisco-voip" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br><b>Sent: </b>Thursday, March 1, 2012 3:40:18 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>RE: [cisco-voip] Calling Party Number not showing up on some carriers sets (most of the time)<br><br>
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">We have seen the same thing with at&t wireless here in the states. It in some cases helps to force your Calling Party ISDN type and plan to whatever settings
they should be for the numbers you send, rather than let CCM decide which can end up with them coming out as unknown/unknown.
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Matthew G. Loraditch - CCVP, CCNA, CCDA<br>
</span><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><br>
1965 Greenspring Drive</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><br>
</span><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Timonium, MD 21093</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><br>
</span><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><br>
voice. 410.252.8830<br>
fax. 410.252.9284 <br>
<br>
<a href="http://twitter.com/heliontech" target="_blank">Twitter</a> | <a href="http://www.facebook.com/#%21/pages/Helion/252157915296" target="_blank">
Facebook</a> | <a href="http://www.heliontechnologies.com/" target="_blank">Website</a> | <a href="mailto:support@heliontechnologies.com?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request" target="_blank">
Email Support</a></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Mike Olivere<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, March 01, 2012 3:30 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Lelio Fulgenzi<br>
<b>Cc:</b> cisco-voip<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] Calling Party Number not showing up on some carriers sets (most of the time)</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
Did you debug q931 and compare legacy pbx to cisco cm outputs?</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
Sent from my iPhone</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
On Mar 1, 2012, at 3:24 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca" target="_blank">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>> wrote:</p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black"><br>
OK, here's a weird one.<br>
<br>
We have had complaints about calls from our campus showing up as Unknown to a certain (Rogers) carrier.
<br>
<br>
I've done some testing and can replicate the problem using different phones, different gateways, different telco providers (Telus, Bell), etc. All show the same results. Unknown to Rogers customers, but the correct number to other carrier customers (Bell).<br>
<br>
The one anomaly is when an outbound call is placed from one of our legacy PBX phones which are connected to our Cisco system via T1/PRI. Calls from these phones have the correct calling party number displayed on Rogers clients phones.<br>
<br>
I've tried to replicate (albeit one at a time) any difference between the call routing from the HiCom vs the IP phone and no difference in the outcome.<br>
<br>
Anybody have any clue what might be causing this?<br>
<br>
My first thought is that it is a Rogers issue, but the fact that we are sending the number out for a particular group of users and it works fine has me thinking. Could the calls be marked slightly differently and this difference is not recognized by Rogers?<br>
<br>
The problem only started happening a few months ago.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. <br>
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br>
<br>
</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div></body></html>