<html dir="ltr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-3">
<style id="owaParaStyle">P {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px
}
</style>
</head>
<body fPStyle="1" ocsi="0">
<div style="direction: ltr;font-family: Tahoma;color: #000000;font-size: 10pt;">
<p>Hi,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>why not a ISR G2 with SRE-300 module? The SRE is the AIM evolution for router applications, including CUE.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Ruben</p>
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 16px">
<hr tabindex="-1">
<div style="DIRECTION: ltr" id="divRpF354360"><font color="#000000" size="2" face="Tahoma"><b>From:</b> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] on behalf of Erick Wellnitz [ewellnitzvoip@gmail.com]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 26 March 2012 16:03<br>
<b>To:</b> Mehmet Turunc<br>
<b>Cc:</b> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] A solution similar to CUE<br>
</font><br>
</div>
<div></div>
<div><br>
<br>
<div>Check out the BE 3000. It's pretty slick and the cost is fairly reasonable.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>You get call control, video, VM, auto attendant and two T1/E1 ports. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Mehmet Turunc <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mehmet.turunc@buka.com.tr" target="_blank">mehmet.turunc@buka.com.tr</a>></span> wrote:<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">
Hi Baris,<br>
Because of license cost I am thinking a smaller solution.<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Buka Teknoloji<br>
<br>
----- Original Message -----<br>
From: Barış Gülten [mailto:<a href="mailto:barisgulten@gmail.com" target="_blank">barisgulten@gmail.com</a>]<br>
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 02:07 PM<br>
To: Mehmet Turunc<br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] A solution similar to CUE<br>
<br>
Hi Mehmet,<br>
Why didnt you try cucm bussiness edition. You can use vmware if they have virtualised servers.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Baris.<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone<br>
<br>
On 25 Mar 2012, at 11:09, Mehmet Turunc <<a href="mailto:mehmet.turunc@buka.com.tr" target="_blank">mehmet.turunc@buka.com.tr</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi experts,<br>
> I've read that CUE is end of sale. We use UC5xx for customer VM and IVR functions right now.<br>
> I will increase the number of users by positioning a CME with 2921. How can I solve the VM and IVR function by adding other than a new UC5xx solution?<br>
> Regards,<br>
> MT<br>
><br>
> Buka Teknoloji<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<font color="white">itevomcid</font> </div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>