<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>yeah, it's a bit of a pain. it took me a while, but i was able to lay out a plan for our toll bypass filters which even if fully populated to one digit less than a wild card, i'm just under. it worked out well. by one digit less a wildcard i mean where i can't use [!8] or [2-9] or something like that.<br><br>the thing that irks me is, with relational databases like they are, there's no reason to store the whole human readable clause. why should it read something like: <br><br>(OFFICE-CODE == 82[018] AND LOCAL-AREA-CODE == 226 AND TRANSIT-NETWORK-ESCAPE DOES-NOT-EXIST) <br><br>the clauses themselves take up the most of the characters here. while it's great that it's easily readable, i would think that it could be stored more efficiently. just saying.<br><br>lelio<br><span><br><span name="x"></span>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. <br> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br><span name="x"></span><br></span><br><hr id="zwchr"><b>From: </b>"Andy" <andy.carse@gmail.com><br><b>To: </b>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br><b>Sent: </b>Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:58:10 AM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [cisco-voip] route filter length -GBNP<br><br>Thanks for the info I'll have another go now with the limit in mind.<br><br>Rgds<br><br>Andy<br><br><br>On 26/04/2012 13:29, Matthew Loraditch wrote:<br>> Yes this is still the same. The error is shall we say badly worded<br>><br>> Matthew G. Loraditch - CCVP, CCNA, CCDA<br>><br>> 1965 Greenspring Drive<br>> Timonium, MD 21093<br>><br>> voice. 410.252.8830<br>> fax. 410.252.9284<br>><br>> Twitter | Facebook | Website | Email Support<br>><br>> ________________________________________<br>> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] on behalf of Lelio Fulgenzi [lelio@uoguelph.ca]<br>> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 8:23 AM<br>> To: Andy<br>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] route filter length -GBNP<br>><br>> The route filter can not be greater than 1023 (or 10 24) characters I believe. This is from tests I completed in v4. I don't believe there have been any changes to this limitation.<br>><br>> Sent from my iPhone...<br>><br>> "There's no place like 127.0.0.1"<br>><br>> On Apr 26, 2012, at 8:15 AM, Andy<andy.carse@gmail.com> wrote:<br>><br>>> Hi,<br>>> Has anyone come accross an issue with route filters and the number of clauses in a particular filter?<br>>> I'm using dp-ffr.3-1-21.GB.cop.sgn with CCM 8.5.1.13900-5<br>>> If I add more than 20 clauses when you click save it replies<br>>> "Access to the requested resource has been denied".<br>>><br>>> I'll try to thin out the clauses, but just wondered if its a know issue.<br>>><br>>> --<br>>> Rgds<br>>><br>>> Andy<br>>><br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br></div></body></html>