<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<span style="font-family:Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:black">I have a wireshark of 7965 sccp load 9.2 doing port 69 from Friday with UCM 8.5.1SU3.
<br>
<br>
What version load does http 6970?<br>
<br>
Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)<br>
<br>
<span style="color:black">-----Original Message----- <br>
<b>From:</b> Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) [rratliff@cisco.com]<br>
<b>Received:</b> Sunday, 13 May 2012, 7:20pm<br>
<b>To:</b> Jason Aarons (AM) [jason.aarons@us.didata.com]<br>
<b>CC:</b> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net [cisco-voip@puck.nether.net]; ariemer@amnet.net.au [ariemer@amnet.net.au]<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] 7965G delays registering on SCCP v9 firmware<br>
<br>
</span></span>
<div>
<div>All recent loads actually use http for tftp operations. It is over tcp port 6970 so isn't super obvious. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>To the problem I'd definitely look at a packet capture on both ends. Any devices doing wan acceleration or inspection?<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone</div>
<div><br>
On May 13, 2012, at 12:32 PM, "Jason Aarons (AM)" <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com">jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<div></div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--><span style="font-family:Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:black">This
seems normall But tftp time is tied directly to latency delay as every packet is acked, and 512k max packet size.
<br>
<br>
Peer firmware sharing and load server could help.<br>
<br>
What exact version 8x to 9x?<br>
<br>
Hopefully the switch to https or is around the corner. Tftp is great with small files but not large phone loads. The VIP12/30 had smaller loads.<br>
<br>
Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (<a href="http://www.nitrodesk.com">www.nitrodesk.com</a>)<br>
<br>
<span style="color:black">-----Original Message----- <br>
<b>From:</b> Aaron Riemer [<a href="mailto:ariemer@amnet.net.au">ariemer@amnet.net.au</a>]<br>
<b>Received:</b> Sunday, 13 May 2012, 2:36am<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> [<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>]<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [cisco-voip] 7965G delays registering on SCCP v9 firmware<br>
<br>
</span></span>
<div><br>
<br>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hey guys,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We are gradually upgrading our fleet of 7965G's to SCCP v9 software from v8.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We have found an issue at remote sites (higher latency) where phones (with any 9.x firmware) are taking upward of 10-20 minutes to register! This delay seems to only occur when a full power off / power on occurs.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Downgrade the phones back to v8.x and whola! No problem.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We are going to try and simulate this in the lab with a WAN sim and then probably get TAC involved. I suspect it has something to do with the extra latency involved but as mentioned we have had no trouble with v8.x software.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Has anyone come across this problem? It seems a bit oddball I know.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Any hints or suggestions are most welcome.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Aaron.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<font color="white">itevomcid</font> </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>cisco-voip mailing list</span><br>
<span><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a></span><br>
<span><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a></span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>