if I recall it seems to round robin to the IPs. I would recommend using multiple SIP trunks in CM and controlling your routing via RL/RG.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Ted Nugent <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tednugent73@gmail.com" target="_blank">tednugent73@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Does anyone know (have tested) that the multiple hosts on the SIP trunk will actually provide failover if the primary host goes done? If that's the case then no need to make a-records right?<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Ted Nugent <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tednugent73@gmail.com" target="_blank">tednugent73@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote">
That's what I was afraid of... Was allowing multiple host entries in the SIP trunk configuration put in place to get around this at least in a failover configuration? This "enhancement" has been open for WELL over a year!<div>
<div><br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Ryan Ratliff <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com" target="_blank">rratliff@cisco.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word"><blockquote type="cite">Status: Open(Assigned)<br></blockquote><div><br></div>Not resolved yet. Use A records as a workaround.<div><br><div>
<span style="text-transform:none;text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;word-spacing:0px;white-space:normal;border-collapse:separate">-Ryan</span>
</div>
<br><div><div><div><div>On Nov 14, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Ted Nugent <<a href="mailto:tednugent73@gmail.com" target="_blank">tednugent73@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br><div>Is it possible this is still unresolved or maybe been resolved in a duplicate bug id? HOPEFULLY!</div>
<div>Does anyone know if this was resolved by 8.6.2?</div><div> </div><div><strong>CSCth25928 Bug Details</strong></div>
<form method="post" name="13b064c463cf013a_13b04a3e151c952a_13b0479aba8b7a4e_btkAlternateDataForm" target="_blank" onsubmit="return window.confirm("You are submitting information to an external page.\nAre you sure?");">
<input name="appContext" value="/Support/BugToolKit" type="hidden"><div>
<table border="0" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="5" width="100%"><tbody><tr><td style="padding:8px;font-size:88%" colspan="2"><span><strong> Change the behavior for invoking additional DNS SRV queries </strong></span></td>
</tr><tr><td style="padding:0px 8px 8px;font-size:88%" valign="top"><span><b>Symptom:</b><br>When the Primary server is down CM does not try the second server mentioned in<br>the SRV record.<br>Even when the timer expires it resets the timer and again starts sending the<br>
NOTIFY request to Primary DNS SRV record.</span></td></tr></tbody></table></div></form><div><table border="0" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="5" width="100%"></table></div></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
</div><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>