<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-AU" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Thanks for your experiences.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Yes I always change to IP addressing for Intra-cluster comms so was surprised to see this error.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Regarding CUC 9.0 MWI not supporting E.164 numbers. I get the following errors when setting the MWI numbers:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" border="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" style="padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt"></td>
<td style="padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">Mwi On Code contains invalid characters.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Cheers<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Dana<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Nate VanMaren [mailto:VanMarenNP@ldschurch.org]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, 21 February 2013 2:12 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Dana Tong; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)<br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: UC 9 Experiences / Oddities<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D">1<sup>st</sup> I don’t play with CUP so I cannot speak to that.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D">2<sup>nd</sup> item, I always change to IP addresses, but I also always have CA signed certs that include the ip address as a SAN, but I haven’t seen any trouble.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D">3<sup>rd</sup> item, Unity Connection has supported E.164s for everything but primary extension since 8.6.1. In 9.0 the added primary extension, I am running 9.0 CUC right now and I know MWIs with
+ still work.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"><a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/release/notes/861cucrn.html#wp1137907">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/release/notes/861cucrn.html#wp1137907</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D">4<sup>th</sup> Item, I haven’t seen case sensitive usernames for a long long time, I know 9.0 and 9.1 using active directory LDAP the usernames are not case sensitive.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D">You may want to open a TAC case on these issues, because it’s stuff that should be working.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D">-Nate<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Dana Tong<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, February 20, 2013 3:29 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> (<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>)<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [cisco-voip] UC 9 Experiences / Oddities<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Morning (evening) all, <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I was wondering what everyone thought of the new version 9 suite. What have the experiences been like?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Just some things I have noticed…<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Firstly I had installed CUCM 9.1 and CUC 9.0 in my lab which was fine and then went to install CUP 9.1.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Tried to do the upgrade during install (both via local and SFTP) and CUP reports invalid upgrade file.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Installed CUP 9.0 and it would not integrate with CUCM because of a version mismatch.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I had to roll back my CUCM cluster to 9.0, integrate with CUP 9.0, then roll forward. After this CUP 9.1 installed ok.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">2nd,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I changed my Enterprise URLs to be IP addresses instead of hostnames and it broke my EM and directory services.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I had to regenerate the Tomcat certs and restart the service to fix the EM login service.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">3rd,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">CUC 9.0 does not support E.164 MWI numbers. Does anyone know if 9.1 supports E.164 all over?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">When using Calling Party Transformations, the numbers presented to CUC are the transformed number so I had to set alternate extensions for my users who have E.164 DNs.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">4<sup>th</sup>,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">CUCM v9.0 has case sensitive usernames for authentication (ie end user pages, presence, CTI).<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Does anyone know if 9.1 is the same? Our internal system is AD integrated and for some reason the usernames have capitals and fails if I use all lowercase.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">However on this LAB system which is not AD integrated it seems to ignore case in usernames (which I would prefer)<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Cheers<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dana<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#666666"><br>
<br>
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#666666"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>