<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'><br>i'm hoping if PRI's are available, BRI's are as well. but i could be reaching on that one. worse comes to worse, i can keep the PRI there and just have 4 PSTN connectivities.<br><br>and you're talking disconnect issues on the FXO side, right?<br><span><br><span name="x"></span>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. <br> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br><span name="x"></span><br></span><br><hr id="zwchr"><b>From: </b>"Scott Voll" <svoll.voip@gmail.com><br><b>To: </b>"Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio@uoguelph.ca><br><b>Cc: </b>"Cisco VoIP List" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br><b>Sent: </b>Thursday, March 21, 2013 3:00:33 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [cisco-voip] 2xBRI vs 4xFXO at remote site<br><br><div dir="ltr">For Caller ID alone I would take the BRI over FXO. then factor in the Disconnect issues.<div><br></div><div style="">Not sure if BRI is available everywhere. Might check with local Telco.</div><div style=""><br>
</div><div style="">YMMV</div><div style=""><br></div><div style="">Scott</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca" target="_blank">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana"><br>Any thoughts on 2xBRI vs 4xFXO at a remote site? I'm road mapping our telephony infrastructure and would like to propose a scenario whereby we remove our PRI connectivity at the remote sites and have a few lines for emergency inbound/outbound calling. I like the simplicity of the digital PRI interfaces and I'm assuming the same would be of the BRI options.<br>
<br>Experiences, good or bad, would be great to hear. <br><span><br><span></span>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. <br> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)<br><span></span><br>
</span><br></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></body></html>