<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>DO any of the SBC’s out there have a good API?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black'>Dennis Heim | </span></b><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>Sr. Unified Collaboration Team Lead & Solution Architect </span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black'>World Wide Technology | 314.212.1814 | <a href="mailto:dennis.heim@wwt.com">dennis.heim@wwt.com</a><b><o:p></o:p></b></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black'>“Creating Impact, Ignition & Scalability”<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] <b>On Behalf Of </b>randal k<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, May 15, 2013 1:57 PM<br><b>To:</b> Cisco VOIP<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] Recommended SIP SBC<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>I too have been trying to get a software-only eval of Acme and have been stonewalled by an unresponsive sales team. Sonus has been OK but a bit slow. Sansay, on the other hand, has been very responsive and has aggressive pricing, a good UI and a solid feature set, although they are small.<br><br>We are also in the ~150-200 concurrent session land -- too small for huge, too big to use open-everything -- and believe that the "virtual SBC" concept is incredibly hot and we *really* want it ... but ... it's really hard to get. Everyone wants to sell a box (sansay/sonus), just isn't selling anything (acme), or has targeted virtual SBC at huge networks instead of small (metaswitch).<o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal>Let me know how it goes for you!<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Robert Kulagowski <<a href="mailto:rkulagow@gmail.com" target="_blank">rkulagow@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>[Sorry for breaking the thread, but original message is gone.]<br><br>Other than Acme Packet, has anyone else deployed something like a<br>Sonus? The merger with Oracle seems to be slowing things down over<br>there, and I may not be able to get equipment from the Demo Depot<br>until after they're done merging, and in the 3 weeks since our meeting<br>the AP sales guy still hasn't gotten me a copy of the "software only"<br>SBC to even start an eval even though I keep pestering him.<br><br>Something that can do 200 simultaneous sessions is what we're looking<br>for, G.711, no fancy transcoding required.<br><br>I found a SBC comparison report, but it's $3400, so a bit expensive,<br>but the executive summary put Sonus as their choice.<br><br>If you have experience with multiple SBCs and can go into why one and<br>not another then that's an added bonus.<br><br>Thanks.<br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></body></html>