<div dir="ltr">Hi Dana,<div><br></div><div style>I don't have an answer although it sounds interesting. You might want to pose the question to the cisco-nsp mailing list also if you haven't already:</div><div style>
<a href="http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp">http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp</a><br></div><div style><br></div><div style><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Dana Tong <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Dana_Tong@bridgepoint.com.au" target="_blank">Dana_Tong@bridgepoint.com.au</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<span style="font-family:Arial">Hi all,<br>
<br>
What would be the capacity of a 2951 performing per site shaping, classification, marking,and prioritization?<br>
<br>
I had configured A triple nested policy-map but I don't think the 2951 can cut it. I imagine it might be ok for half a dozen sites.
<br>
But this instance has 50 sites, and a massive over subscription at the HQ. With the 48 or so sites, the output from the show policy-map was over 5000 lines.
<br>
<br>
Is there a better way of doing this? Or is the router just not have enough grunt? SVTI and DVTI are not an option as a service provider manages the branch routers.
<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Dana Tong. <br>
<br>
<br>
</span>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Ed Leatherman<br>
</div>