<div dir="ltr"><div>So a couple things I found...</div><div> </div><div><a href="http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/vtgsca/VTGServlet">http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/vtgsca/VTGServlet</a></div><div>Shows support for 79x0G for 8.6 but not 9.x</div>
<div> </div><div><a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified/communications/system/versions/IPTMtrix.html">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified/communications/system/versions/IPTMtrix.html</a></div>
<div>Doesn't show anything other than 79x1 as far back as 6.x</div><div> </div><div><a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/compat/ccmcompmatr1.pdf">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/compat/ccmcompmatr1.pdf</a></div>
<div>Lists a default load for 79x0G which would lead you to beleive it is supported.</div><div> </div><div><a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6788/phones/ps379/end_of_life_notice_c51-574072.html">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6788/phones/ps379/end_of_life_notice_c51-574072.html</a></div>
<div>Lists EO SW Maintenance 2011 and EO HW Support 2015</div><div> </div><div>None of this paints a clear picture and I can see how some may be confused attempting to interpret this.</div><div> </div><div>Any one have anything more concrete for 79x0 support for 9.x+... Love to hear from Cisco on this as to what the "official" unofficial stance is... :-)</div>
<div> </div><div>Thanks</div><div>Ted</div><div> </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Ted Nugent <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tednugent73@gmail.com" target="_blank">tednugent73@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Interesting.... I'm actually taking the word of one of our senior presales engineers.... going to have to research that myself and find out where he is getting his information and/or why he's been preaching this... thanks for pointing this out this could save some deals for sure.</div>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Matthew Loraditch <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:MLoraditch@heliontechnologies.com" target="_blank">MLoraditch@heliontechnologies.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote">
<div lang="EN-US" vlink="purple" link="blue">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">It does, I have plenty on 9.1 already. Granted it’s supported in that they work, not that TAC will do anything for you if a problem is isolated to be in those
models. That however has been the same for a while, including 8.6, so I’m not sure what documentation you’ve been reading but it’s quite wrong. If you are a partner or in CUG his has been addressed in a couple of different briefings about 9.1.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:10pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA<br>
</span><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt"><br>
1965 Greenspring Drive</span><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><br>
</span><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">Timonium, MD 21093</span><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><br>
</span><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt"><br>
voice. <a href="tel:410.252.8830" target="_blank" value="+14102528830">410.252.8830</a><br>
fax. <a href="tel:410.252.9284" target="_blank" value="+14102529284">410.252.9284</a> <br>
<br>
</span><a href="http://twitter.com/heliontech" target="_blank"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">Twitter</span></a><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt"> |
</span><a href="http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296" target="_blank"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">Facebook</span></a><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt"> |
</span><a href="http://www.heliontechnologies.com/" target="_blank"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">Website</span></a><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt"> |
</span><a href="mailto:support@heliontechnologies.com?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request" target="_blank"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">Email Support</span></a><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom:12pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border-width:1pt medium medium;border-style:solid none none;border-color:rgb(225,225,225) currentColor currentColor;padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">From:</span></b><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"> cisco-voip [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Mike <br></span><div>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, August 19, 2013 5:34 PM<br>
</div><b>To:</b> 'Ted Nugent'; 'Fred Hunt'<div><br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating from CUCM 7.1.3 to CUCM 8.6.2<u></u><u></u></div><p></p>
<p></p></p></div>
</div><div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt">I thought 9.1 supported 7940/60 phones?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div style="border-width:1pt medium medium;border-style:solid none none;border-color:rgb(181,196,223) currentColor currentColor;padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";font-size:10pt">From:</span></b><span style="font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";font-size:10pt"> cisco-voip [</span><a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank"><span style="font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";font-size:10pt">mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</span></a><span style="font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";font-size:10pt">]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Ted Nugent<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, August 19, 2013 4:46 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Fred Hunt<br>
<b>Cc:</b> </span><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank"><span style="font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";font-size:10pt">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</span></a><span style="font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";font-size:10pt"><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating from CUCM 7.1.3 to CUCM 8.6.2<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">We've proposed "drive to 9.x" to many customers recently and the biggest argument against this that we've hit was that most of our clients are running 79x0 phones which will not be supported, all of these clients budgeted for the upgrade,
UCS and professional services but not the phones, even with incentives from Cisco this has been a giant hurdle. Most have decided to stop at 8.6 and will budget for phones next year.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p style="margin-bottom:12pt" class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Fred Hunt <<a href="mailto:FHunt@erdman.com" target="_blank">FHunt@erdman.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I’m interested in migrating to CUCM 8.6.2 running on VMs considering that 7.1.x is getting closer to the end of support. I’ve been working to determine the appropriate process
to follow, but have a question that is not addressed in the documentation that I reviewed. Both of our current servers are model 7835-H2, which is only supported for use in a bridge upgrade, not for production use. The system requirements for 8.6.x call
for 4 GB RAM and 146 GB disks. Our servers currently have 2 GB RAM and 72 GB disks. Will I be able to use these servers for the bridge upgrade even though they don’t meet these requirements?<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks for any input.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(136,136,136)">Fred Hunt<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p style="margin-bottom:12pt" class="MsoNormal"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>