<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">
Just because the system test folks don't test something doesn't make it not supported.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The actual compatibility info I'd say is at <a href="http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/vtgsca/VTGServlet">http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/vtgsca/VTGServlet</a> (linked from software compatibility matrix).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>At the end of the day unless the UCM version or endpoint has reached end of life (or at least end of sw maintenance) then TAC won't reject your call outright. </div>
<div><br>
<div>-Ryan </div>
<br>
<div>
<div>On Jul 9, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Anthony Holloway <<a href="mailto:avholloway+cisco-voip@gmail.com">avholloway+cisco-voip@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div>Ryan, I will send you the details directly if you want, but here's what a Cisco <span></span>PDI help desk person had to say on the topic:
<div><br>
</div>
<div><font><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)">Regarding your query, what the information you provided means is that this models has not been tested on version 10.5 of CUCM so no compatibility is guarantee, this does not means that the phones
won’t work but if any issue comes up with interoperability TAC will not support it.</span></font><br>
<br>
On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) <<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I'm not sure what's behind them not being on the compatibility matrix, but we've never officially removed support for any device that I can think of. If they aren't on there they just weren't tested.<br>
<br>
-Ryan<br>
<br>
On Jul 9, 2014, at 8:22 AM, GR <<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'grccie@gmail.com')">grccie@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
Thanks Anthony good point. Anyone from Cisco on the list can clarify this plz?<br>
<br>
VG224 and 7937 will definitely be a big deal.<br>
<br>
-gr<br>
<br>
> On 9 Jul 2014, at 4:02 pm, "Hughes, Scott GRE-MG" <<a href="mailto:SHughes@GREnergy.com">SHughes@GREnergy.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> I would love for some clarification on this-- specifically VG224, 7925, and 7937 support.<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Jul 8, 2014, at 3:26 PM, "Anthony Holloway" <<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'avholloway+cisco-voip@gmail.com')">avholloway+cisco-voip@gmail.com</a><mailto:<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'avholloway+cisco-voip@gmail.com')">avholloway+cisco-voip@gmail.com</a>>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
> It appears as though CUCM 10.5 drops official support for some phone and gateway models. E.g., 7925, 7937, 1861 and VG224. Or at least, the compatibility matrix is no longer being maintained for these products.<br>
><br>
> Check here:<br>
> <a href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified/communications/system/versions/IPTMtrix.html#wp1016708" target="_blank">
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified/communications/system/versions/IPTMtrix.html#wp1016708</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:23 AM, GR <<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'grccie@gmail.com')">grccie@gmail.com</a><mailto:<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'grccie@gmail.com')">grccie@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
> Hi Guys,<br>
><br>
> Was just about to do a fresh installation of ucm/cuc/im&p on a Cisco BE6k. Is 10.5 mature enough to go ahead?<br>
><br>
> Anyone has anything to share on whether to go for a 10.0 or 10.5?<br>
><br>
> Googling didnot yield sufficient results - if anyone can share there first hand experience or thoughts would be great.<br>
><br>
> -gr<br>
><br>
> Sent from my iPhone<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>
> <a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net')">
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><mailto:<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net')">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>
> <a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net')">
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><mailto:<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net')">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: The information contained in this message from<br>
> Great River Energy and any attachments are confidential and intended<br>
> only for the named recipient(s). If you have received this message in<br>
> error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the<br>
> information. Please contact the sender immediately by return email and<br>
> delete the original message.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net')">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>